Tue, Sep 18, 2007 - Page 7 News List

Democrats try to legislate rest for US troops

AP , WASHINGTON

Senate Democrats are confident they can pass legislation to give troops more rest between Iraq deployments, a measure aimed at pressing the US President George W. Bush administration to change its war policy.

US Defense Secretary Robert Gates called the proposal by Democratic Senator Jim Webb a dangerous "backdoor way" to draw down additional forces. Gates said he would recommend a veto.

"If we get this next phase wrong -- no matter how you feel about how we got to where we are, the consequences of getting this wrong for Iraq, for the region, for us are enormous," he said on Sunday.

Senator Jack Reed responded that shorter breaks were creating an undue strain on US troops and their families.

"They deserve the same amount of time back home as they stay in the field," Reed said.

The comments represented the latest political clash over war. Bush last week announced plans for a limited drawdown but indicated combat forces would stay in Iraq well past next year.

The Senate was scheduled to resume debate this week on anti-war legislation, including Webb's proposal to require that troops have as much time at their home station as they do deployed to Iraq.

Gates was asked in broadcast interviews about recommending a Bush veto should the proposal pass.

"Yes I would," the Pentagon chief said.

"If it were enacted, we would have force management problems that would be extremely difficult and, in fact, affect combat effectiveness and perhaps pose greater risk to our troops," he said.

Supporters of Webb's measure say it has at least 57 of the 60 votes needed. It would need 67 votes to override a veto.

A separate proposal by Senator Carl Levin seeks to restrict troops' mission to fighting terrorists and training the Iraqi security force.

"The president has dangled a carrot in front of the American people talking about troop reductions," Levin said. "But, again, it is an illusion of a change of course and the American people are not buying it. My colleagues are not buying it."

"I think we have a good chance of getting to the 60 votes to call for a change in policy. I hope we get there in the next couple of weeks," he said.

If Webb's amendment were enacted, Gates said it would force him to consider again extending tours in Iraq. Military commanders would be constrained in the use of available forces, creating gaps and forcing greater use of the National Guard and Reserve, he said.

"It would be extremely difficult for us to manage that. It really is a backdoor way to try and force the president to accelerate the drawdown," Gates said. "Again, the drawdowns have to be based on the conditions on the ground."

"A unit pulling out would not be immediately replaced by another," he added. "So you'd have an area of combat operations where no US forces would be present for a period, and the troops coming in would then face a much more difficult situation."

Active-duty Army units currently are on 15-month deployments with a promise of no more than 12 months rest. Marines who spend seven or more months at war sometimes get six months or less at home.

Bush said last week that he approved a plan by General David Petraeus, the top US commander in Iraq, to withdraw 5,700 troops from Iraq by the holidays and reduce the force from 20 combat brigades to 15 brigades by next July.

The president has ordered Petraeus to make a further assessment and recommendations in March.

This story has been viewed 2527 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top