Print

Mail

wiki links

New Jersey lawmakers mull slavery apology

"If slavery was the price that a modern American's ancestors had to pay in order to make one an American, one should get down on one's knees every single day and thank the Lord that such price was paid."

Michael Patrick Carroll, Republican New Jersey lawmaker

New Jersey lawmakers begin considering this week a measure that would make theirs the first northern US state to offer an expression of regret for slavery, an institution that one Republican lawmaker said blacks should remember led to their becoming Americans.

The resolution, which is to be discussed in a state Assembly committee on Thursday, expresses "profound regret" for the state's role in slavery and apologizes for the wrongs inflicted by slavery.

If approved, it would make New Jersey the fifth US state to offer an apology or expression of regret for the institution.

But ahead of the slavery resolution's consideration, Republican lawmakers spoke out against the bid, with one saying it would be meaningless.

"Who living today is guilty of slave holding and thus capable of apologizing for the offense?" Republican Assemblyman Richard Merkt asked. "And who living today is a former slave and thus capable of accepting the apology?"

Another Republican, Assemblyman Michael Patrick Carroll, said Democrats should start by asking their own party to apologize, noting the historic Republican opposition to slavery.

"If slavery was the price that a modern American's ancestors had to pay in order to make one an American, one should get down on one's knees every single day and thank the Lord that such price was paid," Carroll said.

Carroll said while his ancestors came from Ireland, fleeing a potato famine he said was worsened by British indifference, he bore the British no ill will.

"Far from holding it against the modern British, I delight in the cruelty of their forebearers. Without same, I might be hanging around in Inisfree," Carroll said, referencing an Irish island.

History "is not something for which anyone can -- or should be expected to -- atone," Carroll said.

"To the extent that America -- or New Jersey -- ever owed any kind of debt to anyone, that debt was more than repaid through the blood and suffering of 650,000 federal soldiers who died or were wounded during the war provoked by slavery," Carroll said, referring to the Union Army's losses in the Civil War, which pitted the North against the Confederate South between 1861 and 1865.

Four Southern states have so far offered varying apologies for slavery -- Alabama, Maryland, North Carolina and Virginia.

New Jersey's measure, which expresses "profound regret for the state's role in slavery and apologizes for the wrongs inflicted by slavery and its aftereffects in the United States of America," was set for a hearing today by the Assembly Appropriations Committee.

It states that in New Jersey, "the vestiges of slavery are ever before African-American citizens, from the overt racism of hate groups to the subtle racism encountered when requesting health care, transacting business, buying a home, seeking quality public education and college admission, and enduring pretextual traffic stops and other indignities."

Democratic Assemblyman William Payne, a sponsor of the resolution, argued that if the states that most supported slavery can proffer apologies, then so can New Jersey.

"This is not too much to ask of the state of New Jersey," Payne said.

The proposal says New Jersey had one of the largest slave populations in the northern colonies, was the last northern state to free slaves and was the last northeast state to abolish slavery, doing so in 1846.

Merkt, explaining his opposition to the measure, said many residents descend from families who came to the US after the Civil War and have no link to slave holding.

"Today's residents of New Jersey, even those who can trace their ancestry back to either slaves or slave holders, bear no collective guilt or responsibility," Merkt said.

No state has offered reparations to slave descendants, and New Jersey's measure states that the resolution cannot be used in litigation.
This story has been viewed 1283 times.