India and Pakistan, implacable South Asian rivals, are locked in a new struggle for influence in Afghanistan, which analysts say is fuelling attacks on Indian interests there.
A suicide bomb assault in Kabul last week killed seven Indians, including government employees, which followed two bomb attacks at the Indian embassy in July 2008 and October last year.
“The attacks are aimed at forcing India to withdraw from Afghanistan,” said Rahul Roy-Chaudhury, a South Asia specialist at the London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies.
“Both India and Pakistan are trying to limit each other’s influence as they have competing interests,” he said.
After more than two decades without sway in Kabul, India swiftly established diplomatic ties with the new government there after the 2001 US-led invasion deposed the extremist Taliban.
New Delhi has poured money into the country since, becoming the largest regional donor with US$1.3 billion in aid.
About 4,000 Indians are busy building roads, sanitation projects and power lines in the volatile country. Even the new Afghan parliament is being built by Indians.
It is this steadily accumulating “soft power” in a country Pakistan sees as its backyard that has stoked insecurities in Islamabad, analysts say.
“Pakistan has existential concerns about Indian involvement in Afghanistan, as they see it as a form of encirclement aimed at the weakening or dismemberment of Pakistan,” said J. Alexander Thier of the Washington-based United States Institute of Peace.
“Pakistan relies on Afghanistan for ‘strategic depth’ — it would support Pakistan in the event of another war with India, including providing a retreat area for overwhelmed conventional forces,” said Thier, a specialist on Afghanistan and Pakistan.
In Islamabad, the government is clear that it sees India’s involvement in Afghanistan as a danger and an “unnecessary complication.”
“We have strong evidence [that India is] using Afghanistan against Pakistan’s interests and to destabilize Pakistan,” Pakistani foreign ministry spokesman Abdul Basit said, without elaborating.
“Obviously we do have concerns vis-a-vis India,” he added.
Pakistan and India have fought three wars since their independence in 1947, two of them sparked by the divided region of Kashmir. A third was over East Pakistan, now Bangladesh.
They started a slow-moving peace process in 2004 to settle all outstanding issues, which was derailed in November 2008 when gunmen attacked the Indian city of Mumbai, killing 166 people.
New Delhi accuses Pakistan of supporting militants that target India and the government saw the hand of the Pakistani intelligence agencies in the embassy attacks in Kabul.
“Increasingly Pakistan and India have become engaged in some kind of proxy war in Afghanistan,” Pakistani analyst Rahimullah Yusufzai said.
“That is not only destabilizing Afghanistan, but also [having an impact] on the very uneasy relationship between Pakistan and India,” he said.
C.U. Bhaskar, who heads the National Maritime Foundation think tank in New Delhi, agrees.
“All these terrorist attacks have linkages with Pakistan either by way of material support or sanctuary [for the perpetrators],” he said.
Pakistan denies supporting militants and points to its own bloody fight against the Taliban in Pakistan, which has been blamed for an intensifying campaign of blasts and suicide attacks in the country.
Recent arrests of Afghan Taliban leaders in Pakistan have also provided signs that Islamabad is prepared to crack down on the extremists.
“We would like peace and stability in Afghanistan sooner rather than later,” Basit said. “There is no other country more interested than Pakistan in having peace in Afghanistan,” he said.
During and since the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979, Pakistan has supported hardline Islamic rebels, including the Taliban militia that came to power in 1996.
Thier said the takeover of the Taliban in 1996 made India wake up to the treat of extremism in Afghanistan.
“Extremism is an internal threat to India, potentially radicalizing Indian Muslims as well as creating the likelihood of more terror attacks directed at India,” he said.
James Watson — the Nobel laureate co-credited with the pivotal discovery of DNA’s double-helix structure, but whose career was later tainted by his repeated racist remarks — has died, his former lab said on Friday. He was 97. The eminent biologist died on Thursday in hospice care on Long Island in New York, announced the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, where he was based for much of his career. Watson became among the 20th century’s most storied scientists for his 1953 breakthrough discovery of the double helix with researcher partner Francis Crick. Along with Crick and Maurice Wilkins, he shared the
OUTRAGE: The former strongman was accused of corruption and responsibility for the killings of hundreds of thousands of political opponents during his time in office Indonesia yesterday awarded the title of national hero to late president Suharto, provoking outrage from rights groups who said the move was an attempt to whitewash decades of human rights abuses and corruption that took place during his 32 years in power. Suharto was a US ally during the Cold War who presided over decades of authoritarian rule, during which up to 1 million political opponents were killed, until he was toppled by protests in 1998. He was one of 10 people recognized by Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto in a televised ceremony held at the presidential palace in Jakarta to mark National
US President Donald Trump handed Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban a one-year exemption from sanctions for buying Russian oil and gas after the close right-wing allies held a chummy White House meeting on Friday. Trump slapped sanctions on Moscow’s two largest oil companies last month after losing patience with Russian President Vladimir Putin over his refusal to end the nearly four-year-old invasion of Ukraine. However, while Trump has pushed other European countries to stop buying oil that he says funds Moscow’s war machine, Orban used his first trip to the White House since Trump’s return to power to push for
LANDMARK: After first meeting Trump in Riyadh in May, al-Sharaa’s visit to the White House today would be the first by a Syrian leader since the country’s independence Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa arrived in the US on Saturday for a landmark official visit, his country’s state news agency SANA reported, a day after Washington removed him from a terrorism blacklist. Sharaa, whose rebel forces ousted long-time former Syrian president Bashar al-Assad late last year, is due to meet US President Donald Trump at the White House today. It is the first such visit by a Syrian president since the country’s independence in 1946, according to analysts. The interim leader met Trump for the first time in Riyadh during the US president’s regional tour in May. US envoy to Syria Tom Barrack earlier
RSS