Fearing a genocide of Christians, the Vatican has given its approval to US military air strikes in Iraq — a rare exception to its policy of peaceful conflict resolution.
Permanent Observer of Holy See to the UN in Geneva Silvano Tomasi last weekend supported US air strikes aimed at halting the advance of Islamic State militants, previously known as the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, calling for “intervention now, before it is too late.”
“Military action might be necessary,” he said.
While the Vatican vocally disapproved of the US-led campaign in Iraq in 2003 and last year’s plan for air strikes on Syria — fearing both might make the situations worse for Christians on the ground — fears of ethnic cleansing by Islamists has forced a policy change.
Tomasi’s appeal followed warnings from church leaders in Iraq that the persecution is becoming a genocide, with urgent help needed to protect Christians and Yezidis in the north of the country, where tens of thousands have been forced to flee for their lives.
Military support was needed “to stop the wolf getting to the flock to kill, eat, destroy,” Rabban al-Qas, the Chaldean bishop of Amadiyah, told Vatican radio.
“Those supplying arms and funds to the fundamentalists, [and] the countries tacitly supporting them, must be revealed,” Tomasi said, while Qas pointed the finger at Saudi Arabia.
Others, such as the Iraq-based leader of the Chaldean Catholic Church, Louis Sako, called for wider intervention, saying the US strikes offer little hope the jihadists would be defeated.
“The position of the American President [Barack] Obama only to give military assistance to protect Erbil is disappointing,” said Sako, who has been trying to persuade his flock to resist attempts to drive them out of Iraq.
The Vatican had been accused of being slow to react, with Pope Francis limiting himself to calls for a peaceful resolution, expressing on Sunday his “dismay and disbelief” over the violence and calling for an “effective political solution.”
The Vatican’s Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue on Tuesday called for Muslim leaders to denounce the brutality of Islamic State militants, saying there was no possible justification for their “unspeakable crimes.”
The council said Islamic State militants were guilty of the “heinous practice of decapitation, crucifixion and stringing up bodies in public places,” insisting that “no reason, certainly not religion, could justify such barbarism.”
Religious watchers said Tomasi’s support for air strikes did not mean a change in Vatican policy on war spearheaded by Francis.
“There has been no change in thinking. The Vatican’s take is that the reality now is apocalyptic and there is no alternative,” said Vatican expert John Allen, who writes for the Boston Globe.
“They believed overthrowing [then-Iraqi president] Saddam Hussein in 2003 or [Syrian President] Bashar al-Assad in 2013 would make things worse for Christians. In 2014, what could be worse for them than the Islamic State’s victory?” he said.
The Catholic Church’s catechism defines the concept of a “just war,” which includes the prevention of genocide among other war crimes.
For Sandro Magister, who writes for La Stampa’s Vatican Insider, the crisis should have elicited a stronger stance from the pope: “His timid response has been very surprising. He talks about the persecution of Christians in Iraq as if it was some sort of natural disaster.”
The death of a former head of China’s one-child policy has been met not by tributes, but by castigation of the abandoned policy on social media this week. State media praised Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), former head of China’s National Family Planning Commission from 1988 to 1998, as “an outstanding leader” in her work related to women and children. The reaction on Chinese social media to Peng’s death in Beijing on Sunday, just shy of her 96th birthday, was less positive. “Those children who were lost, naked, are waiting for you over there” in the afterlife, one person posted on China’s Sina Weibo platform. China’s
‘NO COUNTRY BUMPKIN’: The judge rejected arguments that former prime minister Najib Razak was an unwitting victim, saying Najib took steps to protect his position Imprisoned former Malaysian prime minister Najib Razak was yesterday convicted, following a corruption trial tied to multibillion-dollar looting of the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) state investment fund. The nation’s high court found Najib, 72, guilty on four counts of abuse of power and 21 charges of money laundering related to more than US$700 million channeled into his personal bank accounts from the 1MDB fund. Najib denied any wrongdoing, and maintained the funds were a political donation from Saudi Arabia and that he had been misled by rogue financiers led by businessman Low Taek Jho. Low, thought to be the scandal’s mastermind, remains
Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese yesterday announced plans for a national bravery award to recognize civilians and first responders who confronted “the worst of evil” during an anti-Semitic terror attack that left 15 dead and has cast a heavy shadow over the nation’s holiday season. Albanese said he plans to establish a special honors system for those who placed themselves in harm’s way to help during the attack on a beachside Hanukkah celebration, like Ahmed al-Ahmed, a Syrian-Australian Muslim who disarmed one of the assailants before being wounded himself. Sajid Akram, who was killed by police during the Dec. 14 attack, and
VISHNU VANDALS: A Cambodian official accused Thailand of destroying a statue in a disputed border area, with video showing the Hindu structure being torn down The Thai military said ceasefire talks with Cambodia, set to begin yesterday, are expected to conclude with a meeting of the countries’ defense ministers on Saturday, as the two sides seek to end weeks of deadly clashes. The talks started at 4pm in Thailand’s Chanthaburi Province, which borders Cambodia. The Thai Ministry of Defense outlined several demands to be discussed ahead of the bilateral meeting of the General Border Committee (GBC) on Saturday. If secretariat-level discussions fail to reach agreement on key technical frameworks such as troop deployments, the Thai side would not proceed with the GBC meeting or sign any agreement on