Sun, Oct 13, 2019 - Page 5 News List

Californians ask whether blackouts the new normal

AFP, LOS ANGELES

The sun rises over power lines shrouded in smog created by the Saddleridge Fire in Newhall, California, on Friday.

Photo: AFP

Millions of people lost electricity this week in California as the state’s utility giant Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) sought to prevent catastrophic wildfires, leading many to question whether such power shutoffs will become the new normal.

The unprecedented outages plunged large swaths of Northern California in the dark, forcing the closure of schools and businesses, and prompting backlash and questions on how this could happen in a state that boasts the world’s fifth largest economy.

“This can’t be, respectfully, the new normal,” California Governor Gavin Newsom said on Thursday as he spoke with reporters. “And it is a false choice to say it’s hardship or safety.”

PG&E, the state’s largest private utility company that services about 5.4 million customers in the northern and central part of the state, has defended the shutoffs that affected about 2 million people as necessary to prevent wildfires that could be sparked by lines downed in heavy winds.

In November last year, PG&E’s faulty power lines were determined to have sparked the deadliest wildfire in the state’s modern history, which killed 86 and destroyed the town of Paradise.

Power lines were also behind devastating fires in 2017 in the Napa wine region.

PG&E, which filed for bankruptcy in January, has argued that the outages this week were necessary for safety reasons and said it would take days before power is restored to all customers, as employees must beforehand check the grid in person or electronically.

The beleaguered company also said that such shutoffs could be ordered annually until its aging power grid and power lines can be updated to handle fire hazards.

Experts believe such an overhaul can take a decade to complete, especially as PG&E is undergoing a massive reorganization linked to the multibillion-dollar settlements it has had to pay victims of last year’s fire.

Chief executive officer Bill Johnson apologized at a news conference on Thursday evening for the massive power cuts and admitted that the agency had poorly handled the issue.

“We were not adequately prepared,” he said, while defending the decision. “We faced a choice here between hardship on everyone and safety, and we chose safety.”

However, his argument was dismissed by many, including the governor, who blasted PG&E for failing to invest enough in the past few years to upgrade its power lines.

“It’s decisions that were not made that have led to this moment in PG&E’s history in the state of California,” Newsom told a news conference.

“This is not, from my perspective, a climate change story as much as a story about greed and mismanagement over the course of decades,” he said. “Neglect, a desire to advance not public safety, but profits.”

Mikhael Chester, a professor of sustainable energy at Arizona State University, said even if billions of dollars were spent to upgrade utility grids, power shutdowns would continue to happen, as infrastructure could not be expected to be “one hundred percent reliable.”

“We have pushed infrastructure to a point where we are going to have to recognize that reliability is going to become compromised more and more often,” he told Popular Science magazine.

As to suggestions that California bury its power lines underground to ward off wildfire, experts have said such a solution comes down to cost and time.

This story has been viewed 1875 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top