The Special Investigation Division (SID) of the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office, which has been in the eye of a recent political storm, should be abolished because of its inherent illegitimacy and unconstitutionality, as well as the design of the special prosecutors system, legal experts said yesterday in Taipei.
“Let me say this: Taiwan would not become a worse place to live without the SID, but it will become more chaotic if the division is kept,” lawyer Cheng Wen-lung (鄭文龍) told a forum organized by Taiwan Forever Association to discuss the increasing calls to scrap the division.
The SID has failed to accomplish its mission of probing corruption cases involving officials at minister-level or higher since 2008, with the bribery case involving former Executive Yuan deputy secretary-general Lin Yi-shih (林益世) — which was investigated after media broke the story — the only exception, Cheng said.
Photo: Liao Chen-huei, Taipei Times
The division instead focuses on prosecuting cases involving former officials of the previous Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administration, including former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), with selective investigation a prevalent practice, he added.
There have been growing cries for eliminating the SID, which has been embroiled in controversies related to its wiretapping of the legislature, not only because it malfunctions and infringes on the Constitution, but also because it has become a tool for politicians to pursue their political agendas, the lawyer said.
Hsu Hui-feng (許惠峰), a professor of law at the Chinese Culture University, said the division was doomed to fail because of systemic flaws.
“I would say that the SID has become an agency everyone loves to hate not because the prosecutors in the division are incompetent, but because of the design of the prosecutorial system and a lack of courage and justice among prosecutors,” Hsu said.
Since the prosecutor-general — who is appointed by the president — is authorized to designate all the SID’s prosecutors, it is inevitable that the division acquires a political nature, he said, adding that this system gives the president and the majority party influence over the SID.
Another serious flaw of the division is that, unlike local prosecutors’ offices — which can be supervised by the High Prosecutors’ Office — no institution is able to monitor the division, Hsu said.
That explained why the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) did not favor removing Article 63-1 from the Organic Act of Court Organization (法院組織法), which stipulates the SID’s establishment and mission, DPP Legislator Wu Yi-chen (吳宜臻) said.
A Legislative Yuan resolution on Sept. 25 demanded that the SID stop working and transfer its ongoing cases to local prosecutors’ offices, but the division has refused, saying that the resolution is not legally binding.
High Prosecutors’ Office prosecutor Lu Ting-wang (呂丁旺) said it was almost certain that the SID would abuse its authority because of the power concentrated in it, as well as the lack of checks and balances to keep it under control.
However, Lu said that has no one to blame but itself because the division was established in 2007 under the then-DPP government.
China might accelerate its strategic actions toward Taiwan, the South China Sea and across the first island chain, after the US officially entered a military conflict with Iran, as Beijing would perceive Washington as incapable of fighting a two-front war, a military expert said yesterday. The US’ ongoing conflict with Iran is not merely an act of retaliation or a “delaying tactic,” but a strategic military campaign aimed at dismantling Tehran’s nuclear capabilities and reshaping the regional order in the Middle East, said National Defense University distinguished adjunct lecturer Holmes Liao (廖宏祥), former McDonnell Douglas Aerospace representative in Taiwan. If
TO BE APPEALED: The environment ministry said coal reduction goals had to be reached within two months, which was against the principle of legitimate expectation The Taipei High Administrative Court on Thursday ruled in favor of the Taichung Environmental Protection Bureau in its administrative litigation against the Ministry of Environment for the rescission of a NT$18 million fine (US$609,570) imposed by the bureau on the Taichung Power Plant in 2019 for alleged excess coal power generation. The bureau in November 2019 revised what it said was a “slip of the pen” in the text of the operating permit granted to the plant — which is run by Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) — in October 2017. The permit originally read: “reduce coal use by 40 percent from Jan.
‘SPEY’ REACTION: Beijing said its Eastern Theater Command ‘organized troops to monitor and guard the entire process’ of a Taiwan Strait transit China sent 74 warplanes toward Taiwan between late Thursday and early yesterday, 61 of which crossed the median line in the Taiwan Strait. It was not clear why so many planes were scrambled, said the Ministry of National Defense, which tabulated the flights. The aircraft were sent in two separate tranches, the ministry said. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Thursday “confirmed and welcomed” a transit by the British Royal Navy’s HMS Spey, a River-class offshore patrol vessel, through the Taiwan Strait a day earlier. The ship’s transit “once again [reaffirmed the Strait’s] status as international waters,” the foreign ministry said. “Such transits by
Taiwan is doing everything it can to prevent a military conflict with China, including building up asymmetric defense capabilities and fortifying public resilience, Vice President Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) said in a recent interview. “Everything we are doing is to prevent a conflict from happening, whether it is 2027 or before that or beyond that,” Hsiao told American podcaster Shawn Ryan of the Shawn Ryan Show. She was referring to a timeline cited by several US military and intelligence officials, who said Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the Chinese People’s Liberation Army to be ready to take military action against Taiwan
RSS