Budget cuts have left US President Barack Obama’s “pivot” to Asia without any real teeth and may in the process have increased Taiwan’s vulnerability, a team of US military experts said on Wednesday.
With one exception, Beijing’s warship building program has followed moderate growth, National War College professor Bernard Cole said.
The exception, he said, was that since 2000 China has built almost 40 conventionally powered submarines in addition to a new class of nuclear-powered boat.
“I think this represents what is for Beijing the No. 1 strategic objective — the status of Taiwan,” Cole said.
He told a panel discussion at the Heritage Foundation that if China decides to use force against Taiwan to prevent independence it will rely heavily on submarines.
“If they can sortie two or three dozen submarines, that would slow or prevent effective US naval intervention for quite a period of time,” Cole said. “Hence, they continue to build conventionally powered submarines.”
Cole said that China’s nuclear-powered submarine program was in “something of a hiatus,” but that Beijing still intends to develop nuclear attack and ballistic missile submarines.
The panel discussion titled “What Asia Pivot?” also included former US secretary of the navy David Winter, Vanderbilt University military expert James Auer and senior Heritage Foundation fellow Bruce Klingner.
They agreed that the Obama administration’s defense strategy and its “pivot” have been undercut by a lack of resources.
“Even as the number of threats to global peace and stability continues to multiply, there has not been a commensurate increase of US capabilities,” a Heritage Foundation introduction to the discussion read.
“To what degree will massive defense cuts and reductions in the overall US military structure constrain America’s global power projection and force sustainability in the Pacific?” it asked.
The greatest worry for the US right now is the Chinese submarine fleet, Auer said.
“There is no pivot in the Asia pivot, it is a change in focus rather than forces,” he said.
Cole said that in every Taiwan crisis from 1950 to 1996 Beijing miscalculated what the likely US response would be.
“In some of those cases it had to do with statements by political leaders in [the US], but in other cases it had to do with [Beijing’s] observation of where US forces were committed,” Cole said. “I could easily foresee a situation where the aircraft carrier George Washington was undergoing a complex overhaul and where two other carriers were in the Persian Gulf.”
He said in those circumstances a Chinese naval planner might conclude it would take the US weeks to get a carrier in place.
As a result, Cole said, the planner might “paint a certain tactical picture” that could lead the People’s Liberation Army to make “certain strategic recommendations” to the leadership in Beijing.
“I think the Chinese very carefully track where possible opposing naval forces are located,” Cole said.
A reduction in the US fleet as a result of budget cuts could lead the US Navy to cut its presence in Asia.
The discussion took place as Taiwan was receiving the first of 12 P-3C Orion anti-submarine aircraft from the US. The other 11 are due to be delivered by 2015.
The aircraft can detect submarines on and below the surface, and carry powerful anti-ship and anti-submarine attack weapons.
Taiwan would benefit from more integrated military strategies and deployments if the US and its allies treat the East China Sea, the Taiwan Strait and the South China Sea as a “single theater of operations,” a Taiwanese military expert said yesterday. Shen Ming-shih (沈明室), a researcher at the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, said he made the assessment after two Japanese military experts warned of emerging threats from China based on a drill conducted this month by the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) Eastern Theater Command. Japan Institute for National Fundamentals researcher Maki Nakagawa said the drill differed from the
‘WORSE THAN COMMUNISTS’: President William Lai has cracked down on his political enemies and has attempted to exterminate all opposition forces, the chairman said The legislature would motion for a presidential recall after May 20, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) said yesterday at a protest themed “against green communists and dictatorship” in Taipei. Taiwan is supposed to be a peaceful homeland where people are united, but President William Lai (賴清德) has been polarizing and tearing apart society since his inauguration, Chu said. Lai must show his commitment to his job, otherwise a referendum could be initiated to recall him, he said. Democracy means the rule of the people, not the rule of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), but Lai has failed to fulfill his
OFF-TARGET: More than 30,000 participants were expected to take part in the Games next month, but only 6,550 foreign and 19,400 Taiwanese athletes have registered Taipei city councilors yesterday blasted the organizers of next month’s World Masters Games over sudden timetable and venue changes, which they said have caused thousands of participants to back out of the international sporting event, among other organizational issues. They also cited visa delays and political interference by China as reasons many foreign athletes are requesting refunds for the event, to be held from May 17 to 30. Jointly organized by the Taipei and New Taipei City governments, the games have been rocked by numerous controversies since preparations began in 2020. Taipei City Councilor Lin Yen-feng (林延鳳) said yesterday that new measures by
A rally held by opposition parties yesterday demonstrates that Taiwan is a democratic country, President William Lai (賴清德) said yesterday, adding that if opposition parties really want to fight dictatorship, they should fight it on Tiananmen Square in Beijing. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) held a protest with the theme “against green communists and dictatorship,” and was joined by the Taiwan People’s Party. Lai said the opposition parties are against what they called the “green communists,” but do not fight against the “Chinese communists,” adding that if they really want to fight dictatorship, they should go to the right place and face