Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairman Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) yesterday said the party does not “oppose everything related to China” as many people believe and has begun adjusting its China policy to make it more flexible and able to adapt to the changing dynamics of cross-strait relations.
Su’s comments came in response to a survey conducted by the DPP’s poll center, which found that 40.3 percent of respondents said the DPP’s mentality of “opposing everything related to China” was not acceptable.
The poll results were presented at meeting of the DPP’s China Affairs Committee on Thursday.
The survey conducted earlier this month, with 1,433 valid responses, found that 42.2 percent of the respondents said they were more comfortable with the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) China policy, while 35.2 percent were comfortable with the DPP’s.
The poll found that 45.7 percent of the respondents supported the KMT’s attitude toward exchanges with China, while 31.4 percent supported the DPP’s approach.
The least favorable side of the DPP’s China policy was its stance of opposing anything when it came to China, according to 40.7 percent of the respondents.
The poll found that 37.4 percent of the respondents felt the KMT was too accommodating to China’s demands, which they disliked.
Among the seven aspects of the two parties’ China policy, the DPP only has more public support — 36.5 percent — for its social policies than the KMT (32.1 percent).
In terms of overall policy, 35.2 percent of those polled said their stance on China issues is closer to that of the DPP, while 41.1 percent identified with the KMT’s stance.
Citing the cross-strait service trade agreement, Su said the DPP did not oppose the signing of the pact, but did demand the government safeguard the interests of the weak, national security and the universal values of freedom and democracy in its engagement with China.
Proof that the DPP has changed its approach to China affairs could be seen by the party demanding the service trade pact be renegotiated, while it had been flatly opposed to the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement signed in 2010.
There are certain matters the DPP must oppose, such as China’s “Anti-Secession” Law, which authorizes the use of “non-peaceful means” against Taiwan, Su said.
“The DPP is a democratic party that upholds Taiwan’s values,” he said. “It will not give up [the values] that need to be upheld. As for areas that it needs to do better, it will work harder on them.”
Meanwhile, former DPP chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), said the “right attitude” toward cross-strait exchanges was important, but the DPP might give the public a “fresh image” if it shows itself to be aggressively pushing for exchanges with China.
She said the DPP’s China policy had given an impression of “not being stable enough,” creating fears that it might incur “unpredictable dangers.”
However, the party should not talk lightly about changing its “basic stance,” she said, referring to another survey which indicated that the DPP’s “basic stance” in regard to Taiwan’s independence and unification with China was actually closer to the “public mood.”
That survey found that on a scale of zero to 10, with zero meaning unification with China and 10 meaning de jure independence for Taiwan, the KMT scored 3.33 and the DPP scored 6.90 — closer to the public mood, which stood at 6.20.
Additional reporting by Lee Hsin-fang
A year-long renovation of Taipei’s Bangka Park (艋舺公園) began yesterday, as city workers fenced off the site and cleared out belongings left by homeless residents who had been living there. Despite protests from displaced residents, a city official defended the government’s relocation efforts, saying transitional housing has been offered. The renovation of the park in Taipei’s Wanhua District (萬華), near Longshan Temple (龍山寺), began at 9am yesterday, as about 20 homeless people packed their belongings and left after being asked to move by city personnel. Among them was a 90-year-old woman surnamed Wang (王), who last week said that she had no plans
China might accelerate its strategic actions toward Taiwan, the South China Sea and across the first island chain, after the US officially entered a military conflict with Iran, as Beijing would perceive Washington as incapable of fighting a two-front war, a military expert said yesterday. The US’ ongoing conflict with Iran is not merely an act of retaliation or a “delaying tactic,” but a strategic military campaign aimed at dismantling Tehran’s nuclear capabilities and reshaping the regional order in the Middle East, said National Defense University distinguished adjunct lecturer Holmes Liao (廖宏祥), former McDonnell Douglas Aerospace representative in Taiwan. If
TO BE APPEALED: The environment ministry said coal reduction goals had to be reached within two months, which was against the principle of legitimate expectation The Taipei High Administrative Court on Thursday ruled in favor of the Taichung Environmental Protection Bureau in its administrative litigation against the Ministry of Environment for the rescission of a NT$18 million fine (US$609,570) imposed by the bureau on the Taichung Power Plant in 2019 for alleged excess coal power generation. The bureau in November 2019 revised what it said was a “slip of the pen” in the text of the operating permit granted to the plant — which is run by Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) — in October 2017. The permit originally read: “reduce coal use by 40 percent from Jan.
‘SPEY’ REACTION: Beijing said its Eastern Theater Command ‘organized troops to monitor and guard the entire process’ of a Taiwan Strait transit China sent 74 warplanes toward Taiwan between late Thursday and early yesterday, 61 of which crossed the median line in the Taiwan Strait. It was not clear why so many planes were scrambled, said the Ministry of National Defense, which tabulated the flights. The aircraft were sent in two separate tranches, the ministry said. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Thursday “confirmed and welcomed” a transit by the British Royal Navy’s HMS Spey, a River-class offshore patrol vessel, through the Taiwan Strait a day earlier. The ship’s transit “once again [reaffirmed the Strait’s] status as international waters,” the foreign ministry said. “Such transits by
RSS