A court challenge over the difficult process for airline passengers to remove their names from the US government’s list of suspected terrorists banned from flying is taking an unexpected twist, now focusing on the mysterious ways US federal agents add passenger names to the no-fly list in the first place.
The latest filing in a five-year federal case challenges the government’s undisclosed method of predicting who might commit a terrorist act in the future. The case could provide a glimpse into the government’s secret practices based on details about an airline passenger’s friendships, travels, financial transactions and more.
Plaintiffs in the case, represented by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), want the government to provide all the reasons, including evidence, why they are on the no-fly list, a roster of tens of thousands of people banned from flying to, from, within or over the US. They want to challenge those reasons in a court hearing.
Photo: AP
As a result of the lawsuit filed in Portland, Oregon, US President Barack Obama’s administration came up with a new policy earlier this year to tell some Americans whether and why they were on the list. These changes partially lifted a veil of secrecy enshrouding a policy that has been a centerpiece of the government’s counterterrorism efforts since the Sept. 11, 2001 terror attacks. However, the government’s vague justifications and lack of details about its predictive formula are reminders of just how much opacity exists in US counterterrorism policies.
For good reason, the government has said: Disclosing details and evidence about why the US thinks someone is likely to carry out a terrorist act would compromise ongoing investigations, jeopardize national security and defeat the purpose of the no-fly list.
Placement on the list “requires predictive assessments about conduct that may or may not occur in the future,” the government said in a May court filing.
Risk assessments predicting future behavior are becoming more common in criminal justice systems across the US, but the ACLU said those risk assessments used in the states and even some federal systems are based on scientific models, and most people undergoing the assessment have been at least charged with a violent crime. Some people on the no-fly list have neither been charged with a terror-related crime nor any crime. Some might not even be the subject of a current FBI investigation.
Risk-assessment experts supporting the plaintiffs said in court filings that even if the government has a formula, an assessment tool used to predict who would engage in terrorism is unlikely to be very accurate.
The US Department of Justice declined to comment beyond the government’s previous court filings.
The government has said that there are specific criteria for being placed on the no-fly list: A person must pose a threat of carrying out an act of international or domestic terrorism involving an aircraft, or a terrorist act “with respect to the homeland,” or a terror act against a US facility or personnel overseas, or poses a threat of carrying out a terror act and is also “operationally capable” of doing so.
‘IN A DIFFERENT PLACE’: The envoy first visited Shanghai, where he attended a Chinese basketball playoff match, and is to meet top officials in Beijing tomorrow US Secretary of State Antony Blinken yesterday arrived in China on his second visit in a year as the US ramps up pressure on its rival over its support for Russia while also seeking to manage tensions with Beijing. The US diplomat tomorrow is to meet China’s top brass in Beijing, where he is also expected to plead for restraint as Taiwan inaugurates president-elect William Lai (賴清德), and to raise US concerns on Chinese trade practices. However, Blinken is also seeking to stabilize ties, with tensions between the world’s two largest economies easing since his previous visit in June last year. At the
UNSETTLING IMAGES: The scene took place in front of TV crews covering the Trump trial, with a CNN anchor calling it an ‘emotional and unbelievably disturbing moment’ A man who doused himself in an accelerant and set himself on fire outside the courthouse where former US president Donald Trump is on trial has died, police said yesterday. The New York City Police Department (NYPD) said the man was declared dead by staff at an area hospital. The man was in Collect Pond Park at about 1:30pm on Friday when he took out pamphlets espousing conspiracy theories, tossed them around, then doused himself in an accelerant and set himself on fire, officials and witnesses said. A large number of police officers were nearby when it happened. Some officers and bystanders rushed
Beijing is continuing to commit genocide and crimes against humanity against Uyghurs and other Muslim minorities in its western Xinjiang province, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said in a report published on Monday, ahead of his planned visit to China this week. The State Department’s annual human rights report, which documents abuses recorded all over the world during the previous calendar year, repeated language from previous years on the treatment of Muslims in Xinjiang, but the publication raises the issue ahead of delicate talks, including on the war in Ukraine and global trade, between the top U.S. diplomat and Chinese
RIVER TRAGEDY: Local fishers and residents helped rescue people after the vessel capsized, while motorbike taxis evacuated some of the injured At least 58 people going to a funeral died after their overloaded river boat capsized in the Central African Republic’s (CAR) capital, Bangui, the head of civil protection said on Saturday. “We were able to extract 58 lifeless bodies,” Thomas Djimasse told Radio Guira. “We don’t know the total number of people who are underwater. According to witnesses and videos on social media, the wooden boat was carrying more than 300 people — some standing and others perched on wooden structures — when it sank on the Mpoko River on Friday. The vessel was heading to the funeral of a village chief in