Wed, Apr 20, 2016 page3

• Groups lambast plan to ease hunting restrictions

  WILDLIFE: Broadening the scope of hunting to include ‘self-use’ or ‘non-profit’ activities could open it to misuse and lead to commercial hunting, conservationists said

  • By Chen Wei-han / Staff reporter
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  A coalition of conservation groups yesterday condemned draft amendments to the Wildlife Conservation Act (野生動物保育法) that would allow Aborigines to hunt protected animals for self-use or non-profit purposes, which the groups said could be used as an excuse for commercial hunting.

  The existing law allows Aborigines to hunt wildlife for cultural or ritual purposes on a case-by-case basis; the amendments, which the legislature’s Economics Committee proposed on Friday last week, would broaden the scope to legalize “self-use” or “non-profit” hunting by applying for a permit beforehand or submitting a report after the hunt.

  Conservationists also criticized proposed amendments that would allow farmers to “deal” with crop-destroying animals and ban snare traps made with powerful springs, but not other types of snares.

  

  Members of conservation groups hold a press conference in Taipei yesterday, condemning draft amendments to the Wildlife Conservation Act that will enable Aborigines to hunt protected animals for self-use or non-profit purposes.

  Photo: Chien Jung-fong, Taipei Times

  “The definition of self-use is too fuzzy and can be used as an excuse for commercial hunting and animal trade. Who is to decide what are crop-destroying animals and how are we to deal with them? Can crop-destroying animals be traded?” Environment and Animal Society of Taiwan chief executive officer Wu Hung (朱增宏) asked.

  “With all due respect to Aborigines and Aboriginal traditions, hunting can damage the fragile wildlife population ... The situation will worsen given a market economy and modern hunting gear,” National Pingtung University of Science and Technology Institute of Wildlife Conservation director Hwang Mei-hsu (黃美秀) said.

  Showing snares made with a wire noose and photographs of Formosan black bears with missing paws, Hwang said modern traps are too destructive and indiscriminate, and not part of Aboriginal traditions.

  Hwang, who is also the honorary president of the Taiwan Black Bear Conservation Association, said eight of 15 Taiwan black bears she studied in 2000 had been injured by snare traps, and yet they continue to face the same threat.

  She called for a complete ban on all kinds of traps and for the government to fund and launch a nationwide wildlife census to understand wildlife population and the effects of hunting.

  “There is no opposition between Aborigines and conservationists. What we all want is a sustainable environment in which humans and animals can live in harmony,” she said.

  Marine conservation group Oceanus Honors Gaia deputy director Lin Yu-kai (林于凱) said that conservationists respect and support Aborigines’ rights to self government and preserving tradition, but that should not compromise wildlife conservation.

  “If hunting can be carried out on a reporting basis without approval in advance, how can hunting activities be monitored?” Lin asked.

  Meanwhile, the committee discontinued the review of a draft bill on animal release practices.

  Chinese Wild Bird Federation deputy director Chen Te-chih (陳德治) said many wildlife transactions were conducted solely to support the religious practice of releasing animals, which has caused mass deaths and could damage the ecology and biodiversity as released animals might be invasive species.

  The groups urged lawmakers to reconsider the draft amendments and not to revise the act until further negotiations.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Taiwan in Time: The breakfast that sparked Taiwan’s semiconductor revolution

  • 2

    Criticism to motivate Yamal: Barca assistant

  • 3

    Xi, Trump differ on outcome of talks

  • 4

    Takaichi vows ‘golden age’ of ties with the US

  • 5

    Trump says he would bring up Taiwan in Xi talk