History professor Wu Kun-tsai (吳昆財) on Monday said that he would initiate a referendum in 2020 to reintroduce Chinese history content that was removed from new high-school curriculum guidelines, the Chinese-language China Times reported yesterday.
Work to prepare the referendum proposal has already begun and the tentative referendum question is: “Do you agree the history curriculum for high schools should be changed back to how it was traditionally?” the newspaper quoted Wu as saying.
He plans to begin collecting signatures for the referendum in April, when he would have obtained more resources and support, and to hold the referendum in 2020 alongside the presidential and legislative elections, it said.
Photo: Peter Lo, Taipei Times
Wu is a leading figure in a campaign to “save Chinese history” launched last month by a group of history teachers.
The group has opposed a new history curriculum the Ministry of Education approved in August that adopted a theme-based approach and made Chinese history part of a theme called “China and East Asia,” with the other two themes being “Taiwan and the World” and world history.
The new curriculum, which is to be implemented in the next academic year, has been described by the group as an attempt to “desinicize” Taiwan. It is in stark contrast to the current, or traditional, version, which requires students to learn Chinese history in a strict chronological order from prehistory.
The ministry has defended the new curriculum, saying that it would enable students to “not only learn about Chinese history, but develop a structured and rich understanding of its connections to global history.”
Many opponents of the new curriculum had as early as August suggested launching a referendum on the issue, but the plan was postponed as it needed more time and resources, Wu was quoted as saying.
By holding the referendum alongside the presidential election, he hopes to urge presidential candidates to clarify their stance on “whether future generations should study Chinese history,” a question he said is closely related to national status and cross-strait policies.
He understands that referendums are expensive and energy-consuming, but they are “the last resort to protect popular sovereignty,” Wu was quoted as saying.
“The nation should be run by experts. That the public has to hold a referendum to decide policy directions shows that the government is failing. If everything has to be solved by referendum, what do we want a government for?” he was quoted as saying.
An increase in Taiwanese boats using China-made automatic identification systems (AIS) could confuse coast guards patrolling waters off Taiwan’s southwest coast and become a loophole in the national security system, sources familiar with the matter said yesterday. Taiwan ADIZ, a Facebook page created by enthusiasts who monitor Chinese military activities in airspace and waters off Taiwan’s southwest coast, on Saturday identified what seemed to be a Chinese cargo container ship near Penghu County. The Coast Guard Administration went to the location after receiving the tip and found that it was a Taiwanese yacht, which had a Chinese AIS installed. Similar instances had also
GOOD DIPLOMACY: The KMT has maintained close contact with representative offices in Taiwan and had extended an invitation to Russia as well, the KMT said The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) would “appropriately handle” the fallout from an invitation it had extended to Russia’s representative to Taipei to attend its international banquet last month, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) said yesterday. US and EU representatives in Taiwan boycotted the event, and only later agreed to attend after the KMT rescinded its invitation to the Russian representative. The KMT has maintained long-term close contact with all representative offices and embassies in Taiwan, and had extended the invitation as a practice of good diplomacy, Chu said. “Some EU countries have expressed their opinions of Russia, and the KMT respects that,” he
AMENDMENT: Contact with certain individuals in China, Hong Kong and Macau must be reported, and failure to comply could result in a prison sentence, the proposal stated The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) yesterday voted against a proposed bill by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers that would require elected officials to seek approval before visiting China. DPP Legislator Puma Shen’s (沈伯洋) proposed amendments to the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例), stipulate that contact with certain individuals in China, Hong Kong and Macau should be reported, while failure to comply would be punishable by prison sentences of up to three years, alongside a fine of NT$10 million (US$309,041). Fifty-six voted with the TPP in opposition
VIGILANCE: The military is paying close attention to actions that might damage peace and stability in the region, the deputy minister of national defense said The People’s Republic of China (PRC) might consider initiating a hack on Taiwanese networks on May 20, the day of the inauguration ceremony of president-elect William Lai (賴清德), sources familiar with cross-strait issues said. While US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken’s statement of the US expectation “that all sides will conduct themselves with restraint and prudence in the period ahead” would prevent military actions by China, Beijing could still try to sabotage Taiwan’s inauguration ceremony, the source said. China might gain access to the video screens outside of the Presidential Office Building and display embarrassing messages from Beijing, such as congratulating Lai