Valuing truth over the right to privacy, Argentina’s Congress has authorized the forced extraction of DNA from people who may have been born to political prisoners slain a quarter-century ago — even when they don’t want to know their birth parents.
Human rights activists hope the new law will help find about 400 people stolen as babies, many from women who were kidnapped and gave birth inside clandestine torture centers during the 1976 to 1983 dictatorship. Thousands of leftists disappeared in what became known as the “dirty war” against political dissent.
Others see the law as government intrusion, legalizing the violation of a person’s very identity. And as written, it could have much broader implications, enabling DNA to be sought from anyone whenever a judge determines the evidence to be “absolutely necessary.”
Children of the “disappeared” were often given to military or police families considered loyal to the military government. Some have grown up not even knowing they were adopted until activists or judges announced efforts to obtain their DNA.
The project of the Grandmothers of the Plaza de Mayo, close allies of Argentine President Cristina Fernandez, was approved by a 58-1 vote of the Senate on Wednesday. Since it has already passed in the lower house, it will become law once it is published in Argentina’s official bulletin.
Recovering their grandchildren has been a priority for the group since they first began demonstrating in front of the presidential palace in 1977, carrying pictures of their disappeared relatives.
DNA technology has helped them identify 98 of 500 children they believe were born in prison or kidnapped as infants.
Using survivors’ testimony, documents from birth families and adoption records, they have persuaded some judges to seek DNA from suspected victims of the “dirty war.” But courts have sometimes ruled that a child’s right to privacy outweighs a grandmother’s right to know.
The new law legalizes the extraction of “minimal amounts of blood, saliva, skin, hair or other biological samples” to determine identity. If a person refuses to provide a sample, a judge can issue a warrant for material from a hairbrush, toothbrush, clothing or other objects.
“It’s an absolute invasion of the right to biological privacy,” constitutional lawyer Gregorio Badeni told reporters. “No one has the right to know what I have inside my body. That belongs only to me. I can give it up voluntarily, but no one can obligate me to deliver it.”
Estela de Carlotto, the head of the grandmothers group, said that she disagrees.
By allowing officials to extract DNA from personal effects, the law “doesn’t violate in any way the body or the privacy,” she said.
The Argentine law may be unprecedented in requiring tests of people who aren’t suspected of crimes, said Marcy Darnovsky, associate executive director for the Center for Genetics and Society in Berkeley, California.
Large forensic DNA databases in Britain and the US have generated controversy because they include people who have been arrested but not convicted or, in some cases, even charged. Pilot projects in Britain, the US and France that used DNA tests to confirm family ties of asylum seekers also have raised ethical concerns.
“If an adult doesn’t want to know his origins, you have to respect it,” said Julio Strassera, a former prosecutor who put top military leaders on trial.
RSS