Taiwan should seize the opportunity presented by Japan’s recent removal of a ban on collective self-defense and seek to upgrade bilateral relations on economic and security cooperation, a think tank said yesterday.
“As a think tank, we support Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s removal of the ban on collective self-defense rights because it benefits Taiwan’s security,” Taiwan Brain Trust executive director Liu Shih-chung (劉世忠) told a symposium.
Liu urged President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration and Japan to do more for a comprehensive upgrade of bilateral ties, such as accelerating negotiations for a free-trade agreement and the inclusion of the Taiwan Strait in a scheduled revision of the Guidelines for US-Japan Defense Cooperation by the end of the year.
The executive director said the think tank also call on Tokyo to enact a “Japanese version” of the US’ Taiwan Relations Act to strengthen mutual ties and to clearly define its partnership with Taiwan based on democracy and peace.
Tokyo’s move has been welcomes by a majority of Taiwanese academics and politicians, but several academics warned in a forum this week that Taiwan “should not be overjoyed” because, in case Taiwan is attacked, Japan would not be able to help defend Taiwan if the US did not launch military action first.
Theoretically the argument was correct, Liu said, as Tokyo would not be able to respond before Washington does — in terms of the US-Japan Security Treaty.
However, he said, the scenarios in the real world could be very complicated, adding that how Tokyo and Washington respond to such a situation would depend on who the initiator of the conflict is, whether the US decides to engage, whether Japan would follow suit, and the costs and casualties once the US responds to a conflict, among other factors.
“It would be imperative for the Ma administration to engage in serious simulated scenario planning as to what Taiwan’s actions would be if it is attacked,” Liu said.
Ma’s comment on Monday that the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台), known as the Senkaku Islands in Japan, are stolen and unrecovered territory was “unceremonious and narrow-minded,” and appeared to have been an intentional attempt to provoke Japan, Liu said.
“Rather than taking a jab at Japan, what Ma should do right now is to secure defensive commitments from Japan and the US, because it serves Taiwan’s best interests,” he said.
Doong Sy-chi (董思齊), deputy secretary-general of the Taiwanese Association for Northeast Asia Studies, said Taiwan should closely observe how East Asian countries, in particular South Korea, react to Japan’s move and lay out Taiwan’s diplomatic and strategic goals.
Doong, an expert on Korean politics, said both South Korea and China appeared to have tried to use Japan’s relaxation of the ban for their own diplomatic leverage, as Seoul wanted to address its recent tension with Tokyo by shifting closer to Beijing, while Beijing cozied up to Seoul to fracture the alliance between South Korea, Japan and the US.
South Korea’s main objective is to maintain good relations with both China and the US, Doong said.
“It is up to Taiwan to draw up its own diplomatic plan and stick to it, rather than doing something because somebody else is doing something else,” he said.
FAST TRACK? Chinese spouses must renounce their Chinese citizenship and pledge allegiance to Taiwan to gain citizenship, some demonstrators said Opponents and supporters of a bill that would allow Chinese spouses to obtain Taiwanese citizenship in four years instead of six staged protests near the Legislative Yuan in Taipei yesterday morning. Those who oppose the bill proposed by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) demanded that Chinese spouses be granted citizenship only after renouncing their Chinese citizenship, passing a citizenship test and pledging allegiance to Taiwan. The demonstrators, who were protesting at a side entrance to the Legislative Yuan on Jinan Road, were mostly members of the Taiwan Association of University Professors and other organizations advocating Taiwanese independence. Supporters of the bill, led
SILENT MAJORITY: Only 1 percent of Chinese rejected all options but war to annex Taiwan, while one-third viewed war as unacceptable, a university study showed Many Chinese are more concerned with developments inside their country than with seeking unification with Taiwan, al-Jazeera reported on Friday. Although China claims Taiwan as its own territory and has vowed to annex it, by force if necessary, 23-year-old Chinese Shao Hongtian was quoted by al-Jazeera as saying that “hostilities are not the way to bring China and Taiwan together.” “I want unification to happen peacefully,” Shao said. Al-Jazeera said it changed Shao’s name to respect his wish for anonymity. If peaceful unification is not possible, Shao said he would prefer “things to remain as they are,” adding that many of his friends feel
Taiwan has “absolute air superiority” over China in its own airspace, Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) told a meeting of the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee on Monday, amid concern over whether Taipei could defend itself against a military incursion by Beijing. Po made the remarks in response to a question from Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Chiu Chih-wei (邱志偉) on whether Taiwan would have partial or complete air superiority if Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) warplanes were to enter Taiwan’s airspace. Po, a retired pilot, said that the Taiwanese military has “absolute air superiority” over PLA
A shipment of basil pesto imported by Costco Wholesale Taiwan from the US in the middle of last month was intercepted at the border after testing positive for excessive pesticide residue, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said yesterday. Samples taken from a shipment of the Kirkland Signature brand of basil pesto imported by Costco contained 0.1 milligrams per kilogram of ethylene oxide, exceeding the non-detectable limit. Ethylene oxide is a carcinogenic substance that can be used as a pesticide. The 674kg shipment of basil pesto would either be destroyed or returned to its country of origin, as is the procedure for all