A court challenge over the difficult process for airline passengers to remove their names from the US government’s list of suspected terrorists banned from flying is taking an unexpected twist, now focusing on the mysterious ways US federal agents add passenger names to the no-fly list in the first place.
The latest filing in a five-year federal case challenges the government’s undisclosed method of predicting who might commit a terrorist act in the future. The case could provide a glimpse into the government’s secret practices based on details about an airline passenger’s friendships, travels, financial transactions and more.
Plaintiffs in the case, represented by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), want the government to provide all the reasons, including evidence, why they are on the no-fly list, a roster of tens of thousands of people banned from flying to, from, within or over the US. They want to challenge those reasons in a court hearing.
As a result of the lawsuit filed in Portland, Oregon, US President Barack Obama’s administration came up with a new policy earlier this year to tell some Americans whether and why they were on the list. These changes partially lifted a veil of secrecy enshrouding a policy that has been a centerpiece of the government’s counterterrorism efforts since the Sept. 11, 2001 terror attacks. However, the government’s vague justifications and lack of details about its predictive formula are reminders of just how much opacity exists in US counterterrorism policies.
For good reason, the government has said: Disclosing details and evidence about why the US thinks someone is likely to carry out a terrorist act would compromise ongoing investigations, jeopardize national security and defeat the purpose of the no-fly list.
Placement on the list “requires predictive assessments about conduct that may or may not occur in the future,” the government said in a May court filing.
Risk assessments predicting future behavior are becoming more common in criminal justice systems across the US, but the ACLU said those risk assessments used in the states and even some federal systems are based on scientific models, and most people undergoing the assessment have been at least charged with a violent crime. Some people on the no-fly list have neither been charged with a terror-related crime nor any crime. Some might not even be the subject of a current FBI investigation.
Risk-assessment experts supporting the plaintiffs said in court filings that even if the government has a formula, an assessment tool used to predict who would engage in terrorism is unlikely to be very accurate.
The US Department of Justice declined to comment beyond the government’s previous court filings.
The government has said that there are specific criteria for being placed on the no-fly list: A person must pose a threat of carrying out an act of international or domestic terrorism involving an aircraft, or a terrorist act “with respect to the homeland,” or a terror act against a US facility or personnel overseas, or poses a threat of carrying out a terror act and is also “operationally capable” of doing so.
EVOLVING SITUATION: Of the latest cases, 23 percent were found to be asymptomatic, but the coronavirus strain in Da Nang is more contagious, authorities said A COVID-19 outbreak that began in the Vietnamese city of Da Nang more than a week ago has spread to at least four city factories with a combined workforce of about 3,700, state media reported yesterday. Four cases were found at the plants in different industrial parks in the central city that collectively employ 77,000 people, the Lao Dong newspaper said. Vietnam, praised widely for its decisive measures to combat the novel coronavirus since it first appeared in late January, is battling new clusters of infection having gone for more than three months without detecting any domestic transmissions. Authorities yesterday reported one new
‘COVIDIOTS’: Politicians condemned the protest that came amid surging infections in the country, while a marcher said government-induced fear weakened the body Loudly chanting their opposition to masks and vaccines, thousands of people on Saturday gathered in Berlin to protest against COVID-19 restrictions before being dispersed by police. Police put turnout at about 20,000 — well below the 500,000 organizers had announced as they urged a “day of freedom” from months of virus curbs. Despite Germany’s comparatively low toll, authorities are concerned at a rise in infections over the past few weeks and politicians took to social media to criticize the rally as irresponsible. “We are the second wave,” shouted the crowd, a mixture of hard left and right and conspiracy theorists, as they converged
A cat that went missing on a family holiday on the shores of Loch Lomond, Scotland, has been identified 12 years later. Tortoiseshell-and-white Georgie spent October half term in 2008 with her owners at the Rowardennan campsite, but vanished as they were due to return home to Greater Manchester, England. After a search of the site the Davies family departed without Georgie, hoping the three-year-old microchipped feline would be located by someone. Over the intervening 12 years, she remained close to the Queen Elizabeth Forest Park site, being fed and cared for by campsite staff and holidaymakers. After the COVID-19 pandemic hit and lockdown
Three Micronesian sailors stranded on a remote Pacific island have been found alive and well after a rescue team spotted their giant SOS message written into the sand on a beach. Australian and US military aircraft found the three men on tiny Pikelot island, nearly 200km west of where they had set off. Rescuers said that the men were “in good condition” with no significant injuries. The men had been missing for three days after their 7m skiff ran out of fuel and strayed off course. Authorities in the US territory of Guam raised the alarm on Saturday after the men failed to complete