The Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) defeat in yesterday’s elections showed the complete failure of the policies of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration.
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) won both the presidency and control of the legislature for the first time in Taiwan’s history, scoring a resounding victory over the KMT, which also came in second in party votes.
The major focus of the Ma administration, his cross-strait policies, including the signing of the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) and negotiation of the cross-strait service trade accord and the cross-strait goods trade accord, his “personal historical achievement” in meeting Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and promises made by KMT presidential candidate Eric Chu (朱立倫) to continue Ma’s policies, proved to be the party’s Achilles heel.
Photo: Reuters
Peace across the Taiwan Strait is not the sole concern of the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), but the roots of the doubts gnawing at the public about opening up to China lies in the inherent differences of the two nations’ political systems, quality of life and views on democracy.
When Beijing seeks to cordon off Taiwan with its “one China” principle, it makes Taiwanese feel they have lost all say in the future of their nation.
Despite couching its designs behind the KMT’s so-called “1992 consensus,” China has proven that closer ties with it come only at a severe cost to Taiwan’s sovereignty and dignity.
Photo: Sandy Cheng, AFP
The ECFA has benefitted only certain groups and social classes, leaving Ma without convincing reasons to show a majority of Taiwanese that further tightening of the ties with China would make their lives better. It turns out that increased cross-strait interaction has only shown Taiwan the CCP’s true face.
Continuing to pursue ties with China despite the lack of an internal consensus on how the nation should deal with its larger neighbor has only deepened the public’s mistrust and triggered the Sunflower movement, which began with the occupation of the Legislative Yuan’s main chamber on March 18, 2014.
That protest, coupled with the landside defeat the KMT suffered in the nine-in-one elections on Nov. 29 of that year, were the public’s retaliation against the Ma administration’s brutish dismissal of their concerns and interests.
Yesterday’s results simply served as further confirmation that the Ma administration’s cross-strait policies would be consigned to history’s garbage can.
The priority the administration placed on cross-strait policies led to dysfunctional diplomatic and defense polices as well. The abandonment of “cash diplomacy” tactics and a diplomatic detente are two different things; detente is not surrender.
The direct result of Ma’s detente with Beijing on the diplomatic front led Taiwan to become entirely reliant, even subservient, to China on the international front. This was never a viable path; it is the path of the walking dead.
However, the Ma government’s grand failure was in its handling of the economy and public welfare.
From the moment his administration took office in May 2008, it came in for criticism over its inept response to natural disaster and economic problems — its belated reaction to Typhoon Morakot and resulting incompetence; an inability to meet Ma’s “6-3-3” campaign promise of 6 percent annual economic growth, US$30,000 per capita income and an unemployment rate lower than 3 percent by 2012, even though Ma kept pushing back the goalposts in terms of delivery deadlines.
His dismissal of public concerns about the safety of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant, the hiking of gas and electricity prices, controversial adjustments to the national high-school curriculum only served to fuel public anger, anger that found its voice in the November 2014 polls and again yesterday.
The political strife between Ma and Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) badly split the KMT and cost the president his leverage in the legislature as well as with internal KMT reforms.
His distance from the party and unwillingness to promote KMT members, relying instead on a clique of “trusted advisers and confidants,” led to younger KMT members shying away from his administration and seeking public office.
In short, the KMT’s landslide loss yesterday was deeply rooted in Ma’s actions and the party’s own mistakes.
However, the biggest casualty is Chu, who not only lost the election, but has surrendered the KMT chairmanship.
His credibility with the pan-blue bloc was already circling the drain when he decided to replace Deputy Legislative Speaker Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) in the race. Now his political capability and political authority are being questioned.
Chu’s failure to identify with any of the younger rising political stars in the party may spell a period of internal fragmentation for the KMT in the months, even years, to come.
As in 2000 and 2004, the KMT finds itself at the crossroads. Its post-2000 election decisions clearly contributed to its defeat again in 2004.
If it seeks to further embrace the radical blue path, like the New Party, it will only put the KMT further from mainstream public expectations.
The question facing the party now is who it can find to lead it out of the wilderness.
Translated by staff writer Jake Chung
UNDER WATCH: Taiwan will have to establish a standardized nucleic acid testing method to identify the virus and monitor its spread, the CDC said The Langya henipavirus, which can be transmitted from animals to humans, has been discovered in China, with 35 human infections reported so far, Taiwan’s Centers for Disease Control (CDC) said, adding that the nation would establish a nucleic acid testing method to identify the virus. A study titled “A Zoonotic Henipavirus in Febrile Patients in China” that was published in the New England Journal of Medicine on Thursday said that a new henipavirus associated with a fever-causing human illness was identified in China. The study said an investigation identified 35 patients with acute infection of the Langya henipavirus in China’s Shandong
MISSILE PATHS: Certain information on the Chinese missile fire was not disclosed to maintain secrecy over military intelligence-gathering capabilities, the MND said Military experts yesterday speculated on the implication of the government’s tight-lipped response and the lack of air-raid sirens during the first day of China’s military drills the previous day. On Thursday, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) launched 11 Dongfeng-series ballistic missiles into waters north, east and south of Taiwan, a day after US House of Representative Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s departure from the country, the Ministry of National Defense (MND) said. The Japanese Ministry of Defense said that China fired nine missiles toward Taiwan, including four that flew over Taiwan proper. However, China’s exhibition of force failed to terrorize the local populace, because
If any war were to break out between the US and China, one trigger might be the increasingly frequent fighter jet encounters near Taiwan. Almost every day, Taiwanese fighter pilots hop in their US-made F-16s to intercept Chinese warplanes screaming past their territory. The encounters probe the nation’s defenses and force the pilots on both sides to avoid mistakes that could lead to a crisis that spins out of control. “I didn’t know whether they would fire at me,” said retired colonel Mountain Wang, recounting a tense five-minute confrontation he had with Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) jets more than a decade
INCREASINGLY EMBOLDENED: China can no longer be dismissed as inexperienced, demonstrating an ability to coordinate land and sea missile systems, an expert said Beijing’s largest-ever exercises around Taiwan have offered essential clues into its plans for a grueling blockade in the event of an attack on Taiwan, and revealed an increasingly emboldened Chinese military, experts said. The visit to Taiwan by US House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi — second in line to the presidency — sparked outrage from Beijing, which launched vast military maneuvers around the nation, even at the risk of partially exposing its plans to the US and its Asian allies. Mobilizing fighter planes, helicopters and warships, the drills aim to simulate a blockade of Taiwan and include practicing an “attack on
RSS