Academics at a forum held by a pro-independence organization yesterday lauded President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) refusal to recognize the so-called “1992 consensus,” but took issue with the president’s seeming inability to break the shackles of the Republic of China’s (ROC) constitutional system.
The World United Formosans for Independence invited a dozen of academics to examine Tsai’s policies in the first three months of her presidency and share their thoughts on her government’s performance in terms of national status, transitional justice, cross-strait ties and other areas.
Tsai’s refusal to recognize the “1992 consensus” constitutes a major breakthrough, as it consolidated the foundation for Taiwanese independence, World United Formosans for Independence chairman Chen Nan-tien (陳南天) said.
The “1992 consensus” refers to a supposed understanding between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese government that both sides of the Taiwan Strait acknowledge there is “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means.
“However, the new government has yet to make any progress in breaking the ROC’s constitutional system,” Chen said. “It has not raised any objection to the use of ‘Chinese Taipei’ as the title under which Taiwan participated in this year’s World Health Assembly and the Rio de Janeiro Olympics.”
Legislative Speaker Su Jia-chyuan (蘇嘉全) told reporters on the sidelines of his meeting with Washington-based National Endowment for Democracy president Carl Gershman on Thursday that it requires a national consensus to decide under which appellation the country should join international organizations, Chen said.
“Does the national consensus support the title ‘Chinese Taipei?’” Chen asked.
Despite mounting pressure from China, Tsai has only recognized that a cross-strait meeting took place in 1992, rather than a so-called “1992 consensus,” prompting Beijing to suspend cross-strait communication mechanisms.
Taiwan National Security Institute president Lo Fu-chen (羅福全) also praised Tsai’s reluctance to accept the “1992 consensus” as her greatest achievement yet.
However, Lo criticized Tsai’s ambiguous stance on the South China Sea dispute and the WHO’s citation of the “one China” principle in its invitation to Taiwan for this year’s World Health Assembly, saying they have undermined the nation’s dignity and sent a confusing message to the international community.
He said the problem might be attributed to having a relatively weak governing team, because it is still the early stage of Tsai’s presidency, “forcing her to place KMT-affiliated experts in important posts such as foreign affairs and national defense. The views of such officials may collide with those of the Tsai administration.”
Economic Democracy Union convener Lai Chung-chiang (賴中強) urged the Tsai administration to prepare itself for two potential threats from China.
“The first one is likely to occur in 2018, when Taiwan’s Straits Exchange Foundation and China’s Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits are expected to resume communications,” Lai said, adding that Beijing is expected to use a proposed cross-strait trade in goods agreement as a leverage to pressure Tsai into accepting the “1992 consensus.”
Lai said the second threat is expected to happen in 2021, the centennial anniversary of the Chinese Communist Party’s founding, when he believes Beijing will push for political negotiations with Taipei and the signing of a peace accord.
The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) yesterday reported the first case of a new COVID-19 subvariant — BA.3.2 — in a 10-year-old Singaporean girl who had a fever upon arrival in Taiwan and tested positive for the disease. The girl left Taiwan on March 20 and the case did not have a direct impact on the local community, it said. The WHO added the BA.3.2 strain to its list of Variants Under Monitoring in December last year, but this was the first imported case of the COVID-19 variant in Taiwan, CDC Deputy Director-General Lin Ming-cheng (林明誠) said. The girl arrived in Taiwan on
South Korea is planning to revise its controversial electronic arrival card, a step Taiwanese officials said prompted them to hold off on planned retaliatory measures, a South Korean media report said yesterday. A Yonhap News Agency report said that the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs is planning to remove the “previous departure place” and “next destination” fields from its e-arrival card system. The plan, reached after interagency consultations, is under review and aims to simplify entry procedures and align the electronic form with the paper version, a South Korean ministry official said. The fields — which appeared only on the electronic form
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) is suspending retaliation measures against South Korea that were set to take effect tomorrow, after Seoul said it is updating its e-arrival system, MOFA said today. The measures were to be a new round of retaliation after Taiwan on March 1 changed South Korea's designation on government-issued alien resident certificates held by South Korean nationals to "South Korea” from the "Republic of Korea," the country’s official name. The move came after months of protests to Seoul over its listing of Taiwan as "China (Taiwan)" in dropdown menus on its new online immigration entry system. MOFA last week
A bipartisan group of US senators has introduced a bill to enhance cooperation with Taiwan on drone development and to reduce reliance on supply chains linked to China. The proposed Blue Skies for Taiwan Act of 2026 was introduced by Republican US senators Ted Cruz and John Curtis, and Democratic US senators Jeff Merkley and Andy Kim. The legislation seeks to ease constraints on Taiwan-US cooperation in uncrewed aerial systems (UAS), including dependence on China-sourced components, limited access to capital and regulatory barriers under US export controls, a news release issued by Cruz on Wednesday said. The bill would establish a "Blue UAS
RSS