More than 1,000 people from across the country took to the streets in Taipei yesterday, calling on the government to halt the construction of a Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) maintenance depot on the site of the partially demolished Losheng (Happy Life) Sanatorium, and to rebuild the sanatorium complex.
During the protest, a group of 120 people wearing white T-shirts and yellow headbands that read “Defend Losheng” walked in time with each drum beat and, at the sound of a cymbal, knelt down and touched the ground with their foreheads.
It was not a group of ascetic monks, but rather a group of Lo- sheng Sanatorium preservation activists who were trying to attract public attention for their cause.
 
                    Photo: Wu Liang-yi, Taipei Times
The sanatorium in Sinjhuang District (新莊), New Taipei City (新北市), was built in the 1930s to house people with Hansen’s disease (also known as leprosy), a disease at the time believed to be highly contagious and incurable.
Decades after its completion, residents who lived in the complex were forced to move as the Taipei City Department of Rapid Transit Systems (DORTS) planned to demolish the sanatorium complex and build a maintenance depot for the Sinjhuang MRT line.
The plan was met with strong opposition from Losheng residents and preservation activists.
However, the government decided to continue the construction after proposing an adjusted plan in 2007 that would preserve a small part of the complex while demolishing the rest.
In 2010, the preservation movement was revived after a series of landslides near the construction site — which the preservationists had already warned on — which led several times to the suspension of construction.
Although DORTS is yet to propose a plan to solve the landslide issue, construction was resumed earlier this month after being suspended for about a year, causing concerns among activists and residents that the hill on which the sanatorium is built may collapse.
“I was indifferent to the issue years ago when activists campaigned for the preservation of Losheng Sanatorium, but when I had a chance to learn more about the issue, I became upset at myself for not realizing the importance at the time,” said Lin Kun-chang, a Sinjhuang resident taking part in the parade group. “I volunteered to join the ascetic group to make up for my past ignorance, and I hope that more people who are as indifferent as I was will become aware.”
Following the group was a large flag with the logo of the sanatorium held up by a dozen demonstrators, Losheng residents in wheelchairs, members of civic and student groups, as well as participants from all over the nation.
“In 2010, the [maintenance depot] construction was suspended because of a landslide. A year later, DORTS said they were better prepared and resumed the construction. However, within six months, the construction had to be halted again because of another landslide,” said Wang Wei-min (王偉民), a civil engineer and a long-time supporter of the preservation movement. “The same thing has happened over and over again. We no longer trust DORTS.”
“When you make enough mistakes, your boss may simply fire you — as masters of the nation, we certainly have the right to tell DORTS to stop,” he added.
When the parade reached the DORTS headquarters, the crowd shouted: “Face the mistakes, move the depot” and stuck hundreds of stickers that read “DORTS lies” onto the plaque bearing the agency’s name outside the building.
After arriving at Ketagalan Boulevard, the crowd chanted slogans and sang songs asking the government to take its responsibility and halt the construction.
On behalf of his peers, Losheng resident Tang Hsiang-ming (湯祥明) thanked the participants for their support along the way.

The German city of Hamburg on Oct. 14 named a bridge “Kaohsiung-Brucke” after the Taiwanese city of Kaohsiung. The footbridge, formerly known as F566, is to the east of the Speicherstadt, the world’s largest warehouse district, and connects the Dar-es-Salaam-Platz to the Brooktorpromenade near the Port of Hamburg on the Elbe River. Timo Fischer, a Free Democratic Party member of the Hamburg-Mitte District Assembly, in May last year proposed the name change with support from members of the Social Democratic Party and the Christian Democratic Union. Kaohsiung and Hamburg in 1999 inked a sister city agreement, but despite more than a quarter-century of

Taiwanese officials are courting podcasters and influencers aligned with US President Donald Trump as they grow more worried the US leader could undermine Taiwanese interests in talks with China, people familiar with the matter said. Trump has said Taiwan would likely be on the agenda when he is expected to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) next week in a bid to resolve persistent trade tensions. China has asked the White House to officially declare it “opposes” Taiwanese independence, Bloomberg reported last month, a concession that would mark a major diplomatic win for Beijing. President William Lai (賴清德) and his top officials

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) yesterday expressed “grave concerns” after Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong (黃循財) reiterated the city-state’s opposition to “Taiwanese independence” during a meeting with Chinese Premier Li Qiang (李強). In Singapore on Saturday, Wong and Li discussed cross-strait developments, the Singaporean Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. “Prime Minister Wong reiterated that Singapore has a clear and consistent ‘one China’ policy and is opposed to Taiwan independence,” it said. MOFA responded that it is an objective fact and a common understanding shared by many that the Republic of China (ROC) is an independent, sovereign nation, with world-leading

‘ONE CHINA’: A statement that Berlin decides its own China policy did not seem to sit well with Beijing, which offered only one meeting with the German official German Minister for Foreign Affairs Johann Wadephul’s trip to China has been canceled, a spokesperson for his ministry said yesterday, amid rising tensions between the two nations, including over Taiwan. Wadephul had planned to address Chinese curbs on rare earths during his visit, but his comments about Berlin deciding on the “design” of its “one China” policy ahead of the trip appear to have rankled China. Asked about Wadephul’s comments, Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Guo Jiakun (郭嘉昆) said the “one China principle” has “no room for any self-definition.” In the interview published on Thursday, Wadephul said he would urge China to