A federal appeals court dealt a near-fatal blow to an Islamic charity's lawsuit challenging the US administration's warrantless wiretapping program, concluding that a key piece of evidence is protected as a state secret.
The lawsuit, filed by the Oregon-based US arm of the al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, alleged the National Security Agency (NSA) illegally listened to its calls.
The charity had wanted to introduce as evidence a top-secret call log they received mistakenly from the Treasury Department.
But the three-judge panel of the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals said the log could not be used because it fell under the "state secrets" privilege invoked by the government, and without it, the court said, the foundation had little proof it was wiretapped.
The decision, which reversed a lower court ruling, was a victory for the White House, but it didn't entirely put the issue to rest.
The judges sent the case to the US District Court in San Francisco to determine whether the law governing the wiretapping of suspected terrorists trumps the state secrets law.
The foundation has been labeled a terrorist organization by the US government.
The appellate court's ruling also didn't resolve another lawsuit that more broadly challenges the warrantless wiretapping program.
An attorney for al-Haramain said he was pleased with the appellate court's ruling because it gave him another chance to bring a lawsuit under a different argument.
"This is back to the drawing board," lawyer John Eisenberg said. "My case is still very much alive and kicking."
The Department of Justice also applauded the court.
"The 9th Circuit upheld the government's position that release of this information would undermine the government's intelligence capabilities and compromise national security," Department of Justice spokesman Charles Miller said in a statement.
Al-Haramain lawyers voluntarily gave the top-secret document to FBI agents after the mistake was discovered.
The document was described by those who have seen it as an NSA log of calls it had intercepted between the foundation and its US lawyers.
The charity had argued that warrantless eavesdropping of telephone conversations between its directors and lawyers violated the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which established a secret court to issue top secret surveillance warrants authorized by a judge.
Earlier, a federal judge in Oregon ruled that the foundation's lawyers couldn't use the actual document to support their lawsuit but could use their memories of its contents to go forward.
The appeals court called that judge's ruling "a commendable effort to thread the needle," but said it still ran counter to the state secrets law, which precludes the disclosure of sensitive information in court that could jeopardize national security.
"Such an approach countenances a back door around the privilege and would eviscerate the state secret itself," Judge M. Margaret McKeown wrote for the panel. "Once properly invoked and judicially blessed, the state secrets privilege is not a half-way proposition."
In December 2005, the New York Times exposed the administration's warrantless wiretapping program.
That led to reports that the program included widespread interceptions of e-mail traffic and the secret collection of customer data from telecommunications companies without judicial permission.
Since then, hundreds of lawyers, journalists, telecommunications company customers and civil rights organizations have alleged that their right to privacy has been violated.
About 50 lawsuits were filed against the government and telecommunication companies for allegedly turning over customer account information.
BACKLASH: The National Party quit its decades-long partnership with the Liberal Party after their election loss to center-left Labor, which won a historic third term Australia’s National Party has split from its conservative coalition partner of more than 60 years, the Liberal Party, citing policy differences over renewable energy and after a resounding loss at a national election this month. “Its time to have a break,” Nationals leader David Littleproud told reporters yesterday. The split shows the pressure on Australia’s conservative parties after Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s center-left Labor party won a historic second term in the May 3 election, powered by a voter backlash against US President Donald Trump’s policies. Under the long-standing partnership in state and federal politics, the Liberal and National coalition had shared power
CONTROVERSY: During the performance of Israel’s entrant Yuval Raphael’s song ‘New Day Will Rise,’ loud whistles were heard and two people tried to get on stage Austria’s JJ yesterday won the Eurovision Song Contest, with his operatic song Wasted Love triumphing at the world’s biggest live music television event. After votes from national juries around Europe and viewers from across the continent and beyond, JJ gave Austria its first victory since bearded drag performer Conchita Wurst’s 2014 triumph. After the nail-biting drama as the votes were revealed running into yesterday morning, Austria finished with 436 points, ahead of Israel — whose participation drew protests — on 357 and Estonia on 356. “Thank you to you, Europe, for making my dreams come true,” 24-year-old countertenor JJ, whose
NO EXCUSES: Marcos said his administration was acting on voters’ demands, but an academic said the move was emotionally motivated after a poor midterm showing Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr yesterday sought the resignation of all his Cabinet secretaries, in a move seen as an attempt to reset the political agenda and assert his authority over the second half of his single six-year term. The order came after the president’s allies failed to win a majority of Senate seats contested in the 12 polls on Monday last week, leaving Marcos facing a divided political and legislative landscape that could thwart his attempts to have an ally succeed him in 2028. “He’s talking to the people, trying to salvage whatever political capital he has left. I think it’s
A documentary whose main subject, 25-year-old photojournalist Fatima Hassouna, was killed in an Israeli airstrike in Gaza weeks before it premiered at Cannes stunned viewers into silence at the festival on Thursday. As the cinema lights came back on, filmmaker Sepideh Farsi held up an image of the young Palestinian woman killed with younger siblings on April 16, and encouraged the audience to stand up and clap to pay tribute. “To kill a child, to kill a photographer is unacceptable,” Farsi said. “There are still children to save. It must be done fast,” the exiled Iranian filmmaker added. With Israel
RSS