Israel warned Palestinians on Monday that declaring a state without concluding a peace agreement would lead to Israeli counter-measures that could include annexation of more of the occupied West Bank.
“If the Palestinians take such a unilateral line, Israel should also consider ... passing a law to annex some of the settlements,” Israeli Environment Minister Gilad Erdan, a close ally of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, told Israel Radio.
Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, speaking to reporters, declined to specify what action Israel might take.
But he said: “It is clear any such step by the Palestinians would not pass without an Israeli response.”
Without setting a timeframe, Palestinian officials said on Sunday the Palestinians planned to go to the UN Security Council in an effort to secure international support for an independent state in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
Palestinians attributed the move to frustration at the lack of progress in peace talks, which have been stalled for a year. Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas has said negotiations cannot resume until Israel halts settlement expansion.
US senators visiting the Middle East said Washington would veto a Palestinian declaration of statehood in the UN Security Council. They said it would go nowhere and urged Arab states to stop it.
“It would be D.O.A. — dead on arrival,” Democratic Senator Ted Kaufman said. “It’s a waste of time.”
US State Department spokesman Ian Kelly would not say if Washington would veto any such Palestinian declaration.
“I can’t say we’re going to veto something we haven’t seen or hasn’t even been proposed yet ...we support a Palestinian state that arises as a result of a process between the two parties,” he said.
Diplomats deferred comment, saying it was not immediately obvious by what means the Palestinians might pursue a declaration of statehood, or how international law might apply.
Recent examples suggest they might take the same route as Israel’s founders in 1947 and simply seek UN support for a resolution calling for statehood, which is what East Timor did to become the first new state of the 21st century in 2002.
Or they might declare independence without going to the UN as Kosovo did when it became the world’s newest state last year, knowing it could not win Security Council endorsement because of a threatened Russian veto, but would receive quick recognition by most NATO and EU governments.
The Palestinian remarks on possible unilateral steps prompted a warning from Netanyahu. He said in a speech on Sunday only peace talks with Israel would secure a Palestinian state.
Senior Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat said that the aim of the initiative was not to declare statehood but was meant to preserve the two-state option and to formalize international support for the nation the Palestinians want to establish.
“Heading to the Security Council to issue a resolution recognizing an independent Palestinian state ... differs entirely from a unilateral declaration of a Palestinian state. The PLO [Palestine Liberation Organization] is not proposing the option of declaring a state unilaterally,” Erekat said in a statement.
Erdan, in the radio interview, discussed other sanctions open to Israel, which captured the West Bank in a 1967 war and annexed some of the territory along with Arab East Jerusalem.
RSS