When Chinese police found them in the trunk of a smuggler’s car, 33 of the trafficked pangolins — endangered scaly mammals from southern China — were still alive, wrapped in plastic bags soaked with their own urine.
However, the fate of the creatures whose scales are worth nearly their weight in silver on the black market was not a happy one.
Every pangolin died in government captivity within a few months of the August 2017 seizure.
An environmental nonprofit in Beijing has launched an investigation, called “counting pangolins,” to figure out what happens to such animals recovered from the illegal wildlife trade. Its findings so far highlight discrepancies between environmental laws and outcomes.
China is hardly unique. The number of environmental laws on the books worldwide has increased 38-fold since 1972, according to a UN Environment Programme report released on Thursday.
However, the political will and capacity to enforce those laws often lags, undermining global efforts to curb issues such as wildlife trafficking, air pollution and climate change, the report found.
“The law doesn’t self-execute,” said Carl Bruch, study coauthor and director of international programs at the Environmental Law Institute in Washington.
Each of the 33 pangolins transferred to the care of a government-run wildlife rescue center in China’s Guangxi Province died within three months, according to records obtained by the nonprofit China Biodiversity Conservation and Green Development Foundation.
What is still unclear is what happened to their bodies.
Pangolins are insect-eating, scaly mammals — playfully described by the International Union for Conservation of Nature as “resembling an artichoke with legs and a tail.”
Their scales — made of keratin, the same material in human fingernails — are in high demand for Chinese traditional medicine to purportedly cure arthritis, promote breast-feeding and boost male virility, although there is no scientific backing for these beliefs.
The price of pangolin scales in China has risen from US$11 per kilogram in the 1990s to US$470 in 2014, according to researchers at Beijing Forestry University.
Scientists have designated all eight species of pangolin as being at risk of extinction — four species in Asia and four in Africa.
More than 1 million pangolins were trafficked between 2004 and 2014 — for their scales, meat and blood — with China and Vietnam as the largest markets. In the past two decades, the number of pangolins worldwide has dropped by about 90 percent.
In 2016, the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora adopted a worldwide ban on commercial trade in pangolins, and China later approved that ban. Pangolins are also listed as a protected species in China.
While state-run media have publicized a few high-profile poacher busts, watchdogs say that a thriving black market for endangered-animal parts persists.
In November 2017, customs officials in Shenzhen seized 11.9 tonnes of pangolin scales — reportedly the largest-ever seizure of scales from Africa — state media reported.
The penalties offenders face are not always publicized, but in another case involving a smaller shipment of scales, two smugglers received prison sentences of five years, state media said.
“It’s significant that China has adopted laws against trade in many endangered species, but the law itself isn’t enough to protect a species from extinction,” said Zhou Jinfeng (周晉峰), secretary-general of the China Biodiversity Conservation and Green Development Foundation.
Zhou wants the government to issue public records tracking all living and dead pangolins seized by authorities, and to offer evidence that contraband, including pangolin scales, is destroyed before it enters black markets.
“We are determined to know what happens to the pangolins,” foundation assistant secretary-general Sophia Zhang (張思遠) said.
After reading news reports about the August 2017 poaching bust, she filed information requests to government agencies and traveled to Guangxi to visit the wildlife rescue center.
The Guangxi Forestry Department, which manages the wildlife rescue center, declined requests for an interview and comment.
Xinhua news agency in December last year reported that China remains committed to stopping pangolin trafficking, adding that there were 209 pangolin smuggling busts from 2007 to 2016.
Less official attention has been paid to what happens after these busts.
In Guangxi, Zhang saw that pangolins were kept in small cages and fed cat food at the wildlife center, whereas wild pangolins eat termites. She said she had tried to coordinate with nonprofit Save Vietnam’s Wildlife to bring shipments of termites to feed the pangolins, but the center declined the offer.
After the animals died, the center would not reveal what happened to their bodies, but in other instances, the same center has turned over live pangolins to industry groups, including a steel factory in Guangdong Province and a farm associated with a Chinese traditional medicine center in Jiangxi Province. The government released this information on its Web site.
In response to an information request from Zhang, the Guangxi Forestry Department sent copies of the licenses held by these organizations for handling pangolins. The reason for transferring pangolins remains unclear.
“We want the wildlife center to provide a full explanation,” Zhang said. “We know the trade in pangolins is very lucrative. The public should be able to know what happens.”
The biodiversity nonprofit has filed information requests about trafficked wildlife in nearly 30 Chinese provinces and has attempted to verify what happens to pangolin scales seized by customs officials.
Wildlife rescue centers need better training to properly handle live animals, Zhang said.
“China has a rather complete set of environmental laws,” said Barbara Finamore, senior strategic director for Asia at the Natural Resources Defense Council in Washington. “But environmental laws are not worth the paper they’re written on unless there’s also strong enforcement and oversight.”
Countries large and small, rich and poor have passed extensive green legislation since the Rio Earth Summit in 1992.
“The world has made incredible progress in adopting environmental laws and environmental impact assessments, in creating environmental ministries and agencies,” Bruch said.
Now comes the hard part.
“The legal framework is there in an enormous number of countries,” said Deborah Seligsohn, a political scientist focusing on environmental policy at Villanova University. “But once you have all these laws, you need trained and willing personnel to actually enforce them. You need boots on the ground.”
Green mandates often go unfunded, said Barney Long, director of species conservation at Global Wildlife Conservation, a nonprofit in Austin, Texas.
“Many countries have laws stating the minimum number of park rangers that should be patrolling per square mile in national parks and protected areas, but these aren’t implemented if sufficient money isn’t appropriated,” Long said.
Non-governmental groups try to help close the gap between environmental laws and enforcement action, but in many countries, this is dangerous work.
In 2017, at least 207 environmental defenders — including forest rangers, advocates, journalists and inspectors — were murdered for performing such work, according to Global Witness, a research and advocacy group based in Washington and London.
However, there are some bright spots, experts say.
China is gradually releasing more environmental data, especially on air pollution, even as the government clamps down on other forms of information, and more officials are being held accountable, said Jennifer Turner, director of the Woodrow Wilson Center’s China Environment Forum in Washington.
“Before, local officials were only evaluated on economic performance, but now it’s harder to hide from environmental sins,” she said.
TARNISHED LEGACY: Woodrow Wilson served as the university’s president before becoming the US’ 28th leader, but his racism was ‘significant and consequential’ Princeton University is removing former US president Woodrow Wilson’s name from its public policy school and one of its residential colleges after trustees concluded that the 28th president’s “racist thinking and policies” made him “an inappropriate namesake.” The Ivy League school’s trustees made the decision on Friday, according to a statement on Saturday. It comes at a time of widespread rethinking of the US’ racial legacy. The Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement, energized by a series of high-profile deaths of black Americans, has resulted in the removal of Confederate monuments, flags and symbols of racism across the US. Deleting Wilson’s name at Princeton
‘FULLY ENCLOSED’: Residents of Anxin County would be confined to their homes and would only be allowed out once a day to buy necessities such as food and medicine China yesterday imposed a strict lockdown on nearly half a million people near the capital to contain a fresh COVID-19 cluster as authorities warned the outbreak was still “severe and complicated.” After China largely brought the virus under control, hundreds have been infected in Beijing and cases have emerged in Hebei Province. Health officials said that Anxin County — about 150km from Beijing — would be “fully enclosed and controlled,” the same strict measures imposed at the height of the pandemic in the city of Wuhan earlier this year. Only one person from each family would be allowed to go out once a
Japan said it opposed changes to the G7 nations as it pushed back against a reform plan by US President Donald Trump that would have rival South Korea this year join in an expanded meeting. Tokyo has told the US it stands against South Korea’s participation on the grounds of differences in policy on China and North Korea, Kyodo News reported this weekend, citing more than one source related to Japanese and US diplomacy. Japan also wants to maintain its status as the only Asian country in the group, the news agency added. Japanese Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga yesterday told reporters that
The onset of summer has sparked a rise in incidents of “mask rage” in South Korea as more hot and bothered commuters either refuse to wear face coverings or leave parts of their faces exposed. In South Korea, Japan and other countries in East Asia, widespread mask wearing has been cited as one possible explanation for the region’s relative success in bringing the COVID-19 pandemic under control. South Korea, one of the first countries outside China to be affected by the virus, flattened the coronavirus curve in April, although it is now struggling with dozens of daily cases, mainly in and around