Sat, Sep 19, 2015 page3

• Aboriginal groups divided over self-government law

  • By Abraham Gerber / Staff reporter
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  Proposed self-government legislation for Aboriginal groups drew competing protests from Aboriginal activists yesterday.

  Protesters from the Indigenous Youth Front faced off against a smaller group of older Aboriginal representatives led by a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) county councilor outside the Legislative Yuan.

  The demonstrators shouted competing slogans before laying out their contrasting positions on the adequacy of the “Indigenous Self-Rule Temporary Regulations” (原住民族自治暫行條例) under consideration by the legislature.

  

  A police officer separates members of the Indigenous Youth Front, left, and members of other Aboriginal groups, right, as the two groups engage in a war of words over the passage of the “Indigenous Self-Rule Temporary Regulations” outside the Legislative Yuan in Taipei yesterday.

  Photo: Liao Chen-huei, Taipei Times

  Indigenous Youth Front protesters said that the bill would only allow for “bird cage” self-government, which they described as “crippled” and “fake.”

  “This is not self-government — it is the functions of the Council of Indigenous Peoples being outsourced to villages,” Front member Savungaz Valincinan said, criticizing the law’s focus on culture and education, while failing to protect hunting rights and allow Aborigines to draft their own criminal and civil law.

  “What self-rule should look like should be discussed and determined by villages,” she said. “Right now, the executive branch has pegged us into their pre-prepared frame.”

  Valincinan said that the representative electoral system of government prescribed by the act would not square with the customs of all Aborigines, citing the example of the Amis, who she said traditionally divide different tribal responsibilities based on age.

  In contrast to the act’s emphasis on adversarial majority rule, many Aboriginal communities favor a “collegial system” focusing on achieving an absolute consensus on major decisions, she said.

  Front member Juan Chun-ta (阮俊達) said that the funding provided under the act was inadequate.

  The budget for the “self-governments” to be established would be allocated directly by the Executive Yuan for the next 10 years, after which a “Self-Government Fund” worth NT$10 billion (US$306 million) would be established to fund future expenses.

  “That figure is extremely small,” he said. “There is no way you can do much with that amount of revenue.”

  He said that the annual budget of the Council of Indigenous Peoples is more than NT$8 billion, while the yearly budget of Chiayi City is NT$11 billion, even though its population is less than half of the nation’s Aborigines.

  A group of older protesters led by KMT Hsinchu County Councilor Obay a Awi (趙一先) said that the bill would be a beginning that could lay the foundation for more substantial self-government.

  Obay said that the bill was intended to help Aborigines learn the “basic motions” of self-government, rather than establishing the final framework.

  He said that it would provide a source of legal authority for existing Aboriginal assemblies, while allowing their members to focus full time on drafting and discussing permanent self-government proposals.

  He added that while he did not disagree with the competing protesters’ desire for broader self-government than that contained in the draft bill, he felt that their opposition was not “prudent” because there is no guarantee that a more far-reaching bill would pass if the current one were rejected.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Taipei to join Japan, US response to rare earth ban

  • 2

    Torrential rain expected this week, the CWA says

  • 3

    Urban mining could evade China’s grip

  • 4

    Notes from Central Taiwan: Taiwan’s intergenerational conflict

  • 5

    Northern cities to decide school/work cancelations by 8pm