Thu, Jun 23, 2005 News Editorials 586623170 visits
 Photo News
 More World News
 More IELTS
 Johnny Neihu
 
 Community Compass
 
  • Back Issue

  •   << >>   Full List

  • TaipeiTimes
  •   Subscribe
  •   Advertise
  •   Employment
  •   FAQ
  •   About Us
  •   Contact Us
  •   Copyright
  • Search Most Read Story Most Viewed Photo
     Print
     Mail
     wiki links

    North Korea says US must be friendly

    EXPLANATION: If only the US stopped trying to isolate the country and gave it security guarantees it wouldn't have to go ahead with its nuclear weapons program

    AGENCIES, Seoul and Washington
    Thursday, Jun 23, 2005, Page 5

    A members of Korean War Abductees Family Union, the supporting group for those abducted by North Korea at the 1950-53 Korean War, shouts slogans outside a venue of a meeting between representatives of the two Koreas in Seoul,yesterday.
    PHOTO: AP
    North Korea said it wouldn't need any nuclear weapons if the US treated it like a friend as the isolated nation joined South Korea yesterday for high-level reconciliation talks shadowed by the international standoff over the North's nuclear ambitions.

    "If the United States treats the North in a friendly manner, we will possess not one nuclear weapon," the North Korean delegation said, according to Kim Chun-shick, spokesman for the South's side.

    The statement echoed a pledge by North Korean leader Kim Jong-il who met Friday with visiting South Korean Unification Minister Chung Dong-young and said Pyongyang could return to international nuclear disarmament talks as soon as next month if it gets appropriate respect from Washington.

    Chung, head of Seoul's delegation, yesterday urged the North to return to the nuclear talks in July, his ministry said in a summary of his remarks.

    "The North Korean nuclear issue is a matter between the two Koreas as well as an international one," Kim Chun-shick quoted Chung as saying.

    The North has stayed away from six-party talks aimed at persuading it to disarm since June 2004, citing "hostile" US policies, and declared in February that it had nuclear weapons. It has insisted that the nuclear standoff can only be discussed with the United States, and no breakthroughs on the issue were expected at this week's inter-Korean talks.

    The two Koreas were instead focusing on aid and cooperative projects to bridge their divided peninsula, including cross-border trade and family reunions among Koreans separated since the end of the 1950-53 Korean War.

    At the start of Wednesday's talks, the North requested food aid citing continuing shortages, Kim Chun-shick said. He declined to specify the amount but said it was on par with donations made in previous years.

    On Saturday, the North requested 150,000 tons in fertilizer aid from the South, on top of 200,000 tons that it has already received this year. Seoul earlier this year declined to respond to a record request for 500,000 tons, citing previously stalled contacts with the North.

    In related news, Kim Jong-il attempted to engage President George W. Bush directly on the nuclear weapons issue three years ago but the administration spurned the overture, two American experts on Asia said on Wednesday.

    Writing in the Washington Post, former US ambassador to South Korea Donald Gregg and former journalist Don Oberdorfer expressed concern that Kim's November 2002 initiative was never pursued and urged Bush to respond positively to his current overture, made last week.

    When Bush took office in 2001, US officials estimated Pyongyang had fuel for one or two nuclear weapons. Now, that estimate is up to at least half a dozen and, the authors said, "many believe their claim to have fabricated the weapons themselves."

    Gregg and Oberdorfer said they visited Pyongyang in November 2002, after then-US Assistant Secretary of State James Kelly was there and accused the North of pursuing a secret program of enriching uranium for nuclear weapons.

    Gregg and Oberdorfer said while in Pyongyang "we were given a written personal message from Kim to Bush."

    Kim stated if the US recognized the North's sovereignty and provided non-aggression assurances "it is our view that we should be able to find a way to resolve the nuclear issue in compliance with the demands of a new century."

    Also in the message, Kim further promised "if the United States makes a bold decision, we will respond accordingly," the authors wrote in an opinion piece.

    They said they took the message to senior White House and State Department officials and urged them to follow up on Kim's initiative.

    But the administration, then planning for the Iraq invasion, "spurned engagement with North Korea," said Gregg and Oberdorfer.
    This story has been viewed 2163 times.

  • Advertising