The US commander in Afghanistan on Monday apologized over a magazine profile that quotes him denouncing a top diplomat while his aides dismiss US President Barack Obama and mock his deputies.
Tensions between General Stanley McChrystal and the White House are on full display in the unflattering article in Rolling Stone magazine, but the general said it was all a mistake.
“I extend my sincerest apology for this profile,” McChrystal said in a statement issued hours after the article was released. “It was a mistake reflecting poor judgment and should never have happened.”
McChrystal, a former special operations chief, usually speaks cautiously in public and has enjoyed mostly sympathetic US media coverage since he took over the NATO-led force last year. However, the article appears to catch him and his staff in unguarded moments.
“Throughout my career, I have lived by the principles of personal honor and professional integrity. What is reflected in this article falls far short of that standard … I have enormous respect and admiration for President Obama and his national security team,” McChrystal said.
In the profile, McChrystal jokes sarcastically about preparing to answer a question referring to US Vice President Joe Biden, known as a skeptic of the commander’s war strategy.
“‘Are you asking about Vice President Biden?’ McChrystal says with a laugh. ‘Who’s that?’” the article quotes him as saying. “‘Biden?’ suggests a top adviser. ‘Did you say: Bite Me?’”
McChrystal tells the magazine that he felt “betrayed” by the US ambassador to Kabul, Karl Eikenberry, in a White House debate over war strategy last year.
Referring to a leaked internal memo from Eikenberry that questioned McChrystal’s request for more troops, the commander suggested the ambassador had tried to protect himself for history’s sake.
“I like Karl, I’ve known him for years, but they’d never said anything like that to us before,” McChrystal tells the magazine. “Here’s one that covers his flank for the history books. Now if we fail, they can say, ‘I told you so.’”
Eikenberry, himself a former commander in Afghanistan, had written to the White House saying Afghan President Hamid Karzai was an unreliable partner and that a surge of troops could draw the US into a open-ended quagmire.
The article revisits the friction between the White House and the military last fall as Obama debated whether to grant McChrystal’s request for tens of thousands of reinforcements.
Although Obama in the end granted most of what McChrystal asked for, the strategy review was a difficult time, the general tells the magazine.
“I found that time painful,” McChrystal says. “I was selling an unsellable position.”
An unnamed adviser to McChrystal alleges the general came away unimpressed after a meeting with Obama in the Oval Office a year ago.
“It was a 10-minute photo op,” the general’s adviser said. “Obama clearly didn’t know anything about him, who he was ... he didn’t seem very engaged.”
The profile, titled “The Runaway General,” argues that McChrystal has pushed through his vision of how to fight the war, sidelining White House and US Deparment of State heavyweights along the way.
His aides are portrayed as intensely loyal to McChrystal while dismissive of the White House and those who question their commander’s approach.
One aide calls the national security adviser, Jim Jones, a retired general, a “clown” who is “stuck in 1985.”
One unnamed senior military official speculates that yet another surge of US forces could be requested “if we see success here.”
However, his own troops voice doubts about the war and new rules limiting the use of force at a meeting with McChrystal at a combat outpost near Kandahar City, according to the magazine.
“Sir, some of the guys here, sir, think we’re losing, sir,” one sergeant tells him.
McChrystal complains about a dinner with an unnamed French minister during a visit to France in April.
In a hotel room in Paris getting ready for a dinner with the French official, McChrystal says: “How’d I get screwed into going to this dinner?”
He also derides the hard-charging top US envoy to the region, Richard Holbrooke.
“Oh, not another e-mail from Holbrooke,” McChrystal says, looking at his messages on a mobile phone. “I don’t even want to open it.”
Le Tuan Binh keeps his Moroccan soldier father’s tombstone at his village home north of Hanoi, a treasured reminder of a man whose community in Vietnam has been largely forgotten. Mzid Ben Ali, or “Mohammed” as Binh calls him, was one of tens of thousands of North Africans who served in the French army as it battled to maintain its colonial rule of Indochina. He fought for France against the Viet Minh independence movement in the 1950s, before leaving the military — as either a defector or a captive — and making a life for himself in Vietnam. “It’s very emotional for me,”
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi reaffirmed his pledge to replace India’s religion-based marriage and inheritance laws with a uniform civil code if he returns to office for a third term, a move that some minority groups have opposed. In an interview with the Times of India listing his agenda, Modi said his government would push for making the code a reality. “It is clear that separate laws for communities are detrimental to the health of society,” he said in the interview published yesterday. “We cannot be a nation where one community is progressing with the support of the Constitution while the other
The Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) Central Committee is to gather in July for a key meeting known as a plenum, the third since the body of elite decisionmakers was elected in 2022, focusing on reforms amid “challenges” at home and complexities broad. Plenums are important events on China’s political calendar that require the attendance of all of the Central Committee, comprising 205 members and 171 alternate members with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) at the helm. The Central Committee typically holds seven plenums between party congresses, which are held once every five years. The current central committee members were elected at the
CODIFYING DISCRIMINATION: Transgender people would be sentenced to three years in prison, while same-sex relations could land a person in jail for more than a decade Iraq’s parliament on Saturday passed a bill criminalizing same-sex relations, which would receive a sentence of up to 15 years in prison, in a move rights groups condemned as an “attack on human rights.” Transgender people would be sentenced to three years’ jail under the amendments to a 1988 anti-prostitution law, which were adopted during a session attended by 170 of 329 lawmakers. A previous draft had proposed capital punishment for same-sex relations, in what campaigners had called a “dangerous” escalation. The new amendments enable courts to sentence people engaging in same-sex relations to 10 to 15 years in prison, according to the