People living in greenhouses shouldn’t throw stones, right?
I put that up front because we’re all being asked to make sacrifices to save the planet and the easiest thing in the world is to lecture everyone else.
I can’t afford to. You see, I’ve been calculating my carbon footprint. You can do it too, through a number of Web sites. I used www.climateers.org/eng/change/carbon.php.
What I learned doesn’t mean much to me. My carbon emissions for the year, on this crude calculation, amount to 61.39 tonnes. I generate 2.74 tonnes of carbon dioxide at home, a good chunk of that from using air conditioning to sleep in the dripping humidity of a Hong Kong summer.
I am a pillar of virtue when it comes to transport — just 1.52 tonnes. I don’t own a car. In Hong Kong there’s no need. Natural gas-powered taxis are plentiful and cheap, public transport safe, clean and convenient, and walking gets me to shops, favorite watering holes and to the homes of many of my friends.
That’s where the good news ends.
Nearly 90 percent of my carbon footprint, 54.31 tonnes of carbon dioxide, comes from flying.
A lot of people I know fly a lot more. Hong Kong is full of bankers, lawyers, analysts, businesspeople, entrepreneurs, managers, marketers and academics wearing a track into the carpets at Hong Kong airport. Many fly at least once a week, typically to China, Korea or Japan.
The bleak reality, though, is that I could sanctify myself with compact fluorescent light bulbs, cooler and shorter showers, fewer taxis and more bus rides, eat local produce rather than fancy imported muesli — all that stuff — and it would barely register.
I have got to stop flying.
Now, if I were serious about that, I would quit my job. Most of my flying is for CNN. I have been a reporter long enough to know that you can’t do the serious stuff by phone. The Sichuan earthquake, the violence in Iraq and the normal coverage of events across East and Southeast Asia are properly done by looking at things first-hand.
But giving up a job and a calling I like — to say nothing of the income that sustains my family — is too big a sacrifice to seriously contemplate. And someone else would simply do it instead, right? Similar rationalizations doubtless run through the minds of everyone else I bump into in the flight lounges.
But what about personal travel? In April, I took a family holiday to India. My two-year-old still talks of the Taj Mahal and seeing an elephant poo. My older daughter is about to go on a school exchange to Connecticut. In the past couple of years we have traveled together in Cambodia, Vietnam and New Zealand and taken long-distance trains in China. I want my kids to know the world, to feel its width and richness and beauty.
Later this year, I will fly the lot of us to New Zealand to celebrate my father’s 80th birthday and my parents’ 50th wedding anniversary. That’s a lot of carbon dioxide.
Worse still, in November, I will fly to Australia for two whole days to see my older daughter dance the lead in Nutcracker. I am already bursting with pride.
For me, personal travel is about family. Which sounds great. Even noble. But I also want my kids — and yours — to grow up in a livable planet. And if you’re reading this saying, “selfish b—”, I couldn’t blame you.
To give up personal travel, one of the abiding joys of my life — you might even say one of the purposes of my life — really would be a sacrifice. But no other sacrifice is meaningful if travel is not included. Seems I’ve got some thinking to do.
So here’s my question. Have you made any real, rather than token, sacrifices in the name of global warming? What was it? And how do you feel about it now?
Post an online comment to “Sound Off” below my blog at www.cnn.com/goinggreen.
Hugh Riminton’s final entry in his “Going Green” diary appears tomorrow in the Taipei Times. CNN’s special coverage of “Going Green: Search for Solutions” continues until Sunday.
‘SHORTSIGHTED’: Using aid as leverage is punitive, would not be regarded well among Pacific Island nations and would further open the door for China, an academic said New Zealand has suspended millions of dollars in budget funding to the Cook Islands, it said yesterday, as the relationship between the two constitutionally linked countries continues to deteriorate amid the island group’s deepening ties with China. A spokesperson for New Zealand Minister of Foreign Affairs Winston Peters said in a statement that New Zealand early this month decided to suspend payment of NZ$18.2 million (US$11 million) in core sector support funding for this year and next year as it “relies on a high trust bilateral relationship.” New Zealand and Australia have become increasingly cautious about China’s growing presence in the Pacific
The team behind the long-awaited Vera Rubin Observatory in Chile yesterday published their first images, revealing breathtaking views of star-forming regions as well as distant galaxies. More than two decades in the making, the giant US-funded telescope sits perched at the summit of Cerro Pachon in central Chile, where dark skies and dry air provide ideal conditions for observing the cosmos. One of the debut images is a composite of 678 exposures taken over just seven hours, capturing the Trifid Nebula and the Lagoon Nebula — both several thousand light-years from Earth — glowing in vivid pinks against orange-red backdrops. The new image
Canada and the EU on Monday signed a defense and security pact as the transatlantic partners seek to better confront Russia, with worries over Washington’s reliability under US President Donald Trump. The deal was announced after a summit in Brussels between Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and European Council President Antonio Costa. “While NATO remains the cornerstone of our collective defense, this partnership will allow us to strengthen our preparedness ... to invest more and to invest smarter,” Costa told a news conference. “It opens new opportunities for companies on both sides of the
ESPIONAGE: The British government’s decision on the proposed embassy hinges on the security of underground data cables, a former diplomat has said A US intervention over China’s proposed new embassy in London has thrown a potential resolution “up in the air,” campaigners have said, amid concerns over the site’s proximity to a sensitive hub of critical communication cables. The furor over a new “super-embassy” on the edge of London’s financial district was reignited last week when the White House said it was “deeply concerned” over potential Chinese access to “the sensitive communications of one of our closest allies.” The Dutch parliament has also raised concerns about Beijing’s ideal location of Royal Mint Court, on the edge of the City of London, which has so
RSS