Sat, Aug 15, 2009 - Page 7 News List

Bush went soft on terror war: Cheney

GETTING EVEN: The former US vice president has reportedly said: ‘I have strong feelings about what happened’ and ‘the statute of limitations has expired’ on some secrets

THE GUARDIAN AND AP , LONDON AND WASHINGTON

Former US vice president Dick Cheney grew increasingly disenchanted with US president George W. Bush during the latter’s second term, believing the president was going soft in the so-called war on terror, it emerged on Wednesday.

The rift came to light as the Cheney, the driving force behind many of Bush’s hardline actions — the invasion of Iraq, the torture of terrorist suspects — discussed his memoir, due out in 2011, with former colleagues, policy experts and diplomats, the Washington Post reported on Wednesday

What emerged from the latest account of Cheney’s disgruntlement was that he thought Bush had gone soft in the last years of his presidency as he veered away from the “you are with us or you are against us” approach following the Sept. 11 attacks.

In the last days of his administration, Bush halted the use of waterboarding for terrorist suspects, closed secret CIA prisons, sought congressional approval for domestic surveillance and put out feelers to Iran and North Korea, which he had previously denounced as part of the “axis of evil.”

Those who have been speaking to the former vice-president say that shift stuck in Cheney’s craw.

“In the second term, he felt Bush was moving away from him,” an unnamed source told the Post. “He said Bush was shackled by the public reaction and the criticism he took. Bush was more malleable to that. The implication was that Bush had gone soft on him, or rather Bush had hardened against Cheney’s advice. He’d showed an independence that Cheney didn’t see coming.”

In contrast to Bush, who has maintained a discreet silence since US President Barack Obama’s election, Cheney has rebuked the new president as the Democrat disavows one Bush policy after another, such as the closing of Guantanamo Bay. Cheney has been rather more committed than his former boss in defending the Bush legacy.

The first inkling of Cheney’s disenchantment came in a long account in Time magazine of his failed attempt to win a presidential pardon for his aide Lewis Libby. Despite much badgering, Bush refused to pardon Libby, who was convicted in 2007 of perjury and the obstruction of an investigation into the outing of Valerie Plame as a CIA agent.

Robert Barnett, who negotiated Cheney’s book contract, passed word to potential publishers that the memoir would be packed with news, said the article published on the Post Web site, and Cheney himself has said, without explanation, that “the statute of limitations has expired” on many of his secrets.

The book will cover Cheney’s long career from chief of staff under former US president Gerald Ford to vice president under Bush.

“When the president made decisions that I didn’t agree with, I still supported him and didn’t go out and undercut him,” Cheney said, according to Stephen Hayes, his authorized biographer. “Now we’re talking about after we’ve left office. I have strong feelings about what happened … And I don’t have any reason not to forthrightly express those views.”

According to the author of the Post piece, Barton Gellman, who earlier wrote a book on Cheney called Angler, the former vice president believes Bush made concessions to public sentiment, something Cheney views as moral weakness. After years of praising Bush as a man of resolve, Cheney now intimates that the former president turned out to be more like an ordinary politician in the end, Gellman says.

This story has been viewed 1556 times.
TOP top