Sun, Aug 24, 2014 - Page 5 News List

Stop-start talks fail to end Pakistan political impasse

‘LAWLESS OUTSIDE ELEMENTS’:Negotiations were dominated by the killings of 10 opposition workers by police, and came after the resignations of 34 PTI lawmakers

AFP, ISLAMABAD

Cricketer-turned-politician Imran Khan, head of opposition political party Pakistan Tehrik-e-Insaf, speaks to supporters during a mass anti-government protest for the eighth day in Islamabad, Pakistan, on Friday.

Photo: EPA

Pakistan’s government and opposition groups made little headway in overnight talks aimed at dispersing protesters seeking the fall of the prime minister, as their negotiations entered a fourth day yesterday.

Cricketer-turned-politician Imran Khan and populist cleric Tahir-ul-Qadri have led thousands of supporters demonstrating outside the legislature this week calling for Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif to go.

A government delegation met Qadri’s team early yesterday to discuss the demands of the cleric’s Pakistan Awami Tehreek (PAT) movement, but the PAT came away dissatisfied.

“We believe in [the] dialogue process, but it seems the government team did not come with a clear mandate,” Rahiq Abbasi, a member of Qadri’s team, told reporters after the talks.

“We don’t think they are serious in carrying forward the process,” he added.

Their talks were again dominated by the issue of the alleged murder of at least 10 PAT workers in clashes with police in Lahore in June, for which Qadri wants arrests made and a legal case launched.

Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf (PTI) held their own talks with the government late on Friday, which proved equally fruitless.

Those talks came hours after the PTI, the third-largest party in the Pakistani National Assembly, submitted the resignations of their 34 lawmakers in the assembly to the parliament’s speaker.

The letters are to be opened and verified tomorrow, speaker Ayaz Sadiq told private Geo television, ultimately triggering by-elections unless they are withdrawn.

PTI vice chairman Shah Mehmood Qureshi told reporters the next round of talks would be held later on Saturday.

Khan insists that May last year’s general election, which swept Sharif to power in a landslide, was rigged and therefore the prime minister should step down, though observers rated the vote free and credible.

Ahsan Iqbal, a government minister and member of its negotiating team, claimed meetings with the two groups had made progress, without elaborating, and added: “We have agreed the talks will continue.”

Sharif’s Pakistan Muslim League-N (PML-N) party insist he will not quit and accuse the protesters of undermining the country’s fragile democracy.

Qadri and Khan’s protest movements are not formally allied and have different goals, beyond toppling the government. However, their combined pressure — and numbers — have given extra heft to the rallies.

If one group were to reach a settlement with the government and withdraw, the other’s position would be significantly weakened.

The standoff has raised fears of possible military intervention in the country, which has seen three coups since its creation in 1947.

However, analysts say the army is more likely to use the crisis to assert influence behind the scenes than stage an outright power grab.

Neither movement has mobilized mass support beyond their core followers, and opposition parties have shunned Khan’s call to unseat the government and begin a campaign of civil disobedience.

Despite rumors that the military had some hand in the protests, Pakistani Minister for Water and Power Abid Sher Ali, a PML-N stalwart, insisted there was “no pressure on us from any state institution to resign.”

“It is the imagination of some lawless and outside elements camping out there,” he said.

However, if a full-blown coup d’etat looks unlikely — such a move could jeopardize billions of dollars in foreign assistance and trade deals — analysts say the crisis will leave Sharif weakened.

This story has been viewed 1699 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top