Maybe she staged her own death and is living it up in a secret tropical hideaway. Maybe Henri Paul, the chauffeur on the fateful night, was an agent for MI6, Britain's equivalent of the CIA, hired by the royal family to kill her (and himself -- oops!) as their Mercedes sped through a Parisian underpass.
Or, as the exasperated columnist Simon Hoggart of The Guardian wrote on Thursday, maybe Diana, Princess of Wales, died on Aug. 31, 1997, because "Prince Charles, together with various gay courtiers, shot at the car from a stealth helicopter just as it entered the tunnel."
You could speculate endlessly about Diana's death -- and 27 percent of the British public, by one poll, believes that it was murder -- but until last week you would have been hard-pressed to find a responsible public figure willing to entertain any of the conspiracy theories.
That all changed Tuesday. In an odd turn of events, Michael Burgess, the man presiding over the British inquests into the deaths of Diana and the boyfriend who died with her, Emad Mohamed al-Fayed, mysteriously refused to dismiss the murder hypotheses.
"I am aware that there is speculation that these deaths were not the result of a sad, but relatively straightforward, road traffic accident in Paris," Burgess said, before directing the Metropolitan Police to look into the matter and report back.
Burgess was hardly announcing a Warren Commission for modern times, but his astonishing request heartened proponents of the murder theory, as well as throwing a small crumb of legitimacy, perhaps, to those who believe that the 1969 lunar landing took place on a Hollywood back lot and that Elvis lives (with Diana, maybe!) in a Florida trailer park.
As far as Diana goes, most nonaccident theories have been discredited. In 1999, the French authorities concluded that the accident took place because Paul, the driver, was drunk and speeding out of control. On Thursday, Jean-Claude Mules, a senior police officer in that investigation, told The Daily Telegraph that the continued rumors of murder and cover-up were "absurd" and that his team had already looked into the various "hypotheses, theories and allegations" swirling around the accident.
Yet the rumors persist, like niggling gnats. Some people might find them good conversation pieces, as ice-breaking as the English weather; others might be X-Files-style enthusiasts, seeing second gunmen lurking behind every shrub and plots behind every unexplained detail; and others, said Cary Cooper, a professor of psychology and health at Lancaster University, simply take emotional comfort from them.
"People need explanations," Cooper said in an interview. "Diana was attractive, young and a celebrity, and quite a lot of people can't understand it when a young person dies. They have to find some kind of theory, some kind of explanation behind it."
Cooper said that some people find that believing in all-powerful government agencies, even secret and ruthless ones, is more palatable than accepting that death is unpredictable.
"If things can just happen to you randomly, it means you are vulnerable," he said. "We'd rather think there was something behind it, because then we could, maybe, control it. If we can find someone who killed Kennedy, maybe we can find a way so that it doesn't happen again, not just to other Kennedys, but to other people."
Meanwhile, Fayed's father, Mohamed al-Fayed, who owns Harrods department store and has said he is "99 percent certain" that the crash was not an accident, has been fanning the flames of the theories with a variety of lawsuits seeking, for instance, to force various governments to release their files on the crash.
Outside Kensington Palace on Thursday, Mark Jamieson, a 46-year-old handyman from Australia visiting London with his two daughters, said the conspiracy theories sounded as good as any explanation to him.
"It was probably a tragic accident," Jamieson said.
Then he thought for a moment. "But if there was a conspiracy, I wouldn't be surprised. Maybe Charles hinted to somebody that she'd be better off dead, and someone took it literally.
"In fact, I'd like to think that Charles did it, because I don't like him at all," Jamieson said.
Australians were downloading virtual private networks (VPNs) in droves, while one of the world’s largest porn distributors said it was blocking users from its platforms as the country yesterday rolled out sweeping online age restriction. Australia in December became the first country to impose a nationwide ban on teenagers using social media. A separate law now requires artificial intelligence (AI)-powered chatbot services to keep certain content — including pornography, extreme violence and self-harm and eating disorder material — from minors or face fines of up to A$49.5 million (US$34.6 million). The country also joined Britain, France and dozens of US states requiring
Hungarian authorities temporarily detained seven Ukrainian citizens and seized two armored cars carrying tens of millions of euros in cash across Hungary on suspicion of money laundering, officials said on Friday. The Ukrainians were released on Friday, following their detention on Thursday, but Hungarian officials held onto the cash, prompting Ukraine to accuse Hungary’s Russia-friendly government of illegally seizing the money. “We will not tolerate this state banditism,” Ukrainian Minister of Foreign Affairs Andrii Sybiha said. The seven detained Ukrainians were employees of the Ukrainian state-owned Oschadbank, who were traveling in the two armored cars that were carrying the money between Austria and
Kosovar President Vjosa Osmani on Friday after dissolving the Kosovar parliament said a snap election should be held as soon as possible to avoid another prolonged political crisis in the Balkan country at a time of global turmoil. Osmani said it is important for Kosovo to wrap up the upcoming election process and form functional institutions for political stability as the war rages in the Middle East. “Precisely because the geopolitical situation is that complex, it is important to finish this electoral process which is coming up,” she said. “It is very hard now to imagine what will happen next.” Kosovo, which declared
MORE BANS: Australia last year required sites to remove accounts held by under-16s, with a few countries pushing for similar action at an EU level and India considering its own ban Indonesia on Friday said it would ban social media access for children under 16, citing threats from online pornography, cyberbullying, online fraud and Internet addiction. “Accounts belonging to children under 16 on high-risk platforms will start to be deactivated, beginning with YouTube, TikTok, Facebook, Instagram, Threads, X, Bigo Live and Roblox,” Indonesian Minister of Communications and Digital Meutya Hafid said. “The government is stepping in so that parents no longer have to fight alone against the giants of the algorithm. Implementation will begin on March 28, 2026,” she said. The social media ban would be introduced in stages “until all platforms fulfill their
RSS