Thu, May 24, 2007 - Page 7 News List

Democrats drop 'timeline' bid

SPINNancy Pelosi argued that some progress had been made in forcing the eventual withdrawal of US troops from Iraq, but the US president got the funding he requested

, AFP, WASHINGTON

US Democrats on Tuesday shelved their crusade to condition Iraq war funding on troop withdrawals, but denied handing US President George W. Bush a multibillion dollar victory.

Instead of homecoming soldiers, party leaders reluctantly accepted the first congressionally approved political and security benchmarks for the Iraqi government, a plan ridiculed just last week by a top Democrat as "weak."

They vowed to renew their battle to end US involvement in the war through defense bills looming in the next few months and claimed their weeks-long constitutional showdown had boxed Bush in as never before.

House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi presented the outline of the new funding bill, worth around US$100 billion, to her restive party caucus on Tuesday, billing it as "another stage in the sequencing of ending this war."

Pelosi said September was now the real "moment of truth for this war" as several spending bills come up as well as a report on the progress of Bush's troop surge strategy by top war general, David Petraeus.

Some top Republicans have already said they will either need to see progress by then, or sweeping changes in US strategy in the war, which has killed more than 3,400 US soldiers.

Bush has vowed never to accept timelines for withdrawal, billed by Republicans as "surrender dates" and vetoed a previous US$124 billion spending bill because it included such mechanisms.

Bush was expected yesterday to present newly declassified intelligence charging that al-Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden told the group's late leader in Iraq, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, to plan terror strikes on the US.

The bin Laden-Zarqawi link was made in secret documents that were declassified on Tuesday and shored up Washington's argument that it is fighting in Iraq to prevent the country from becoming a new "sanctuary" for al-Qaeda.

The House was to vote, probably today, on a war funding package and companion legislation containing extra domestic spending and including hurricane relief funding and other spending hikes, included to placate liberal Democrats.

The Senate would then be asked to vote on the package as a whole, said Democratic Representative David Obey, who has been locked in talks with Republicans, top senators and the White House on the funding package.

Democrats, who control both chambers of Congress but lack sufficient votes to override a presidential veto, dismissed the notion that their reluctant dropping of withdrawal timelines handed Bush a hard-won victory.

"I don't think there's any way you could stretch, saying whatever we decide to do in this legislation is a defeat," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said.

"For heaven's sakes, look where we've come. We have come a long, long ways," he said.

Leaders said the budget language would mirror a Republican-backed amendment passed last week and accepted by the White House, which would require Bush to report to Congress on progress in Iraq next month and September.

The bill, framed by Republican Senator John Warner, also raises the prospect of the Iraqi government forfeiting non-military financial aid if it fails to reach a set of political and security benchmarks.

Though Reid ridiculed the bill last week as "weak," he said it would mark an important step toward ending the war.

"If that's all there is, it's a lot more than the president ever expected he'd have to agree to," Reid said.

This story has been viewed 3203 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top