A key congressional committee will try to settle the public debate over the CIA’s harsh interrogation program by investigating whether those methods actually worked, US Senate officials said on Thursday.
The Senate Intelligence Committee’s investigation is an attempt to inject fact into an argument that is often shaped by anecdotes and news reports. Officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to disclose details of the committee’s discussions.
US President Barack Obama halted the CIA’s interrogation program last month. The spy agency is now prohibited from employing methods not approved for use by the US military while the program undergoes a White House review to determine whether additional interrogation methods may be necessary.
The Senate committee review seeks to document what actually happened during CIA interrogations and whether valuable information was gained that would not have been obtained otherwise. A report is expected to be released in six months to a year.
The Senate probe is not meant as a first step toward prosecuting CIA officers who used harsh interrogations, the officials said.
Obama administration officials have said they will not seek charges against those who were following guidelines set by the attorney general.
The Intelligence Committee is already investigating the CIA’s destruction in 2007 of videotapes of the interrogation of Abu Zubaydah to encompass the origins and effectiveness of the so-called “enhanced interrogation program” authorized by former US president George W. Bush. Scores of secret documents have already been assembled by the committee.
The CIA’s enhanced interrogation methods are secret. But former CIA director Michael Hayden told reporters in January that the tactics — at one point they included waterboarding, which simulates drowning — were effective in eliciting information from the more hardened terror suspects who are taken prisoner.
The CIA held fewer than 100 prisoners at secret detention sites and used enhanced interrogation techniques on about a third of them, Hayden said. He said just three underwent waterboarding, with 2003 the last time it was used.
“I am convinced that the program got the maximum amount of information, particularly out of that first generation of detainees. The Abu Zubaydahs, the Khalid Sheik Muhammeds,” Hayden said, referring to top al-Qaeda operatives who were detained and questioned with harsh techniques.
“I just can’t conceive of any other way, given their character, given their commitment to what it is they do,” Hayden said.
Current CIA Director Leon Panetta, however, is less convinced.
“My personal view at this stage is that the Army Field Manual gives us all of the tools we need,” Panetta said on Thursday at his first on-the-record meeting with reporters.
Committee member Senator Ron Wyden, a Democrat and a Senate confidante of Obama’s, said last month that declassifying many of the top-secret documents collected for the videotape investigation would reveal whether severe methods yielded useful intelligence and what the legal arguments were for allowing them.
Critics of coercive interrogation programs say they do not work because those subjected to them will say whatever they think the interrogator wants to hear to make the interrogation stop.
Conversely, they say coercive methods can increase resistance because they confirm the prisoner’s preconceived notions about their jailers and increase a sense of righteous martyrdom.
They contend the most effective methods are those that build both dependence and rapport between the subject and the interrogator, making the subject want to provide accurate information.
Advocates of harsh interrogations say some prisoners are trained to resist standard interrogation techniques and only more coercive methods will break their will and convince them that resistance is futile.
They also say sometimes there is not enough time to build a rapport to get needed information, the so-called “ticking bomb” scenario.
Republican US lawmakers on Friday criticized US President Joe Biden’s administration after sanctioned Chinese telecoms equipment giant Huawei unveiled a laptop this week powered by an Intel artificial intelligence (AI) chip. The US placed Huawei on a trade restriction list in 2019 for contravening Iran sanctions, part of a broader effort to hobble Beijing’s technological advances. Placement on the list means the company’s suppliers have to seek a special, difficult-to-obtain license before shipping to it. One such license, issued by then-US president Donald Trump’s administration, has allowed Intel to ship central processors to Huawei for use in laptops since 2020. China hardliners
A top Vietnamese property tycoon was on Thursday sentenced to death in one of the biggest corruption cases in history, with an estimated US$27 billion in damages. A panel of three hand-picked jurors and two judges rejected all defense arguments by Truong My Lan, chair of major developer Van Thinh Phat, who was found guilty of swindling cash from Saigon Commercial Bank (SCB) over a decade. “The defendant’s actions ... eroded people’s trust in the leadership of the [Communist] Party and state,” read the verdict at the trial in Ho Chi Minh City. After the five-week trial, 85 others were also sentenced on
Conjoined twins Lori and George Schappell, who pursued separate careers, interests and relationships during lives that defied medical expectations, died this month in Pennsylvania, funeral home officials said. They were 62. The twins, listed by Guinness World Records as the oldest living conjoined twins, died on April 7 at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, obituaries posted by Leibensperger Funeral Homes of Hamburg said. The cause of death was not detailed. “When we were born, the doctors didn’t think we’d make 30, but we proved them wrong,” Lori said in an interview when they turned 50, the Philadelphia Inquirer reported. The
RAMPAGE: A Palestinian man was left dead after dozens of Israeli settlers searching for a missing 14-year-old boy stormed a village in the Israeli-occupied West Bank US President Joe Biden on Friday said he expected Iran to attack Israel “sooner, rather than later” and warned Tehran not to proceed. Asked by reporters about his message to Iran, Biden simply said: “Don’t,” underscoring Washington’s commitment to defend Israel. “We are devoted to the defense of Israel. We will support Israel. We will help defend Israel and Iran will not succeed,” he said. Biden said he would not divulge secure information, but said his expectation was that an attack could come “sooner, rather than later.” Israel braced on Friday for an attack by Iran or its proxies as warnings grew of