US Democrats on Tuesday shelved their crusade to condition Iraq war funding on troop withdrawals, but denied handing US President George W. Bush a multibillion dollar victory.
Instead of homecoming soldiers, party leaders reluctantly accepted the first congressionally approved political and security benchmarks for the Iraqi government, a plan ridiculed just last week by a top Democrat as "weak."
They vowed to renew their battle to end US involvement in the war through defense bills looming in the next few months and claimed their weeks-long constitutional showdown had boxed Bush in as never before.
House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi presented the outline of the new funding bill, worth around US$100 billion, to her restive party caucus on Tuesday, billing it as "another stage in the sequencing of ending this war."
Pelosi said September was now the real "moment of truth for this war" as several spending bills come up as well as a report on the progress of Bush's troop surge strategy by top war general, David Petraeus.
Some top Republicans have already said they will either need to see progress by then, or sweeping changes in US strategy in the war, which has killed more than 3,400 US soldiers.
Bush has vowed never to accept timelines for withdrawal, billed by Republicans as "surrender dates" and vetoed a previous US$124 billion spending bill because it included such mechanisms.
Bush was expected yesterday to present newly declassified intelligence charging that al-Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden told the group's late leader in Iraq, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, to plan terror strikes on the US.
The bin Laden-Zarqawi link was made in secret documents that were declassified on Tuesday and shored up Washington's argument that it is fighting in Iraq to prevent the country from becoming a new "sanctuary" for al-Qaeda.
The House was to vote, probably today, on a war funding package and companion legislation containing extra domestic spending and including hurricane relief funding and other spending hikes, included to placate liberal Democrats.
The Senate would then be asked to vote on the package as a whole, said Democratic Representative David Obey, who has been locked in talks with Republicans, top senators and the White House on the funding package.
Democrats, who control both chambers of Congress but lack sufficient votes to override a presidential veto, dismissed the notion that their reluctant dropping of withdrawal timelines handed Bush a hard-won victory.
"I don't think there's any way you could stretch, saying whatever we decide to do in this legislation is a defeat," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said.
"For heaven's sakes, look where we've come. We have come a long, long ways," he said.
Leaders said the budget language would mirror a Republican-backed amendment passed last week and accepted by the White House, which would require Bush to report to Congress on progress in Iraq next month and September.
The bill, framed by Republican Senator John Warner, also raises the prospect of the Iraqi government forfeiting non-military financial aid if it fails to reach a set of political and security benchmarks.
Though Reid ridiculed the bill last week as "weak," he said it would mark an important step toward ending the war.
"If that's all there is, it's a lot more than the president ever expected he'd have to agree to," Reid said.
Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell meanwhile said the chamber appeared ready to pass a bill "without a surrender date."
But there was immediate anger from the anti-war wing of the Democratic Party.
"I cannot support a bill that contains nothing more than toothless benchmarks and that allows the president to continue what may be the greatest foreign policy blunder in our nation's history," Democratic Senator Russ Feingold said.
Democratic leaders upped the ante in talks with the White House last Friday, again insisting on the need for a date for troop withdrawals to begin — though offering Bush the power to waive the requirement.
But all along, they said they would get a bill funding the troops until the end of September to the president's desk before leaving on a week-long recess tomorrow.
There was no immediate reaction from the White House, which earlier cited the need to keep ongoing negotiations under wraps.
At least 15 US servicemen were reported killed this weekend in Iraq, and 76 so far this month, bringing total US losses since the invasion to 3,419, according to an AFP count based on Pentagon figures.
EVOLVING SITUATION: Of the latest cases, 23 percent were found to be asymptomatic, but the coronavirus strain in Da Nang is more contagious, authorities said A COVID-19 outbreak that began in the Vietnamese city of Da Nang more than a week ago has spread to at least four city factories with a combined workforce of about 3,700, state media reported yesterday. Four cases were found at the plants in different industrial parks in the central city that collectively employ 77,000 people, the Lao Dong newspaper said. Vietnam, praised widely for its decisive measures to combat the novel coronavirus since it first appeared in late January, is battling new clusters of infection having gone for more than three months without detecting any domestic transmissions. Authorities yesterday reported one new
WARNINGS OVER COMPLACENCY: The curves of new infections in numerous countries is climbing, while others see the the first new infections in months Spikes in COVID-19 infections in Asia have dispelled any notion that the region might be over the worst, with Australia and India yesterday reporting record daily infections, Vietnam fretting over a new surge and North Korea urging vigilance. Asian nations had largely prided themselves on rapidly containing initial outbreaks after the coronavirus emerged in central China late last year, but flare-ups this month have shown the danger of complacency. “We’ve got to be careful not to slip into some idea that there’s some golden immunity that Australia has in relation to this virus,” Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison told reporters. Australia recorded its
‘COVIDIOTS’: Politicians condemned the protest that came amid surging infections in the country, while a marcher said government-induced fear weakened the body Loudly chanting their opposition to masks and vaccines, thousands of people on Saturday gathered in Berlin to protest against COVID-19 restrictions before being dispersed by police. Police put turnout at about 20,000 — well below the 500,000 organizers had announced as they urged a “day of freedom” from months of virus curbs. Despite Germany’s comparatively low toll, authorities are concerned at a rise in infections over the past few weeks and politicians took to social media to criticize the rally as irresponsible. “We are the second wave,” shouted the crowd, a mixture of hard left and right and conspiracy theorists, as they converged
The Australian government yesterday said that it plans to give Google and Facebook three months to negotiate with media businesses fair pay for news content. In releasing a draft of a mandatory code of conduct, Canberra aims to succeed where other nations have failed in making tech firms pay for news siphoned from commercial media companies. Australian Treasurer Josh Frydenberg said that Google and Facebook would be the first platforms targeted by the proposed legislation, but others could follow. “It’s about a fair go for Australian news media businesses, it’s about ensuring that we have increased competition, increased consumer protection and a sustainable