Print

Mail

wiki links

S Korea to establish new capital

The South Korean government confirmed on Wednesday that it is to create a new capital in what will be one of Asia's biggest-ever construction projects.

Under the US$48 billion scheme, a site in the sleepy region of Gongju-Yongi 160km south of Seoul will replace it as the seat of parliament and government by 2020.

Despite sharp divisions among the public and the mixed results of similarly ambitious projects by other states, President Roh Moo-hyun insists relocation is necessary to ease chronic overcrowding in Seoul, redistribute the state's wealth and lessen the danger of a bombardment by North Korea.

Gongju-Yongi is a hilly, rural area in South Korea's midlands. Its selection was finalized on Wednesday -- although an appeal has been made to the constitutional court -- and caused joy among local farmers expecting a property boom.

Under the plan announced by Prime Minister Lee Hae-chan, the government will start buying 7,100 hectares next year. After construction starts in 2007, the administration hopes to begin moving 230,000 employees into 85 ministries and institutions within five years.

With the addition of the constitutional court, a national assembly and the presidential palace, it is expected that this region of 140,000 people will become home to half a million. To fund the move, the government will sell off most of the state's property in Seoul, including the presidential Blue House.

The idea is to create a center of government similar to Washington, while leaving Seoul as a business, financial and cultural capital equivalent to New York. Previous development plans for what is Asia's third-biggest economy have concentrated so much money and power in Seoul that the city and its environs are home to almost half of South Korea's 48 million people.

Roh made relocation a pillar of his election campaign, and says it is vital to improve conditions in Seoul by reducing its population by one-tenth.

A move 160km south also takes the government out of the range of much of North Korea's weaponry.

Opponents in the Grand National party argue that the scheme is vote-buying and will cost two or three times the estimate. Many newspapers have called for further investigation, and civic groups have challenged the plan's validity; the constitutional court must rule within six months if it is to go ahead.

Surveys indicate that the public is evenly split. Most feel the question should be put to a referendum, something the Roh has refused to accept. The fiercest criticism has been in Seoul, where Mayor Lee Myung-bak has warned that relocation would undermine the competitiveness of South Korea as a business hub.

In a battle of wills, the city authorities pulled down subway advertisements by the central government which claimed that Seoul had the worst standard of living among the world's 20 biggest cities.

A second discarded poster featured a cartoon of a cramped Seoul businessman watching enviously as a Chinese rival pedals across the expanse of Beijing's Tiananmen Square on his bicycle. The caption read: "Ten reasons why foreign companies choose Beijing rather than Seoul."

It is far from certain, however, that foreign businesses or countries favor relocation. Newspapers reported several negative comments by diplomats concerned at the cost of moving. The US embassy, now in the process of moving within Seoul, said it had no plan to shift again in the foreseeable future.

Such hesitation is inevitable, given the history of Korea's itinerant capital. Yongi county was a center of government once before -- during the Paekyae dynasty 1,500 years ago. Its second opportunity may not last long. If the peninsula reunifies, there are likely to be calls for the capital to be moved north again, possibly even back to Pyongyang -- another ancient seat of government.
This story has been viewed 2357 times.