For the past decade, the effort to muster an alliance of nations to fight climate change has seemed at times like a train wreck in slow motion.
In Copenhagen last week, there were moments when that crash finally — horribly — appeared to have happened. The UN had billed Dec. 18, 2009, as the date when all countries would rally under its banner and forge a strategy to combat the greatest threat facing humanity this century.
Instead, the day will be recalled for the chaotic haggling among a select group of a couple of dozen top leaders. They put together a non-binding deal — essentially the lowest common-denominator — that not only left climate action lodged in low gear but also drove a wedge in the world community.
Only by gaveling the document through a plenary session, to the fury of developing nations who said they had been ignored, was the UN able to stop the “Copenhagen Accord” from being strangled at birth.
Diplomats interviewed were appalled at the backroom circus, the crippling damage to global consensus and the failure of a two-year process to spell out ambitious targets on emissions curbs, for 2020 and 2050, that will brake global warming.
In the rush to understand the fiasco, some pointed at the nightmarish complexity of climate negotiations, while others blamed the DNA of the nation-state itself.
“The biggest backlash from what has happened will be directed at the UN system, not on climate change,” a European official said.
He and others voiced exasperation with the negotiation architecture under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).
This 194-member arena proceeds by consensus and a sheep-and-goats division of rich and poor, which in turn has big repercussions for commitments for curbing greenhouse-gas emissions.
These rules were enshrined at the UNFCCC’s birth in 1992 at the famous Rio Earth Summit and are virtually sacrosanct. Poor countries are understandably loth to give up the privileges they have on emissions controls: Their number still includes South Korea and Singapore, whose GDP per capita is now among the highest in the world.
Then there is the mountain of complex issues, from finance for poor countries, emissions credits and verification of pledges to reporting of national emissions and the counting of forest “sinks.”
These offer nearly infinite potential for foot-dragging and textual sabotage.
When the UNFCCC, and in 1997 its offshoot the Kyoto Protocol, came into being, time seemed plentiful and consensus, despite its flaws, was deemed vital.
Few people guessed that, within less than two decades, climate change would advance so quickly and so viciously as it has today, or that China, India and Brazil would become massive carbon polluters so quickly.
The end result is that the UNFCCC is like a crawling, overladen fire truck that has been told to race to quench a blaze.
“We have seen all the limits of the system in the past two weeks, in terms of unity, the endless series of interventions and points of order,” the European source said.
Another question is whether nation states have it in their genes to address a worldwide challenge, for national leaders defend national interests, not the planet’s.
Rajendra Pachauri, chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), cautioned the talks were “an important test” of whether nations could join together to fight a common threat.
“I think if we are able to get a good agreement, this would clearly create an enormous amount of confidence in the ability of human society to be able to act on a multilateral basis,” the UN’s top climate scientist said last week.
BACKLASH: The National Party quit its decades-long partnership with the Liberal Party after their election loss to center-left Labor, which won a historic third term Australia’s National Party has split from its conservative coalition partner of more than 60 years, the Liberal Party, citing policy differences over renewable energy and after a resounding loss at a national election this month. “Its time to have a break,” Nationals leader David Littleproud told reporters yesterday. The split shows the pressure on Australia’s conservative parties after Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s center-left Labor party won a historic second term in the May 3 election, powered by a voter backlash against US President Donald Trump’s policies. Under the long-standing partnership in state and federal politics, the Liberal and National coalition had shared power
A Croatian town has come up with a novel solution to solve the issue of working parents when there are no public childcare spaces available: pay grandparents to do it. Samobor, near the capital, Zagreb, has become the first in the country to run a “Grandmother-Grandfather Service,” which pays 360 euros (US$400) a month per child. The scheme allows grandparents to top up their pension, but the authorities also hope it will boost family ties and tackle social isolation as the population ages. “The benefits are multiple,” Samobor Mayor Petra Skrobot told reporters. “Pensions are rather low and for parents it is sometimes
CONTROVERSY: During the performance of Israel’s entrant Yuval Raphael’s song ‘New Day Will Rise,’ loud whistles were heard and two people tried to get on stage Austria’s JJ yesterday won the Eurovision Song Contest, with his operatic song Wasted Love triumphing at the world’s biggest live music television event. After votes from national juries around Europe and viewers from across the continent and beyond, JJ gave Austria its first victory since bearded drag performer Conchita Wurst’s 2014 triumph. After the nail-biting drama as the votes were revealed running into yesterday morning, Austria finished with 436 points, ahead of Israel — whose participation drew protests — on 357 and Estonia on 356. “Thank you to you, Europe, for making my dreams come true,” 24-year-old countertenor JJ, whose
A documentary whose main subject, 25-year-old photojournalist Fatima Hassouna, was killed in an Israeli airstrike in Gaza weeks before it premiered at Cannes stunned viewers into silence at the festival on Thursday. As the cinema lights came back on, filmmaker Sepideh Farsi held up an image of the young Palestinian woman killed with younger siblings on April 16, and encouraged the audience to stand up and clap to pay tribute. “To kill a child, to kill a photographer is unacceptable,” Farsi said. “There are still children to save. It must be done fast,” the exiled Iranian filmmaker added. With Israel
RSS