Fri, Apr 02, 2010 - Page 4 News List

FEATURE : Army proves to be silent political actor in Thailand


Thai soldiers wearing gas masks prepare for a mass demonstration during a drill inside the Government House compound in Bangkok on March 16.


While a populist street movement paints Bangkok red, the army has been quietly acting its own role and will be pivotal to determining how the crisis plays out, analysts say.

Experts differ on who will win the political battle pitting Oxford-educated Thai Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva against the “Red Shirts” loyal to his ousted billionaire predecessor, Thaksin Shinawatra.

But they agree that some of the real power play is taking place behind closed doors.

The army, responsible for no fewer than 18 coups or attempted coups since 1932, overthrew Thaksin in September 2006 and appointed a general to head an interim government, which created a new constitution during its year in power.

Thaksin’s allies took office in 2007 elections, but were hounded by a series of lawsuits and a vocal protest movement. They were toppled by court rulings in 2008 that saw Abhisit come to power through a parliamentary vote.

The coup still looms large over the political stage, said Thongchai Winichakul, a Thai analyst at the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the US.

“The 2006 coup has let the genie out of the bottle,” said Thongchai, arguing that the country’s establishment had asked the army to step in and restore order. “Of course they didn’t turn down the invitation to power.”

The Red Shirts have argued that former prime minister Prem Tinsulanonda, who is now the chief adviser to Thailand’s revered King Bhumibol Adulyadej, masterminded the putsch.

The monarch has been a stabilizing force during six politically turbulent decades on the throne, but he has kept out of the current crisis.

Observers now say Abhisit and his fragile coalition government survive only with the support of the army and its chief, General Anupong Paojinda.

The current army leadership “and [Abhisit’s] Democrats are both adamantly anti-Thaksin,” said Paul Chambers, a Thailand expert at Germany’s Heidelberg University.

“The former currently dominates the armed forces, the latter the ruling coalition. It is thus in their mutual interests to remain together,” he said.

The military was widely seen as being behind Abhisit’s sudden decision on Sunday to agree to televised talks with the Red Shirts, after previously refusing all negotiation until they left the streets.

And many believe the army must have agreed to Abhisit’s offer — rejected by the Red Shirts — to call elections a year early, at the end of this year.

If the polls were held even earlier it might upset a transition of power in the army, with Anupong due to retire in October.

He is pushing his No. 2, General Prayuth Chan-ocha, to succeed him but — despite the army’s clout — the appointment must be signed off by the government.

So it would have been “extremely unusual” if an election date was discussed for before the Oct. 1 military reshuffle, said Chris Baker, a Bangkok-based Thailand expert and biographer of Thaksin.

In recent months, Thai media have pored over signs of splits within army ranks and ruminated over persistent rumors of a fresh coup being plotted in the background.

But Chambers said the military was likely to keep up the pressure in private rather than stage another coup, allowing the country to maintain a “veneer of electoral democracy.”

“It is more convenient to allow an elected prime minister to face potential public scorn while the armed forces reap the rewards of enhanced prerogatives behind the scenes,” Chambers said.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top