Expect more of the same policies from the Bank of Japan (BOJ) for the indefinite future. The BOJ will continue to keep the short-term interest rate at or near zero and afford modest growth in the monetary base.
The interesting thing is that on Friday the BOJ gave a somewhat sanguine outlook about the country's growth prospects when it forecast that the economy will grow by 2.5 percent through the fiscal year 2003, which ends in March next year.
Still, BOJ Governor Toshihiko Fukui said that he views the economy through "cautious eyes." The problem, as he must see it, isn't growth; it's deflation, which is defined as a sustained fall in the consumer price or producer price level. Many economists view deflation as seriously as the collapse of the nation's banking sector.
The BOJ report forecasts consumer price deflation will endure past the March end of the fiscal year. The median forecast of BOJ's nine-member board calls for a drop of 0.3 percent in prices for the current fiscal year.
Fukui takes this very seriously. On Friday he said, "The Bank of Japan aims at putting Japan's economy back on a sustainable growth path by firmly maintaining the quantitative easing policy based on clear and concrete commitment with reference to the CPI." Now how could it be the case that an annualized decline of 0.3 percent in prices could achieve such importance in monetary policy? There's something unsettling about the price of goods falling on a consistent basis. People sense something must be wrong with the economy. This may be a legacy from the Great Depression, when falling prices became a symbol of the economic crisis.
Stock prices go up and down. When the price of rice or potatoes drops year after year, consumers have to wonder what's wrong with the economic system.
The cure offered by the authorities is often worse than the disease. While the phenomenon originates from monetary policy -- insufficient growth in the money supply -- governments often react by trying to control the price of goods and the level of production.
That's what was so tragically wrong about the policies of president Franklin D. Roosevelt's administration in the 1930s.
The New Deal policies tried to cure the depression by keeping prices from falling to protect producer profits. This in turn protected jobs.
Only a scoundrel would cut his price, so it was thought, and so it was enacted into law.
This idea is a fast trip to the belief that competition among suppliers is a harmful exercise. Follow this and you'll end up with no measurable deflation and no growth, either.
Japan today may have been a victim of the same knee-jerk reaction to deflation that prolonged the US depression in the 1930s. When prices fall, governments become protectionist.
The Japanese government's reaction to the last 13 years of economic malaise and accompanying deflation has been to block the competitive reconstruction of the economy.
You see this everywhere you look, in the forestalling of corporate bankruptcies and in banks continuing to lend to non-performing loan clients. The country has been on a mission to save companies from having to face competitive forces.
If prices need to fall, they need to fall. And if businesses are pressed by falling prices, then they need to be pressed.
Extending credit and other lifelines to companies that are technically insolvent does no one a favor.
For its part, the BOJ is right to continue to expand the money supply. That part is axiomatic, though it is far from certain that the BOJ has done enough money creation to curb falling prices.
The rest is experience. And this much is clear: A little bit of deflation can be the father of a great deal of very harmful policy response.
The Ministry of Transportation and Communications yesterday inaugurated the Danjiang Bridge across the Tamsui River in New Taipei City, saying that the structure would be an architectural icon and traffic artery for Taiwan. Feted as a major engineering achievement, the Danjiang Bridge is 920m long, 211m tall at the top of its pylon, and is the longest single-pylon asymmetric cable-stayed bridge in the world, the government’s Web site for the structure said. It was designed by late Iraqi-British architect Zaha Hadid. The structure, with a maximum deck of 70m, accommodates road and light rail traffic, and affords a 200m navigation channel for boats,
PRECISION STRIKES: The most significant reason to deploy HIMARS to outlying islands is to establish a ‘dead zone’ that the PLA would not dare enter, a source said A High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) would be deployed to Penghu County and Dongyin Island (東引) in Lienchiang County (Matsu) to force the Chinese military to retreat at least 100km from the coastline, a military source said yesterday. Taiwan has been procuring HIMARS and Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) from the US in batches. Once all batches have been delivered, Taiwan would possess 111 HIMARS units and 504 ATACMS, which have a range of 300km. Considering that “offense is the best defense,” the military plans to forward-deploy the systems to outlying islands such as Penghu and Dongyin so that
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), the world’s largest foundry service provider, yesterday said that global semiconductor revenue is projected to hit US$1.5 trillion in 2030, after the figure exceeds US$1 trillion this year, as artificial intelligence (AI) demand boosts consumption of token and compute power. “We are still at the beginning of the AI revolution, but we already see a significant impact across the whole semiconductor ecosystem,” TSMC deputy cochief operating officer Kevin Zhang (張曉強) said at the company’s annual technology symposium in Hsinchu City. “It is fair to say that in the past decade, smartphones and other mobile devices were
‘CLEAR MESSAGE’: The bill would set up an interagency ‘tiger team’ to review sanctions tools and other economic options to help deter any Chinese aggression toward Taiwan US Representative Young Kim has introduced a bill to deter Chinese aggression against Taiwan, calling for an interagency “tiger team” to preplan coordinated sanctions and economic measures in response to possible Chinese military or political action against Taiwan. “[Chinese President] Xi Jinping [習近平] has directed the People’s Liberation Army to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. China has a plan. America should have one too,” Kim said in a news release on Thursday last week. She introduced the “Deter PRC [People’s Republic of China] aggression against Taiwan act” to “ensure the US has a coordinated sanctions strategy ready should
RSS