|
Kenyans feeding off Britons' love for roses
THE GUARDIAN, NAIROBI
Tuesday, Feb 14, 2006, Page 12
Valentine's Day: Rising British demand for flowers leads to a trade-off between the Kenyan economy and the environment.
Clasping a bouquet of roses, Paul Nyaga smiled shyly.
"Yes," he said, "there is someone I want to give flowers to on Valentine's Day, but the flowers won't be from here -- I'll get them from the field."
All around him, hundreds of workers in green overcoats were sorting blooms, assembling bouquets and wrapping them into plastic packaging complete with British supermarket logos and price tags, in the giant packing hall of Oserian flower farm in central Kenya.
Nyaga, 26, a slim young man in a brown shirt and blue baseball cap, was checking the labels on a boxful of roses destined for a Sainsbury's supermarket shelf. "Same Price. Same Quality. Now Fairtrade," the label promised.
"I don't know what Fairtrade means," Nyaga confessed. "I know that it's one of our products ... but I can't recall the meaning."
Britons spend over ?1.5 billion (US$2.6 billion) a year on cut flowers, and Kenya has nearly a quarter of the market, which peaks today as millions of Britons give flowers to loved ones on Valentine's Day. As many as 50,000 people now work in Kenya's flower industry, and for the past few weeks they have been working flat out to meet orders.
The industry, now the country's second-largest exporter, is driving the expansion of Kenya's economy and is fuelling a population boom around the shores of Lake Naivasha.
But the British love of roses and saying it with blooms has led to a tense trade-off between economic progress, environmental destruction and social problems.
At the Oserian farm, where 5,000 workers labor in a sprawl of greenhouses from where daily shipments head straight to Tesco's, Sainsbury, Marks & Spencer and other British outlets, the Fairtrade brand is seen as a way to polish the industry's tarnished image and balance the competing interests of business and Lake Naivasha's ecosystem.
For years, human rights groups lambasted Kenya's mainly foreign-owned flower companies over low pay, chemical hazards and the plight of casual workers.
Conditions have mostly improved since then and the ethical imperative has also prompted the company to seek ways to reduce its environmental impact, employing hydroponic farming to cut back on water use and getting three-quarters of its energy from a geothermal spring.
"Since Fairtrade has come in, the company is more careful with employees," said Isaac Mwagi, chairman of the self-help group which manages the workers' Fairtrade money in Oserian. "Before, there was just two months maternity leave, but now it is 100 days."
Not all is rosy in Oserian's garden, however. Last week workers rioted after being sacked en masse for striking in a dispute over wages and working conditions. Police reportedly fired teargas and fought running battles with strikers.
Fairtrade roses went on sale only two years ago, and most workers do not recognize the name. But it has a direct impact on their lives: 8 percent of the export price comes back to Oserian to be invested in community projects. That translates as about ?2,000 a month from British sales, while a similar brand in Switzerland, named Max Havelaar, netted the workers a premium of ?124,000 last year.
"Some people don't understand the concept," Mwagi admitted. "They want cash, and you have to explain that they need to identify a project -- because the concept says the project should benefit the majority and not an individual."
Though jobs in the flower farms are keenly sought after, environmentalists fear the impact of extracting water from the lake as well as the risks of pollution from pesticides.
"It's going to be a challenge to maintain the environment of the lake," said Sean Finlayson, roses manager at Oserian.
This story has been viewed 2147 times.
|