President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) interpretation of the Cairo Declaration, issued on Dec. 1, 1943, as the legal basis of Taiwan’s “return” to the Republic of China (ROC) after World War II was not only incorrect, but also dangerous because his rhetoric was exactly the same as that of Beijing, pro-independence advocates said yesterday.
“[Ma’s interpretation] fits right in with the ‘one China’ framework, which would be interpreted by the international community as saying Taiwan is part of China because hardly anyone would recognize the China in ‘one China’ framework as referring to the ROC,” Taiwan Society President Chang Yen-hsien (張炎憲), a former president of the Academia Historica, told a press conference.
The Treaty of San Francisco, signed on Sept. 8, 1951, should have been the only legal document to determine Taiwan’s status, not the Cairo Declaration in 1943, nor the Potsdam Declaration of 1945, Chang and other experts said at the press conference, held almost at the same time as a commemoration ceremony for the 70th anniversary of the First Cairo Conference, organized by the Presidential Office.
Photo: Wang Min-wei, Taipei Times
Since Ma took the same position on the declaration as Beijing, which cited it as the legal basis for Taiwan’s return to China, he is risking two important issues, said Vincent Chen (陳文賢), a professor at National Chengchi University’s Graduate Institute of Taiwan History.
“With Ma taking the same position, Beijing could bolster its argument about Chinese sovereignty over the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台), which it claimed had been returned to China along with Taiwan and Penghu in the declaration,” Chen said.
“[Ma’s] adherence to the ‘one-China’ framework could, in the long run, create a false perception among the international community that Taipei and Beijing would follow the post-World War II unification models of Vietnam and Germany and unify in the future,” he said.
While the declaration, which was released in the form of a press communique after the meeting of Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), then-US president Franklin Roosevelt and then-British prime minister Winston Churchill in Cairo, said that “all the territories Japan has stolen from the Chinese, such as Manchuria, Formosa, and the Pescadores, shall be restored to the Republic of China,” the ROC referred to the country which was in the state of war with Japan, not the country which is now in Taiwan with different people and territory from “the old ROC,” Taiwan Nation Alliance convener Yao Chia-wen (姚嘉文) said.
The context of the Cairo Declaration would be better interpreted by examining the post-World War II developments and comments made by leaders of involved countries, the advocates said.
Yao said that Churchill told the British parliament on Feb. 1, 1955, that he would not accept the view that the declaration could be used as a binding document to claim that China has sovereignty over Taiwan, adding that Japan’s prime minister and foreign minister had also made it clear that Japan renounced its claim over Taiwan and did not hand it to anyone.
Since the declaration was not a treaty but a communique, it did not transfer Taiwan’s sovereignty, Provisional Government of Formosa executive secretary Sim Kian-tek (沈建德) said.
Moreover, the communique was not signed by any leaders because Roosevelt and Churchill had different views about how to handle Taiwan’s future, Sim said.
FEELING MISUNDERSTOOD: Media speculation has fueled confusion about the KMT’s reasons for skipping a Chinese forum and delaying an AIT meeting, party sources said The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on Sunday said that it is not seeking to improve relations with the US or China at the expense of the other, and that its relations with the countries would be topic-based. The party has faced questions over its foreign policy after it on Monday last week announced its withdrawal from the annual Straits Forum and delayed planned talks with the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT). The party has also taken a tough stance on the importation of US meat containing ractopamine, while also lambasting China for increasing its military activity in and around the Taiwan Strait. Following
Taipei City Councilor Wang Hao (王浩) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on Monday called for security improvements to the MRT, as fare evasion has increased more than 13-fold on the metropolitan railway system over the past five years. Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) has spoken out against fare evasion and other contraventions of MRT regulations, but since he took office in 2015 the number of contraventions has more than doubled, Wang said, adding that there were 537 cases in 2015 compared with 959 last year. A video was posted to YouTube in June showing people how to evade paying a fare,
AN EXAMPLE: After attending a memorial service for Lee Teng-hui, Mori said the former president’s career reflected the importance of peace and democracy Using military force to resolve conflict is no longer workable in this new era, which requires peaceful discussion, former Japanese prime minister Yoshiro Mori said yesterday before leaving Taipei. Mori made the remarks at a news conference in front of the EVA Sky Jet Center at Taipei International Airport (Songshan airport), after leading a delegation to attend the official memorial service for former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) in New Taipei City’s Tamsui District (淡水). This was Mori’s second trip to mourn Lee; his last was on Aug. 9. Although he walked with a crutch, Mori, 83, chose to stand right in front of
CONTROVERSY: NHIA Director-General Lee Po-chang said an outcry over overseas Taiwanese not paying premiums, but having coverage, is pushing rule amendments Rules changes are being considered that would force Taiwanese who permanently live abroad to pay National Health Insurance (NHI) premiums for the period they were overseas before they can re-enroll in the system, National Health Insurance Administration (NHIA) Director-General Lee Po-chang (李伯璋) yesterday said. The case of a married Taiwanese couple who lived in the US for about 30 years, but returned to Taiwan in April and tested positive for COVID-19 has again sparked public debate over why Taiwanese living abroad are allowed to use NHI resources, — although the couple’s expenses were not covered by the NHI. An often cited example