Wed, Nov 19, 2014 - Page 7 News List

Leaders gather in Vienna to mull Iran nuclear plan


Iran and six world powers descended on Vienna yesterday seeking to nail down a mammoth nuclear deal, six days before a deadline with differences still considerable despite months of negotiations.

Such an accord could not only consign to history one of the 21st century’s most intractable geopolitical conundrums by easing fears once and for all that Iran might build a nuclear bomb. It could also silence talk of war, put Iran and the West on the road to normalized relations after 35 years in the deep freeze and give US President Barack Obama a rare foreign policy success.

However, factions in both the US and Iran are putting their negotiators under pressure not to give too much away and it is far from certain that a deal can be done.

“There’s still a big gap. We may not be able to get there,” Obama said on Sunday.

Iran’s arch foe Israel, widely assumed to have a formidable nuclear arsenal itself, is also watching closely, as are Sunni Gulf monarchies uneasy about any US rapprochement with Shiite Iran.

The US, China, Russia, Britain, France and Germany (the P5+1) want Iran to scale down its nuclear program to make it virtually impossible for the nation to assemble an atomic bomb.

Iran, which says its nuclear aims are exclusively peaceful, wants painful sanctions lifted and a recognition of its “right” to a peaceful nuclear program.

On Nov. 24 last year, after Iranian President Hassan Rouhani came to power, Iran and the P5+1 secured an interim agreement.

However, they missed a July 20 deadline to reach a comprehensive accord, giving themselves four more months, which expires on Monday.

US Secretary of State John Kerry, due back in Vienna later this week, said at the time that the talks were “the best chance we’ve ever had to resolve this issue peacefully.”

And now, says lead US negotiator Wendy Sherman, it is “time to finish the job.”

Some areas in what would be a highly complex agreement appear provisionally sewn up, like altering a reactor being built at Arak, a different use for the Fordo facility — under a mountain to protect it from air attack — and more inspections.

The big problem remains enrichment, which renders uranium suitable for power generation and making nuclear medicines — but also, at high purities, for a weapon.

Iran wants to ramp up massively the number of enrichment centrifuges in order, it says, to make reactor fuel. The West wants them slashed, saying Iran has no such need at present.

Other thorny issues are the duration of the accord and the pace at which sanctions are lifted, an area where Iranian expectations are “excessive,” one Western diplomat said.

“They want everything, all at once and this is not realistic,” the diplomat involved in the talks said.

Given the differences, many analysts expect another extension.

“There is virtually no possibility that a complete deal will be concluded by Nov. 24,” former top US diplomat on non-proliferation Robert Einhorn, now an expert with the Brookings Institution, told reporters. “I think they’ll agree to extend the interim arrangements for several more months.”

And the alternative — walking away — would be “catastrophic,” Arms Control Association analyst Kelsey Davenport said.

This story has been viewed 1718 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top