Mon, Dec 09, 2013 - Page 7 News List

Obama defends interim deal with Iran

NO ‘IDEAL WORLD’:Obama said that the deal, which Israel calls ‘a historic mistake,’ makes an agreement possible, but the chances of a satisfactory end state are 50/50

Reuters, WASHINGTON

US President Barack Obama on Saturday defended an interim deal with Iran to curb its nuclear program and, seeking to reassure Israel, pledged to step up sanctions or prepare for a potential military strike if Tehran fails to abide by the pact.

US relations with Israel have been strained by the interim agreement, reached between Iran and major world powers including the US, which was designed to halt advances in Iran’s nuclear program and buy time for negotiations on a final settlement.

The US says the agreement will give the international community time to see if Tehran is serious about curbing its nuclear ambitions, while providing some relief from sanctions that have crippled its economy.

Israel believes any sanctions relief is a dangerous gift to a country that threatens its very existence, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has called the deal reached in Geneva a “historic mistake.”

Obama, speaking at forum hosted by Haim Saban, a major political donor, made a point of referring to Netanyahu as “my friend Bibi,” while acknowledging they occasionally had “significant tactical” disagreements.

Obama said the interim deal, negotiated with Iran by the US, China, Russia, Britain, France and Germany, would provide space for a longer-ranging agreement to curb Iran’s nuclear ambitions, which Tehran says are peaceful.

The president said he viewed the likelihood of a satisfactory “end state” as a 50/50 proposition, and repeated that all options remained on the table if Iran did not follow through with its obligations.

“If we cannot get the kind of comprehensive end state that satisfies us and the world community ... then the pressure that we’ve been applying on them and the options that I have made clear I can avail myself of, including a military option, is one that we would consider and prepare for,” he said.

Obama said it was unrealistic to believe that Iran would halt and dismantle its nuclear program if the sanctions regime were strengthened and talks were not given a chance to succeed.

“One can envision an ideal world in which Iran said: ‘We’ll destroy every element and facility and you name it, it’s all gone.’ I can envision a world which Congress passed every one of my bills that I put forward. I mean, there are a lot of things that I can envision that would be wonderful,” he said to laughter from the audience.

“But precisely because we don’t trust the nature of the Iranian regime, I think that we have to be more realistic and ask ourselves: What puts us in a strong position to assure ourselves that Iran’s not having a nuclear weapon ... what is required to accomplish that and how does that compare to other options that we might take?” he asked.

Israeli Minister of Strategic Affairs Yuval Steinitz, in reaction to Obama’s remarks, said the two countries needed to resolve their differences on the issue.

“It must be made clear: In the final agreement, Iran must not have the capability to produce nuclear weapons. In order to ensure this, Iran must not have any capability to enrich uranium or to produce plutonium,” Steinitz said.

Obama suggested any enrichment capacity left in Iran would be limited.

“It is my strong belief that we can envision an end state that gives us an assurance that even if they have some modest enrichment capability, it is so constrained and the inspections are so intrusive that they, as a practical matter, do not have breakout capacity,” he said.

This story has been viewed 880 times.
TOP top