Fri, Mar 27, 2009 - Page 6 News List

Israel accused over bomb use

WHITE PHOSPHORUS The exploding shells are used by armies to produce a smoke screen, but Israel is said to have fired them indiscriminately at Palestinian civilians

AP , JERUSALEM

Unexploded white phosphorus canisters and shells are gathered at a site in Gaza City by Palestinian demining teams in a photo provided on Wednesday by Human Rights Watch.

PHOTO: AP

Israel fired white phosphorous shells indiscriminately over densely populated areas of Gaza in what amounts to a war crime, Human Rights Watch said in a report on Wednesday.

The New York-based group called on the UN to launch an investigation into alleged violations of the rules of war, both by Israel and Hamas, during the three-week Gaza war.

The Israeli military said on Wednesday that the shells were used in line with international law.

“The claim that smoke shells were used indiscriminately, or to threaten the civilian population, is baseless,” the military said in a statement.

International law permits the use of phosphorous weapons as flares or to create smoke screens masking the movement of troops.

However, Human Rights Watch said Israeli troops frequently fired the shells over densely populated areas. The firing “was indiscriminate and is evidence of war crimes,” the report said.

The group documented only some of the cases, including white phosphorous shells fired at a Gaza City hospital, the UN headquarters, a school and a market. In six attacks, 12 civilians were killed and dozens wounded, Human Rights Watch researcher Fred Abrahams said.

Each shell bursts into 116 burning white phosphorous wedges, over a radius of more than 125m. The wedges burn on contact with oxygen, creating intense heat, and can cause severe burns. The phosphorous kept burning for many days, and was still smoldering well after Israel’s withdrawal on Jan. 18.

Abrahams said the Israeli military was aware of the destructive nature of white phosphorous. Army medical officers warned during the war that the weapon was “potentially extremely destructive to tissue,” an internal army document attached to the report said.

Israel’s use of white phosphorous violated the laws of war, Abrahams said.

“They knew perfectly well what danger white phosphorous poses to civilians,” Abrahams said. “Their own documents prove it. They know that these areas were densely populated. Yet they fired it not once, not twice, but repeatedly into densely populated areas.”

Israel could have used less dangerous smoke screens produced by an Israeli company, Abrahams said.

He called for an investigation by the UN secretary-general or the UN Security Council into all of Israel’s alleged violations of the rules of war, including the use of white phosphorous. Hamas, which indiscriminately fires rockets at Israeli civilians, should also be investigated, the group said.

The US supplied the white phosphorous to Israel and should launch its own investigation into whether the shells were used illegally, he said. Hamas should also be investigated for war crimes, including indiscriminate rocket fire into Israeli border towns, Human Rights Watch said.

Lieutenant Colonel Shane Cohen, a reserve artillery officer, said that white phosphorous shells were also used in the British and US armies. He said shells would not be fired as smoke screens if civilians were present.

“The enemy might be behind the civilians, and you want to put the smoke screen in the middle, so you’re going to think more than twice, and nearly for sure, you’re not going to be firing it,” he said.

Israel launched its Gaza offensive on Dec. 27 in an attempt to halt rocket fire and weaken the territory’s Hamas rulers. More than 1,400 Palestinians, including more than 900 civilians, were killed in the war, a Palestinian human rights group said. Thirteen Israelis were also killed.

This story has been viewed 2087 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top