Asia-Pacific nations are under pres-sure at an annual summit starting yesterday to consider a US-led drive for a huge free trade area stretching from China to Chile, but analysts question whether it would be feasible.
The Free Trade Area of the Asia Pacific, or FTAAP, would seek to harmonize a "noodle bowl" of bilateral and sub-regional agreements and offer an alternative to floundering global trade talks.
Advocates argue that it offers the best alternative liberalization vehicle in case the current Doha round of WTO talks collapses.
The Doha round on reducing global trade barriers has been deadlocked since July, mostly because of rows between the US, the EU and developing countries over agricultural subsidies.
"The FTAAP is an idea whose time is coming, if it has not already arrived," said Fred Bergsten, director of the Institute for International Economics in Washington.
A "fallback Plan B may become essential to keep the global trading system from relapsing into protectionism as the momentum of liberalization stalls," he wrote in a research paper.
The paper is part of a joint study by two respected business groups -- the APEC Business Advisory Council and the Pacific Economic Cooperation Council (PECC) -- on the feasibility of an APEC-wide free trade deal.
A report on the results of the study was obtained by reporters.
The US, the most influential member of APEC, is leading the push to study the feasibility of such a zone involving all 21 members.
US President George W. Bush may raise the issue during this weekend's leaders' summit in Hanoi, a Southeast Asian trade official said. But senior officials preparing for the summit said there has been opposition to the idea from countries like China.
While the FTAAP has certain attractive elements, the joint research paper concluded it was simply not politically feasible in the near term.
"The main reason for this assessment is that the political challenges of negotiating an FTAAP are so massive when placed against any likely political will," said Charles Morrison, PECC chairman and president of the Hawaii-based think tank East West Center.
Negotiating a free trade pact would need an overhaul of APEC processes, the business-backed study said. Commitments under the current APEC structure are voluntary, while a free trade agreement would be legally binding.
"Even before negotiations could begin, they would require major and controversial changes in APEC's '`ocial contract' which our studies indicate is likely to be resisted by a number of important member-economies," Morrison wrote.
Vinod Aggarwal, director of the APEC Study Center at the University of California, Berkeley, said protectionist interests arising from Washington's policy of selective liberalization could scuttle a cross-Pacific trade zone, with US industry likely to prefer the bilateral route.
Moreover, the growing US trade deficit with China is likely to render any regional free trade deal involving Beijing "dead on arrival in Congress for the foreseeable future," he said.
Bergsten, however, argued that while the leaders may not fully endorse the project this time, they should at least order an official study or exploratory discussion of the concept.
With APEC accounting for 60 percent of global economic output and half of world trade, the trade zone would be the single largest liberalization in history, Bergsten said.
He said agreeing to study the feasibility of an FTAAP could also act as a "credible political jolt" to non-APEC states, the EU, India and Brazil, forcing them to make new offers that would jumpstart the Doha round.
Bergsten said the proliferation of free trade pacts in East Asia -- which could evolve into a wider East Asia free trade zone -- threatened to "draw a line down the middle of the Pacific" amid similar trade groupings involving the US and Latin America.
This would "raise severe political and even security as well as economic problems for many countries in the region," he said.
The Ministry of Transportation and Communications yesterday inaugurated the Danjiang Bridge across the Tamsui River in New Taipei City, saying that the structure would be an architectural icon and traffic artery for Taiwan. Feted as a major engineering achievement, the Danjiang Bridge is 920m long, 211m tall at the top of its pylon, and is the longest single-pylon asymmetric cable-stayed bridge in the world, the government’s Web site for the structure said. It was designed by late Iraqi-British architect Zaha Hadid. The structure, with a maximum deck of 70m, accommodates road and light rail traffic, and affords a 200m navigation channel for boats,
PRECISION STRIKES: The most significant reason to deploy HIMARS to outlying islands is to establish a ‘dead zone’ that the PLA would not dare enter, a source said A High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) would be deployed to Penghu County and Dongyin Island (東引) in Lienchiang County (Matsu) to force the Chinese military to retreat at least 100km from the coastline, a military source said yesterday. Taiwan has been procuring HIMARS and Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) from the US in batches. Once all batches have been delivered, Taiwan would possess 111 HIMARS units and 504 ATACMS, which have a range of 300km. Considering that “offense is the best defense,” the military plans to forward-deploy the systems to outlying islands such as Penghu and Dongyin so that
WHAT WAS ALL THAT FOR? Jaw Shaw-kong said that Cheng Li-wen had pushed for more drastic cuts and attacked him, just for the outcome to be nearly identical to his bill The legislature yesterday passed a supplementary budget bill to fund the purchase of separate packages of US military equipment, with the combined amount of spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.8 billion). The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) used their legislative majority to pass the bill, which runs until 2033 and has two main funding provisions. One was for NT$300 billion of arms sales already approved by the US for Taiwan on Dec. 17 last year, the other was for NT$480 billion for another arms package expected to be announced by Washington. The bill, which fell short of the NT$1.25
‘CLEAR MESSAGE’: The bill would set up an interagency ‘tiger team’ to review sanctions tools and other economic options to help deter any Chinese aggression toward Taiwan US Representative Young Kim has introduced a bill to deter Chinese aggression against Taiwan, calling for an interagency “tiger team” to preplan coordinated sanctions and economic measures in response to possible Chinese military or political action against Taiwan. “[Chinese President] Xi Jinping [習近平] has directed the People’s Liberation Army to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. China has a plan. America should have one too,” Kim said in a news release on Thursday last week. She introduced the “Deter PRC [People’s Republic of China] aggression against Taiwan act” to “ensure the US has a coordinated sanctions strategy ready should