China Aviation Oil's (中國航油) spectacular trading losses in Singapore highlight the risks of becoming involved with Chinese firms as they increasingly seek listings on international exchanges, analysts warn.
Chinese companies venturing overseas go to great lengths to appear as if they have the same strict corporate governance standards as those in developed economies, but analysts say the changes are often merely cosmetic.
"They have been dressed up but you can't really take them out," the managing director of the Political and Economic Risk Consultancy in Hong Kong, Bob Broadfoot, said.
Broadfoot said the financial scandal surrounding Singapore-listed China Aviation Oil and its high-flying chief executive, Chen Juilin (陳久霖), reflected a culture of low accountability and transparency in many Chinese firms.
China Aviation Oil hit the headlines last week when it appealed to Singapore's High Court for protection from creditors after losing US$550 million in speculative oil derivatives trading that began last year.
The news shocked investors and financial authorities as the company had been regarded as one of the most reputable and successful of the more than 60 Chinese firms listed on the Singapore Exchange.
With a monopoly on importing jet fuel into China's booming aviation industry and having the backing of the Chinese government through a state-run firm owning a majority stake, China Aviation Oil was a darling of investors.
Indeed, the Securities Investors Association of Singapore, which acts as a watchdog for small investors, last year gave China Aviation Oil its "Most Transparent Company" award.
Chen, 43, also won glowing praise, with the local press in Singapore running lavish profiles and global institutions such as the influential Swiss-based World Economic Forum last year naming him as one of 40 "New Asian Leaders."
But now Chen, who flew to China immediately after news of the scandal broke, is wanted by Singapore authorities as they conduct a criminal investigation into the affair and allegations of insider trading are raised.
China Aviation Oil is particularly coming under scrutiny for failing to disclose its perilous financial situation to shareholders when the company's parent firm reduced its stake from 75 percent to 60 percent on Oct. 20.
"This is one more example, and there have been many, where the corporate governance standards of red chips are not what they should be," Broadfoot said, using the term given to Chinese firms listed overseas.
"When it comes to red chips, they are not the most reputable organizations in the world right now," he said.
International credit ratings agency Standard and Poor's expressed similar sentiments in the wake of the China Aviation Oil fiasco.
"The current financial difficulties of China Aviation Oil ... highlight the risks surrounding many China-based and China-related corporates as a result of limited transparency," Standard and Poor's said in a statement on Friday.
Standard and Poor's said it had been misled when it assessed China Aviation Oil as having a "moderate financial profile" in a survey on "China's top 100 corporates" released in October.
"Had information about the losses been available in October, when they occurred, Standard and Poor's opinion on the credit profile of CAOS (China Aviation Oil) would have been even lower," it said.
"CAOS' situation lends credence to Standard and Poor's previously expressed view that complex corporate structures and unreliable accounting practices make it difficult to perform substantive analysis on some China-related companies in the survey.
"On the accounting side, the problem of limited disclosure is compounded with problems of compliance."
Broadfoot said the risk for foreign investors and stock exchanges to become caught in Chinese financial webs was increasing as more and more firms from China looked to raise capital by listing overseas.
As in Hong Kong and elsewhere around the globe, the Singapore Exchange has actively sought Chinese firms to list with it and its safeguards have come under question over the China Aviation Oil fiasco.
‘NO SECURITY RISK’: The Railway Bureau reassured the public that the technicians’ activities were limited to technical guidance and did not involve sensitive systems The Railway Bureau yesterday said it had invited eight Chinese technicians to assist with an airport MRT construction project. The bureau issued the confirmation after an Internet user said Chinese nationals had entered the construction zone of Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport’s Terminal 3 project. They asked why “individuals from an enemy state” were allowed access to such a major national infrastructure project, which raised serious concerns over Taiwan’s industrial safety, sensitive systems and information security. The bureau’s Northern Region Engineering Branch Office said subcontractor Taiwan Handle Industrial Co (台灣手把工業) of the Taoyuan airport MRT’s “Contract No. CU05 Project A14 Station Civil, MEP &
A US uncrewed surface vessel (USV) encountered multiple Chinese warships during an autonomous transit of the Taiwan Strait, US defense company Seasats said in a statement on Wednesday. Seasats announced that a Lightfish USV had completed the first autonomous transit of the Taiwan Strait. Over five days, the USV traversed the entire length of the Strait while constantly monitoring surface vessel traffic, the company said. The Lightfish encountered multiple Chinese warships, one of which was a Chinese People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) Type 056 corvette, it said. The Chinese vessels were operating “well within Taiwan’s exclusive economic zone without transmitting their identity via the
‘BOOMING’: ’ The number of partners we have here is incredible. You can see from their stock prices. They’re doing so well, they’re so happy,’ Jensen Huang said Nvidia Corp’s spending in Taiwan has ballooned to about US$150 billion a year, 10 times the US$10 billion to US$15 billion the company spent five years ago, Nvidia chief executive officer Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) said yesterday, suggesting Taiwan’s strategic importance in the global artificial intelligence (AI) supply chain. “Taiwan is the epicenter of the AI revolution. This is where the chips come, packaging comes. This is where the systems are made. This is where AI supercomputers were created,” Huang said at a meeting for the company’s employees in Beitou-Shilin Technology Park (北投士林科技園區) in Taipei, the planned site of Nvidia’s Taipei headquarters. “Taiwan
GREATER REACH? Auto parts and wood products would face tariffs of up to 15%, matching those targeting the EU, Japan and South Korea, Vice Premier said The US has announced that preferential tariff treatment for Taiwan’s non-semiconductor Section 232 goods would take effect retroactively from May 1, the Executive Yuan said yesterday. The US government yesterday posted a notice on the Federal Register’s public inspection Web site previewing tariff concessions for Taiwan under a memorandum of understanding (MOU) on Taiwan-US investment after two months of negotiations. The MOU signed on Jan. 15 stipulated three major preferential tariff arrangements: a 15 percent “reciprocal” tariff rate for Taiwan without stacking most-favored nation (MFN) rates; preferential Section 232 treatment for semiconductors and related products; and preferential Section 232 treatment for non-semiconductor
RSS