Judicial Yuan officials yesterday defended a proposal to streamline the upper echelon of the judiciary, by drastically reducing the number of Supreme Court judges, while giving the president the power to appoint judges without legislative approval.
The proposed regulations would create a more equitable judicial system and help avert political interference, the officials said.
The proposal to reduce the number of judges at the highest level was presented at Monday’s meeting of a preparatory committee for the National Congress on Judicial Reform, with committee members saying that the president should have the power to appoint judges to the Supreme Court and the Supreme Administrative Court.
Photo: Peter Lo, Taipei Times
The main focus of the plan is to make the system more of a pyramid structure, cutting the numbers of Supreme Court and Supreme Administrative Court judges from a combined total of 94 to 14 and seven respectively within five years.
Under the proposal, the Judicial Yuan president would nominate 63 candidates — three times the required number of judges — before a screening committee trimmed the list to 42. The president would select candidates from the shortlist.
Judicial Yuan Secretary-General Lu Tai-lang (呂太郎) told a news conference in Taipei yesterday that although there is a perceived shift toward a situation where political appointments of Supreme Court judges could be made — a cause for concern among some people — the proposal would actually safeguard the system from political interference.
Taiwan has a similar justice system to Austria, Germany, Spain and South Korea, whose leaders appoint Supreme Court judges, with or without the approval of parliament.
“We are conforming to a worldwide trend,” Lu said.
At present, the Judicial Yuan nominates and appoints top-level judges, which has led to criticism and calls for change.
Some legal experts and judicial reform advocates say that the Judicial Yuan is not aligned with societal progress and the democratization of the past two decades, having a mindset and attitude still heavily influenced by the training they received during the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) one-party authoritarian rule.
The proposal has caused heated debate among lawmakers.
KMT caucus convener Sufin Siluko (廖國棟) said that President Tsai Ing-wei (蔡英文) is using illegal means to expand her powers, with the aim of influencing the judicial system.
“Tsai’s regime is heading toward a dictatorship. Her gradual moves to broaden her powers are the same as those conducted by Adolf Hitler,” Sufin said.
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Tsai Yi-yu (蔡易餘) defended the plan.
As the president would only choose from a shortlist of nominees, there would be relatively little outside influence in the process, Tsai Yi-yu said.
Grand Justice Lin Tzu-yi (林子儀), who convened Monday’s judicial reform meeting, said it is a misunderstanding to describe the proposed nomination procedure as allowing “political appointments.”
“The screening committee would be composed of legal experts, legislators and professionals from various sectors, so it would be a democratic process that ensures the courts represent the diverse voices of society,” Lin said.
FAST TRACK? Chinese spouses must renounce their Chinese citizenship and pledge allegiance to Taiwan to gain citizenship, some demonstrators said Opponents and supporters of a bill that would allow Chinese spouses to obtain Taiwanese citizenship in four years instead of six staged protests near the Legislative Yuan in Taipei yesterday morning. Those who oppose the bill proposed by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) demanded that Chinese spouses be granted citizenship only after renouncing their Chinese citizenship, passing a citizenship test and pledging allegiance to Taiwan. The demonstrators, who were protesting at a side entrance to the Legislative Yuan on Jinan Road, were mostly members of the Taiwan Association of University Professors and other organizations advocating Taiwanese independence. Supporters of the bill, led
SILENT MAJORITY: Only 1 percent of Chinese rejected all options but war to annex Taiwan, while one-third viewed war as unacceptable, a university study showed Many Chinese are more concerned with developments inside their country than with seeking unification with Taiwan, al-Jazeera reported on Friday. Although China claims Taiwan as its own territory and has vowed to annex it, by force if necessary, 23-year-old Chinese Shao Hongtian was quoted by al-Jazeera as saying that “hostilities are not the way to bring China and Taiwan together.” “I want unification to happen peacefully,” Shao said. Al-Jazeera said it changed Shao’s name to respect his wish for anonymity. If peaceful unification is not possible, Shao said he would prefer “things to remain as they are,” adding that many of his friends feel
Taiwan has “absolute air superiority” over China in its own airspace, Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) told a meeting of the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee on Monday, amid concern over whether Taipei could defend itself against a military incursion by Beijing. Po made the remarks in response to a question from Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Chiu Chih-wei (邱志偉) on whether Taiwan would have partial or complete air superiority if Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) warplanes were to enter Taiwan’s airspace. Po, a retired pilot, said that the Taiwanese military has “absolute air superiority” over PLA
A shipment of basil pesto imported by Costco Wholesale Taiwan from the US in the middle of last month was intercepted at the border after testing positive for excessive pesticide residue, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said yesterday. Samples taken from a shipment of the Kirkland Signature brand of basil pesto imported by Costco contained 0.1 milligrams per kilogram of ethylene oxide, exceeding the non-detectable limit. Ethylene oxide is a carcinogenic substance that can be used as a pesticide. The 674kg shipment of basil pesto would either be destroyed or returned to its country of origin, as is the procedure for all