The Legislative Yuan’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee yesterday passed a motion chastising National Security Council (NSC) Secretary-General Jason Yuan (袁健生) for being absent from a committee meeting specifically held to address the government’s assessment of the situation following China’s unilateral declaration of an air defense identification zone (ADIZ).
Among the officials invited by the legislative committee were Yuan, Minister of National Defense Yen Ming (嚴明), National Security Bureau Director Tsai Der-sheng (蔡得勝), Minister of Foreign Affairs David Lin (林永樂), Deputy Minister of Transportation and Communications Chen Chun-ching (陳純淨) and Mainland Affairs Council Deputy Minister Chang Hsien-yao (張顯耀).
However, Yuan did not accede to the committee’s repeated requests to attend the meeting to report on the government’s stance and policies with regard to Beijing’s move to create the zone.
Photo: Chen Chih-chu, Taipei Times
The NSC is the main government unit that makes policies and decides on the responses to such issues, said committee convener Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Chiu Yi-ying (邱議瑩), explaining why Yuan was summoned.
That the NSB secretary-general, who by rights should report to the legislature on all issues of national security and whose bureau is responsible for the government’s policy concerning the ADIZ, should be missing from such a crucial meeting was incredible, Chiu said.
In a vote, the committee later passed a motion condemning Yuan for his failure to attend the hearing.
At the meeting, DPP Legislator Tsai Huang-liang (蔡煌瑯) said the inaction of the administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) when China was practically knocking at the nation’s door was only encouraging Beijing’s belligerence.
“Yuan [thinks he] is sly, but the committee is willing to give Yuan more time; it only takes five minutes to get to the Legislative Yuan from the NSC,” Tsai said before the vote was passed, adding that by refusing to attend the meeting Yuan was evidently trying to avoid his responsibility.
DPP Legislator Mark Chen (陳唐山), who has previously served as foreign minister, said that though there is a precedent for the NSC head being absent from the legislature, the establishment of the air zone should be considered an incident of grave importance and Yuan should have attended the meeting.
“Yuan must make a report to the legislature on this matter,” Chen said. “Only by doing so can the Ma administration show that it is being a responsible government.”
Meanwhile, DPP Legislator Chen Ou-po (陳歐珀) criticized the myriad stances of the officials in Ma’s Cabinet.
“At best, they only dare to say they regret China’s decision, but they have not expressed their opposition,” Chen Ou-po said.
Chen Ou-po then asked all five of the invited officials to “please raise your hand if you feel that China’s establishment of the ADIZ in the East China Sea is an unfriendly gesture.”
Yen, Tsai and Chen Chun-ching raised their hands, while Lin and Chang did not.
When pressed to make clear their stance on the issue, Yen said that China’s action was an “unfriendly” move and that although part of China’s air defense zone overlaps with Taiwan’s, Beijing “did not consult us beforehand.”
Lin said repeatedly that Taiwan has already expressed its stance on the issue, while Chang said the council has expressed its opinions to China’s Taiwan Affairs Office through the proper channels.
China might accelerate its strategic actions toward Taiwan, the South China Sea and across the first island chain, after the US officially entered a military conflict with Iran, as Beijing would perceive Washington as incapable of fighting a two-front war, a military expert said yesterday. The US’ ongoing conflict with Iran is not merely an act of retaliation or a “delaying tactic,” but a strategic military campaign aimed at dismantling Tehran’s nuclear capabilities and reshaping the regional order in the Middle East, said National Defense University distinguished adjunct lecturer Holmes Liao (廖宏祥), former McDonnell Douglas Aerospace representative in Taiwan. If
TO BE APPEALED: The environment ministry said coal reduction goals had to be reached within two months, which was against the principle of legitimate expectation The Taipei High Administrative Court on Thursday ruled in favor of the Taichung Environmental Protection Bureau in its administrative litigation against the Ministry of Environment for the rescission of a NT$18 million fine (US$609,570) imposed by the bureau on the Taichung Power Plant in 2019 for alleged excess coal power generation. The bureau in November 2019 revised what it said was a “slip of the pen” in the text of the operating permit granted to the plant — which is run by Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) — in October 2017. The permit originally read: “reduce coal use by 40 percent from Jan.
‘SPEY’ REACTION: Beijing said its Eastern Theater Command ‘organized troops to monitor and guard the entire process’ of a Taiwan Strait transit China sent 74 warplanes toward Taiwan between late Thursday and early yesterday, 61 of which crossed the median line in the Taiwan Strait. It was not clear why so many planes were scrambled, said the Ministry of National Defense, which tabulated the flights. The aircraft were sent in two separate tranches, the ministry said. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Thursday “confirmed and welcomed” a transit by the British Royal Navy’s HMS Spey, a River-class offshore patrol vessel, through the Taiwan Strait a day earlier. The ship’s transit “once again [reaffirmed the Strait’s] status as international waters,” the foreign ministry said. “Such transits by
Taiwan is doing everything it can to prevent a military conflict with China, including building up asymmetric defense capabilities and fortifying public resilience, Vice President Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) said in a recent interview. “Everything we are doing is to prevent a conflict from happening, whether it is 2027 or before that or beyond that,” Hsiao told American podcaster Shawn Ryan of the Shawn Ryan Show. She was referring to a timeline cited by several US military and intelligence officials, who said Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the Chinese People’s Liberation Army to be ready to take military action against Taiwan