Mon, Jun 04, 2018 - Page 5 News List

Trump team argue against subpoena


US President Donald Trump’s lawyers composed a secret 20-page letter to special counsel Robert Mueller to assert that Trump cannot be forced to testify, while arguing that he could not have committed obstruction because he has absolute authority over all federal investigations.

The existence of the letter, which was first reported and posted by the New York Times on Saturday, was a bold assertion of presidential power and another front on which Trump’s lawyers have argued that the president cannot be subpoenaed in the special counsel’s ongoing investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 US presidential election.

The letter is dated Jan. 29 and addressed to Mueller from John Dowd, one of Trump’s lawyers at the time who has since resigned from his legal team.

In the letter, Trump’s lawyers argue that a charge of illegal obstruction is moot because the US Constitution empowers the president to, “if he wished, terminate the inquiry, or even exercise his power to pardon.”

Trump weighed in on Saturday on Twitter, asking: “Is the Special Counsel/Justice Department leaking my lawyers letters to the Fake News Media?”

“When will this very expensive Witch Hunt Hoax ever end? So bad for our Country,” he added.

Mueller has requested an interview with Trump to determine whether he had criminal intent to obstruct the investigation into his associates’ possible links to Russia’s election interference.

Trump had previously signaled that he would be willing to sit for an interview, but his legal team, including head lawyer Rudy Giuliani, have privately and publicly expressed concern that the US president could risk charges of perjury.

If Trump does not consent to an interview, Mueller would have to decide whether to forge forward with a historic grand jury subpoena.

His team in March raised the possibility of subpoenaing the US president, but it is not clear if it is still under active consideration.

Giuliani has said that Trump’s legal team believes the special counsel does not have the authority to do so.

A court battle is likely if Trump’s team argues that the US president cannot be forced to answer questions or be charged with obstruction of justice.

Former US president Bill Clinton was charged with obstruction in 1998 by the US House of Representatives as part of his impeachment trial, and one of the articles of impeachment prepared against then-US president Richard Nixon in 1974 was for obstruction.

Topics of Mueller’s obstruction investigation include the firings of Comey and former US national security adviser Michael Flynn, as well Trump’s reaction to US Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ recusal from the Russia investigation.

Trump’s team and allies have waged a public relations campaign against Mueller to discredit the investigation.

Giuliani has previously said that the special counsel probe might be an “entirely illegitimate investigation” and need to be curtailed because, in his estimation, it was based on inappropriately obtained information from an informant and former FBI director James Comey’s memos.

In reality, the FBI in July 2016 began a counterintelligence investigation to determine if Trump campaign associates were coordinating with Russia to tip the US election.

Giuliani has said a decision would not be made about a possible interview with the special counsel until after Trump’s summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un.

This story has been viewed 2743 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top