The presence of Chinese National Institute for South China Sea Studies president Wu Shicun (吳士存) at the Exhibition on the Republic of China’s (ROC) Historical Data for the Southern Territories early this week has drawn concern among Taiwanese academics, who said it might have given Beijing the opportunity to gather information that it can use to justify its claims of sovereignty in the South China Sea when it presents its case before the International Court of Justice in The Hague, Netherlands, later this year.
China has been involved in a series of sovereignty conflicts over islands in the South China Sea, notably with Vietnam and the Philippines. Manila has responded by filing a complaint with the International Court for Arbitration, providing the court with more than 4,000 pages of evidence and analyses to counter Beijing’s claims.
Taiwan also lays claim to some of the islands, including the Pratas Islands (Dongsha Islands, 東沙群島) and the Itu Aba Island (Taiping Island, 太平島), the largest island in the Spratly Islands.
Explaining Taiwan’s claim, Taiwan Society of International Law deputy secretary-general Lin Ting-hui (林廷輝) said that the international community has long expressed an interest in how the “U-shaped” theory came into being.
The “U-shaped” theory refers to the ROC’s formal claim of sovereign territory in the South China Sea post-World War II, in accordance with agreements made in the Cairo Declaration of Nov. 27, 1943, and the Potsdam Declaration of July 26, 1945.
Several US thinktanks have urged Taiwan — ie, the ROC — to publish studies and proofs on how the lines were established and what their status in terms of international law are, Lin said.
While China holds data dating from the Ming and Qing dynasties, it lacks data from the period when the ROC was in control of China, Lin said.
These data are what support Taiwan’s claims in the South China Sea, and they should not be used to back up Chinese claims in the area, Lin said.
If the Chinese were able to gain any information from the exhibit to help defend their stance in December, it would work greatly to their benefit, Lin said.
Lin said he was puzzled why Vietnam and the Philippines did not send representatives when the exhibit opened on Monday, adding that all three countries should have sent representatives, or none at all.
Wu should not have been the only one to show up at the exhibit, Lin said.
He added that Taiwan should avoid the “one China” framework and avoid citing the “U-shaped” theory any more as it would give historical credence to China, as Beijing is viewed as the sole legal representative of China in the international community following UN Resolution 2758.
Taiwan should exert its sovereignty claim over the Pratas Islands and Itu Aba Island, Lin said, adding that the territories fall under the jurisdiction of Greater Kaohsiung.
Only then can Taiwan further its claims in accordance with International Maritime Law and avoid the “one China” framework, Lin said.
Wu arrived in Taiwan on Saturday last week, leading a delegation of researchers attending a closed-door conference on recent developments in the South China Sea and its impact on regional security and cross-strait relations.
The conference was hosted by National Chengchi University and National Taiwan Normal University.
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods