Fri, Jun 12, 2015 - Page 3 News List

Immigrant groups slam amendment proposals

DOUBLE STANDARDS?The civic groups said the proposals continue to violate the rights of immigrants by legislating morals and making it unduly difficult to become Taiwanese

By Alison Hsiao  /  Staff reporter

Civic groups demonstrate outside the Legislative Yuan in Taipei yesterday to protest against the Ministry of the Interior’s proposed amendments to the Nationality Act, which they say would violate the human rights of immigrants.

Photo: Su Fang-ho, Taipei Times

Several civic groups yesterday criticized the Ministry of the Interior’s proposed amendments to the Nationality Act (國籍法), saying they failed to make any progressive changes to the existing law, which they say violates the human rights of immigrants.

The alliance — consisting of the Taiwan International Family Association (TIFA) and the TransAsia Sisters Association, Taiwan (TASAT) and others — called for amendments that would respect the rights of immigrants. The group criticized the amendments proposed by the ministry and urged the legislature to adopt the alliance’s proposed amendments.

One of the requirements a foreign national must meet to become a naturalized Republic of China citizen under the Nationality Act is for them to “behave decently and have no record of crime.”

The ministry has proposed revising “crime” to “criminal record,” a move that the alliance called an exercise in semantics.

“Minor offenses that are not prosecuted, granted a deferred prosecution or have sentences that can be commuted to fines and community service should be excluded from the restrictions,” it said.

The more controversial aspect of the article is that immigrants are required to “behave decently.”

The ministry’s proposed amendments would give it the power to define what acts constitute “indecency.”

Taiwan Association for Human Rights secretary-general Chiu E-ling (邱伊翎) said the legislature should get rid of such ambiguous legal terms.

Chen Yi (陳逸), the director of the Awakening Foundation’s volunteer and empowering programs, said that “decent behavior” is not a legal term and would provide too much discretionary power to the relevant authorities.

“What is more, Taiwanese society has a gender-biased view when it comes to the conditions to be met for achieving so-called ‘decency.’ For example, on sexual behavior and marital and family obligations, women are generally judged with a different standard from that used for men. Upholding this restriction is tantamount to threatening immigrants with punishment for failing to fall in line with sexual fidelity and morality,” Chen added.

The new proposal would not see an amendment to the articles stipulating that naturalization could be “withdrawn” if the person is found “not conforming to the provisions of this Act within five years” and that the restriction that naturalized foreign nationals have no right to hold government offices could be lifted only after 10 years of naturalization.

“Aren’t we citizens after getting the national identification card? However, the fact is that naturalization does not bring us equal rights,” an immigrant said.

The only improvement made by the ministry’s proposal is the change to the regulation that requires immigrants to relinquish their previous nationality before applying for naturalization, the groups said.

“However, the revision still requires the applicant to provide a certificate proving they have given up their previous nationality within one year of naturalization, which is rather fast, as the process of nationality-renunciation can take up to three years in some countries,” TIFA office director Lee Tan-feng (李丹鳳) said.

TIFA member Chiu Hao-ting (邱皓庭) said the negotiation on the amendments among party caucuses, which is not open to public, should not compromise new immigrants’ rights.

This story has been viewed 3500 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top