US forces are obliged to help defend Philippine troops, ships or aircraft under a 1951 Mutual Defense Treaty if they come under attack in the disputed Spratly Islands (南沙群島) in the South China Sea, Philippine officials said, citing past US assurances.
The potentially oil and gas-rich Spratly Islands have long been regarded as one of Asia’s possible flash points for conflict.
China, the Philippines and Vietnam have been trading barbs and diplomatic protests recently over overlapping territorial claims to the islands, reigniting tensions.
Complicating the issue is the role the US could play in resolving the disputes. A Mutual Defense Treaty signed by US and Philippine officials on Aug. 30, 1951, calls on each country to help defend the other against an external attack by an aggressor in their territories or in the Pacific region.
Amid renewed tensions in the Spratlys, questions have emerged whether the treaty would apply if ill-equipped Philippine forces come under attack in the islands, all of which are claimed by China. Parts also are claimed by Taiwan, Brunei, Malaysia, the Philippines and Vietnam.
The Philippine Department of Foreign Affairs said in a policy paper that the treaty requires Washington to help defend Philippine forces if they come under attack in the Spratly Islands, citing US diplomatic dispatches that defined the Pacific region under the treaty as including the South China Sea. The South China Sea was not specifically mentioned in the pact.
A copy of the policy paper was seen on Wednesday.
Philippine Foreign Secretary Albert del Rosario also said in a recent interview that US officials have made clear that Washington would respond should Philippine forces come under attack in the South China Sea.
Del Rosario said by telephone from Washington that he would discuss the Spratly disputes, along with issues related to the 1951 defense treaty and other regional security concerns with US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton when they met yesterday.
The US embassy in Manila declined to discuss details of when the pact would apply.
“As a strategic ally, the United States honors our Mutual Defense Treaty with the Philippines,” said Alan Holst, acting public affairs officer at the embassy. “We will not engage in discussion of hypothetical scenarios.”
The defense treaty, which came into force in 1952, defined an attack as an armed assault on “the metropolitan territory of the parties” or their “armed forces, public vessels or aircraft in the Pacific.” While the US has a policy of not interfering in territorial disputes, the Philippine paper said: “It may be construed that any attack on our vessels, armed forces or aircraft in the Spratlys would make the treaty applicable and accordingly obligate the US to act to meet the common dangers.”
China has urged the US to stay out of territorial disputes in the South China Sea, saying they should be resolved through bilateral negotiations.
On Wednesday, Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Cui Tiankai (崔天凱) warned that Washington risks getting drawn into a conflict should tensions in the region escalate further.
Washington views the sea lanes in the area as strategically important.
“If the United States does want to play a role, it may counsel restraint to those countries that have frequently been taking provocative action and ask them to be more responsible in their behavior,” Cui said at a briefing.
He later added: “I believe that individual countries are actually playing with fire and I hope that fire will not be drawn to the United States.”
The Philippines has accused China of intruding at least six times in Philippine-claimed areas in and near the Spratly Islands since February. Among the most serious was a reported firing by a Chinese navy vessel on Feb. 25 to scare away Philippine fishermen from the Jackson Atoll.
Young Chinese, many who fear age discrimination in their workplace after turning 35, are increasingly starting “one-person companies” that have artificial intelligence (AI) do most of the work. Smaller start-ups are already in vogue in Silicon Valley and elsewhere, with rapidly advancing AI tools seen as a welcome teammate even as they threaten layoffs at existing firms. More young people in China are subscribing to the model, as cities pledge millions of dollars in funding and rent subsidies for such ventures, in alignment with Beijing’s political goal of “technological self-reliance.” “The one-person company is a product of the AI era,” said Karen Dai
South Korea’s air force yesterday apologized for a 2021 midair collision involving two fighter jets, a day after auditors said the pilots were taking selfies and filming during the flight and held them responsible for the accident. “We sincerely apologize to the public for the concern caused by the accident that occurred in 2021,” an air force spokesman told a news conference, adding that one of the pilots involved had been suspended from flying duties, received severe disciplinary action and has since left the military. The apology followed a report released on Wednesday by the South Korean Board of Audit and Inspection,
About 240 Indians claiming descent from a Biblical tribe landed at Tel Aviv airport on Thursday as part of a government operation to relocate them to Israel. The newcomers passed under a balloon arch in blue and white, the colors of the Israeli flag, as dozens of well-wishers welcomed them with a traditional Jewish song. They were the first “bnei Menashe” (“sons of Manasseh”) to arrive in Israel since the government in November last year announced funding for the immigration of about 6,000 members of the community from the states of Manipur and Mizoram in northeast India. The community claims to descend from
‘TROUBLING’: The firing of Phelan, who was an adviser to a nonprofit that supported the defense of Taiwan, was another example of ‘dysfunction’ under Trump, a US senator said US Secretary of the Navy John Phelan has been fired, a US official and a person familiar with the matter said on Wednesday, in another wartime shakeup at the Pentagon coming just weeks after US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth ousted the Army’s top general. The Pentagon announced his departure in a brief statement, saying he was leaving the administration “effective immediately,” but it did not provide a reason or say whether it was his decision to go. The sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said Phelan was dismissed in part because he was moving too slowly to implement reforms to