A federal appeals court dealt a near-fatal blow to an Islamic charity's lawsuit challenging the US administration's warrantless wiretapping program, concluding that a key piece of evidence is protected as a state secret.
The lawsuit, filed by the Oregon-based US arm of the al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, alleged the National Security Agency (NSA) illegally listened to its calls.
The charity had wanted to introduce as evidence a top-secret call log they received mistakenly from the Treasury Department.
But the three-judge panel of the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals said the log could not be used because it fell under the "state secrets" privilege invoked by the government, and without it, the court said, the foundation had little proof it was wiretapped.
The decision, which reversed a lower court ruling, was a victory for the White House, but it didn't entirely put the issue to rest.
The judges sent the case to the US District Court in San Francisco to determine whether the law governing the wiretapping of suspected terrorists trumps the state secrets law.
The foundation has been labeled a terrorist organization by the US government.
The appellate court's ruling also didn't resolve another lawsuit that more broadly challenges the warrantless wiretapping program.
An attorney for al-Haramain said he was pleased with the appellate court's ruling because it gave him another chance to bring a lawsuit under a different argument.
"This is back to the drawing board," lawyer John Eisenberg said. "My case is still very much alive and kicking."
The Department of Justice also applauded the court.
"The 9th Circuit upheld the government's position that release of this information would undermine the government's intelligence capabilities and compromise national security," Department of Justice spokesman Charles Miller said in a statement.
Al-Haramain lawyers voluntarily gave the top-secret document to FBI agents after the mistake was discovered.
The document was described by those who have seen it as an NSA log of calls it had intercepted between the foundation and its US lawyers.
The charity had argued that warrantless eavesdropping of telephone conversations between its directors and lawyers violated the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which established a secret court to issue top secret surveillance warrants authorized by a judge.
Earlier, a federal judge in Oregon ruled that the foundation's lawyers couldn't use the actual document to support their lawsuit but could use their memories of its contents to go forward.
The appeals court called that judge's ruling "a commendable effort to thread the needle," but said it still ran counter to the state secrets law, which precludes the disclosure of sensitive information in court that could jeopardize national security.
"Such an approach countenances a back door around the privilege and would eviscerate the state secret itself," Judge M. Margaret McKeown wrote for the panel. "Once properly invoked and judicially blessed, the state secrets privilege is not a half-way proposition."
In December 2005, the New York Times exposed the administration's warrantless wiretapping program.
That led to reports that the program included widespread interceptions of e-mail traffic and the secret collection of customer data from telecommunications companies without judicial permission.
Since then, hundreds of lawyers, journalists, telecommunications company customers and civil rights organizations have alleged that their right to privacy has been violated.
About 50 lawsuits were filed against the government and telecommunication companies for allegedly turning over customer account information.
DOUBLE-MURDER CASE: The officer told the dispatcher he would check the locations of the callers, but instead headed to a pizzeria, remaining there for about an hour A New Jersey officer has been charged with misconduct after prosecutors said he did not quickly respond to and properly investigate reports of a shooting that turned out to be a double murder, instead allegedly stopping at an ATM and pizzeria. Franklin Township Police Sergeant Kevin Bollaro was the on-duty officer on the evening of Aug. 1, when police received 911 calls reporting gunshots and screaming in Pittstown, about 96km from Manhattan in central New Jersey, Hunterdon County Prosecutor Renee Robeson’s office said. However, rather than responding immediately, prosecutors said GPS data and surveillance video showed Bollaro drove about 3km
Tens of thousands of people on Saturday took to the streets of Spain’s eastern city of Valencia to mark the first anniversary of floods that killed 229 people and to denounce the handling of the disaster. Demonstrators, many carrying photos of the victims, called on regional government head Carlos Mazon to resign over what they said was the slow response to one of Europe’s deadliest natural disasters in decades. “People are still really angry,” said Rosa Cerros, a 42-year-old government worker who took part with her husband and two young daughters. “Why weren’t people evacuated? Its incomprehensible,” she said. Mazon’s
‘MOTHER’ OF THAILAND: In her glamorous heyday in the 1960s, former Thai queen Sirikit mingled with US presidents and superstars such as Elvis Presley The year-long funeral ceremony of former Thai queen Sirikit started yesterday, with grieving royalists set to salute the procession bringing her body to lie in state at Bangkok’s Grand Palace. Members of the royal family are venerated in Thailand, treated by many as semi-divine figures, and lavished with glowing media coverage and gold-adorned portraits hanging in public spaces and private homes nationwide. Sirikit, the mother of Thai King Vajiralongkorn and widow of the nation’s longest-reigning monarch, died late on Friday at the age of 93. Black-and-white tributes to the royal matriarch are being beamed onto towering digital advertizing billboards, on
POWER ABUSE WORRY: Some people warned that the broad language of the treaty could lead to overreach by authorities and enable the repression of government critics Countries signed their first UN treaty targeting cybercrime in Hanoi yesterday, despite opposition from an unlikely band of tech companies and rights groups warning of expanded state surveillance. The new global legal framework aims to bolster international cooperation to fight digital crimes, from child pornography to transnational cyberscams and money laundering. More than 60 countries signed the declaration, which means it would go into force once ratified by those states. UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres described the signing as an “important milestone,” and that it was “only the beginning.” “Every day, sophisticated scams destroy families, steal migrants and drain billions of dollars from our economy...
RSS