This week in London, British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw has been forced to acknowledge publicly that a paper published by the British government to make the case against Saddam Hussein was "an embarrassment."
The man who oversaw compilation of the report, Alastair Campbell, who is British Prime Minister Tony Blair's communications chief, spent Wednesday parrying with an angry committee chairman in Parliament who charged he had "embellished the evidence to the point of misleading Parliament and the public at a vital time relating to peace and war."
Blair himself told parliament that while the government had made some errors in presenting its case, the removal of Saddam Hussein was "right for Iraq, right for the region and right for the wider world."
In contrast, US President George W. Bush has largely brushed off questions about the intelligence as the work of "revisionist historians." His Republican allies, unlike Blair's divided Labour Party, have kept congressional hearings behind closed doors.
Bush's protective press aides have been successful at shielding him from many questions on the subject, but even when reporters had brief access to the president -- on Tuesday at Camp David, on Wednesday at the White House -- they asked about other subjects. "That would be unimaginable in London, at least in this environment," a British diplomat said here on Wednesday.
Bush's political aides say that while the issue of potentially tailored intelligence has not gone away, they are more worried about the possible political impact of continuing casualties in occupied Iraq.
Within Bush's foreign-policy team, officials say they are more worried about Blair than about their own boss. The British prime minister, they say, may be so wounded by investigations in London that he will have to keep some distance from Bush when the White House needs him as a bridge to Europe, particularly on issues like Iran and Syria.
Yesterday, Condoleezza Rice, the president's national security adviser, is expected to describe Bush's vision of the US-British agenda in the aftermath of Iraq -- at a speech in London.
Whether Rice and others will ever face the kind of questioning that has emerged in London is unclear. Democrats on this side of the Atlantic are now making more pointed charges and raising more specific questions.
Democratic senator John Kerry, who voted in favor of the resolution authorizing Bush to go to war if necessary, declared last week that the president "misled every one of us," though he later said he was referring to two specific pieces of intelligence.
On Wednesday morning, Howard Dean, another aspirant for the Democratic presidential nomination, who opposed the war, told a foreign policy forum here that the question was coming down to "what did the president know and when did he know it?"
But on Capitol Hill, such charges do not appear to be resonating very loudly.
Many Democrats say they are concerned about making public charges, at least until it is clear that investigators in Iraq are unlikely to find large caches of unconventional weapons.
Republicans say that they will take a go-slow approach, reading intelligence reports over the summer, questioning analysts about whether they were pressured into certain assessments of Iraq's abilities, and only then contemplating public hearings.
"This isn't sticking," one of Bush's top political strategists insisted the other day, "because people understand that the world is better off without Saddam Hussein."
On Saturday, Blair told a noisy session of Parliament there was not a single instance in which his government made any claims that were wrong -- including the one in a September "White Paper" that charged that Saddam's chemical and biological weapons "are deployable within 45 minutes of an order to use them."
Today that claim looks particularly open to question because US and British forces have not yet found evidence of weapons that were ready to launch.
Blair has most recently presented a humanitarian argument for Saddam's removal, emphasizing that he was a murderous dictator -- a theme Bush has also stressed, to applause, in recent fund-raising appearances.
In part the difference reactions may lie in the different ways the American and British publics regarded the Iraqi threat in the first place.
"The basic rationale of Iraq was that we wanted to prevent a second 9-11, this time with nuclear weapons, maybe provided by Saddam Hussein," said Samuel Berger, former president Bill Clinton's national security adviser, whom the Democrats have turned to for advice on how to handle the delicate issue of confronting Bush on the rationale for the war without seeming to denigrate its outcome. "That resonated here," he said, but in Europe "the threat pointed to the need for more and more inspections."
So while Republicans stay in firm command of the investigation here, in London two parliamentary panels are now looking into the allegations, and one of them, the House select committee on foreign affairs, has taken testimony from Straw and the two ministers who resigned from Blair's Cabinet over the war, Robin Cook and Clare Short.
Short said that Blair had "duped" the country, while Cook said, "Instead of using intelligence as evidence on which to base a decision about policy, we used intelligence as the basis on which to justify a policy on which we had already settled."
At issue are the September report and a second dossier promoted by the government to swing public opinion behind Blair's conviction that Saddam and his unconventional arms represented a serious and immediate threat.
At the time London was viewed as a more credible source of information than Washington, but critics are now charging that Britain overplayed its role and manipulated information.
The second report, produced by Downing Street officials, has come to be known as the "dodgy dossier" because it turned out to be a mixture of real intelligence and parts of articles from scholarly and military journals.
Campbell conceded that there had been a "mistake" in its preparation, and that parts of an article written by Ibrahim al-Marashi for the Middle East Review of International Affairs had been included without attribution in the February dossier.
He told the committee that he had apologized to intelligence chiefs for the gaffe, but he maintained it had been an accident and that procedures for making such information public had since been tightened.
‘IN A DIFFERENT PLACE’: The envoy first visited Shanghai, where he attended a Chinese basketball playoff match, and is to meet top officials in Beijing tomorrow US Secretary of State Antony Blinken yesterday arrived in China on his second visit in a year as the US ramps up pressure on its rival over its support for Russia while also seeking to manage tensions with Beijing. The US diplomat tomorrow is to meet China’s top brass in Beijing, where he is also expected to plead for restraint as Taiwan inaugurates president-elect William Lai (賴清德), and to raise US concerns on Chinese trade practices. However, Blinken is also seeking to stabilize ties, with tensions between the world’s two largest economies easing since his previous visit in June last year. At the
Nearly half of China’s major cities are suffering “moderate to severe” levels of subsidence, putting millions of people at risk of flooding, especially as sea levels rise, according to a study of nationwide satellite data released yesterday. The authors of the paper, published by the journal Science, found that 45 percent of China’s urban land was sinking faster than 3mm per year, with 16 percent at more than 10mm per year, driven not only by declining water tables, but also the sheer weight of the built environment. With China’s urban population already in excess of 900 million people, “even a small portion
UNSETTLING IMAGES: The scene took place in front of TV crews covering the Trump trial, with a CNN anchor calling it an ‘emotional and unbelievably disturbing moment’ A man who doused himself in an accelerant and set himself on fire outside the courthouse where former US president Donald Trump is on trial has died, police said yesterday. The New York City Police Department (NYPD) said the man was declared dead by staff at an area hospital. The man was in Collect Pond Park at about 1:30pm on Friday when he took out pamphlets espousing conspiracy theories, tossed them around, then doused himself in an accelerant and set himself on fire, officials and witnesses said. A large number of police officers were nearby when it happened. Some officers and bystanders rushed
Beijing is continuing to commit genocide and crimes against humanity against Uyghurs and other Muslim minorities in its western Xinjiang province, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said in a report published on Monday, ahead of his planned visit to China this week. The State Department’s annual human rights report, which documents abuses recorded all over the world during the previous calendar year, repeated language from previous years on the treatment of Muslims in Xinjiang, but the publication raises the issue ahead of delicate talks, including on the war in Ukraine and global trade, between the top U.S. diplomat and Chinese