Ever since his return to Taiwan late last month, Chang An-le (張安樂), a wanted fugitive and former leader of the Bamboo Union triad, has sought to remind people in Taiwan that he has written a booklet promoting the “peaceful re-unification” of Taiwan and China.
Even when a SWAT team picked him up at Taipei International Airport (Songshan airport) after he disembarked from an airplane from Shanghai on June 29, the handcuffed Chang was able to display his political tract so that the dozens of photographers and journalists who had gathered to cover his return could catch it on film and report it.
Soon after he was released on NT$1 million (US$33,000) bail that same day, the “White Wolf” — as he is called in the underworld — started appearing on TV talk shows desperate for a ratings boost, where besides promoting his political views and demonstrating just how out of touch with Taiwan’s political scene he has become after an absence of 17 years, he made sure to flash the booklet.
Photo: J. Michael Cole, Taipei Times
After the repeated appearances the pamphlet, Peaceful Unification and One County (和平統一、一國兩制), has made in the weeks since his return, I decided to obtain a copy to see what I could learn about Chang’s plans for the future of China and Taiwan, especially now that the Unionist Party he created while he was exiled in China has stated its intention to field candidates in next year’s local elections, and perhaps even in the 2016 presidential election.
I needed to see what Chang, who served 10 years in jail in the US for drug trafficking and who played a role in the 1984 assassination of journalist Henry Liu (劉宜良) in California, had to say about his plans for unification.
Another reason I wanted to sample the literature stemmed from the high likelihood that the Chinese Community Party’s (CCP) United Front efforts to solve the “Taiwan problem” include using criminal organizations. With Chang now a free man — given that no date appears to have been set for his trial and his close relationship with some political figures in China and Taiwan — I was curious to find out whether he might be part of such efforts by the CCP.
Although it is impossible to verify his sources, exiled Chinese writer Yuan Hongbing (袁紅冰) claims in his book, The Taiwan Crisis, to have come upon high-level classified information confirming the role of organized crime in Beijing’s “reunification” efforts.
The Unionist Party’s office is located in Taipei’s Songshan District (松山). On my way there last week, I did not know what to expect, but I vividly remembered the assortment of characters that had gathered by the hundreds on June 29 to celebrate Chang’s return.
When I reached the nondescript building, I scanned the various company signs displayed in the lobby and found that party’s office was still there, on the fourth floor. I went up in the cramped elevator, various scenarios — some rather violent, albeit newsworthy — playing through my head.
It was very likely that I was the first foreigner ever to visit the party headquarters, and based on my previous experiences with pro-unification figures in Taiwan, they tend to have a bit of a xenophobic streak.
A woman passing by regarded me with a strange expression on her face as I walked toward the closed glass front door, where a large yellow-and-blue sign bearing a logo of two clasped hands — ostensibly representing the warmth of the people on both sides of the Taiwan Strait — confirmed that I had reached my destination.
I pressed the ringer, not knowing whether there would be anyone there. It was 11:45am, but the UP is not the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) or the Democratic Progressive Party — a lot of people in Taiwan are not even aware of its existence.
There was no answer, but at 1.83m tall, I was able to look in through the top section of the door that was not smoked glass. A man, somewhere in his sixties, was seated at a desk at the far corner of the room, speaking on the telephone. No lovely receptionist at the UP — at least not yet.
I pushed the door and it offered no resistance. After I had waited for a minute or so, the man concluded his call and came over, greeting me in Mandarin. I replied that I was a journalist and was wondering whether they had copies of the booklet that Chang had been promoting.
“Of course, of course,” the man said, ushering me into a conference room on my left, where he left me alone as he went back to his desk.
The otherwise empty room had two salient features: a large People’s Republic of China (PRC) flag, which contrasted sharply with the egg-white walls, and a large collection of photographs — hundreds of them — pasted on a wall showing Chang in various places he had visited in China, along with the many influential CCP figures he had brushed elbows with over the years.
This was one of those moments when I regretted not bringing my camera, but then again, I am not sure how the staff would have reacted if I had started snapping pictures with my Nikon.
My host promptly returned, holding a small stack of the booklets I had requested, though they were smaller than the one Chang had flashed on TV. He then escorted me to another door at the far end of the conference room, which gave way to another office.
In there, another man was seated at a desk — larger, made of finer wood, which I guessed meant he was a more important figure within the party — sucking on a cigarette.
My first instinct was to remind him that under Taipei City Government regulations, it was illegal to smoke inside commercial buildings, but I thought better of it.
The man, who was in his fifties, short, slightly overweight, with stained teeth, looked more the kind of person who had given Chang a bad reputation in the 1980s — in other words, more like a gangster — than the political staffer that one expects to see at a party’s headquarters.
He stood up from behind his desk and I greeted him, repeating that I was a journalist hoping to get some of the UP’s literature.
“How many do you want?” he asked in Mandarin.
“Would two be all right?” I asked.
“Have five — six,” he said.
They gave me five, which the man in his sixties placed inside a yellow envelope, either for convenience or to hide the contents.
We stood there in silence and the pair seemed to be waiting for me to ask them questions. Since I had a previous engagement, I told them that all I wanted for the time being was a copy of their booklet so I could familiarize myself with Chang’s vision.
They escorted me out, the short man smiling and thanking me profusely, his left hand cupping his right fist and shaking up and down, a symbol of gratitude in this part of the world.
“You wouldn’t happen to have an English-language version?” I asked.
“Sorry, only Chinese. You understand Chinese, right?” the shorter man said.
“Yes,” I replied as I made for the door.
We said goodbye and I left.
They were polite, welcoming. Interestingly, they never asked me which media organization I worked for, nor did they ask for a business card or some confirmation that I was a reporter. Maybe they need good publicity, given the political ambitions of Chang, who is now promoting himself as a sort of high priest of unification.
As for the 48-page booklet (the last two pages are blank, for note-taking), parts of it read as if it had been penned by Chang’s grandson, with one passage stating: “Taiwanese who oppose unification are like an ostrich... When Taiwan and China are reunited, China will be friends with the entire world.”
Chang’s booklet is borderline silly and its contents are unlikely to convince many Taiwanese of the benefits of unification. The White Wolf has plans for Taiwan, but his plans hardly reflect what its 23 million people hope for their future.
Taiwan might be China’s next target after it has “walled off” Hong Kong from the rest of the world with its new national security legislation, Academia Sinica Institute of Sociology fellow Wu Jieh-min (吳介民) said on Thursday. At a seminar organized by the Economic Democracy Union, the Taiwan Association for Human Rights, the Hong Kong Outlanders and the Judicial Reform Foundation, Wu said that the legislation is simultaneously a fig leaf concealing Beijing’s autocratic rule in Hong Kong and a figurative “Berlin Wall,” denying democratic countries access to Hong Kong. Wu said it is evident that Taiwan would be China’s next target. The
SAFETY CONCERNS: A construction company working nearby admitted to negligence in the incident, and is to pay a fine and other expenses related to damages Residents of homes adjacent to an alleyway in New Taipei City’s Yonghe District (永和) on Saturday were forced to evacuate their homes after the road collapsed, the New Taipei City government said yesterday. An 80m by 4m area in an alleyway on Wenhua Road (文化路) collapsed at 10:39am near an apartment building construction site where work was being done on the project’s foundation. The incident also ruptured an underground gas pipe and tilted several buildings in the area. Residents would not be able to return to their homes until tomorrow or Wednesday, when repairs are expected to be finished, the city government said. Workers
CHALLENGER DEEP: Lin Ying-Tsong was invited by Caladan Oceanic founder Victor Vescovo to join him on a 10-hour long trip in the company’s submersible Taiwanese-American Lin Ying-Tsong (林穎聰) last month became the first person from Asia and the 12th in human history to dive into the deepest part on Earth, the Challenger Deep in the Mariana Trench. Lin, 45, an expert in deep sea acoustics with the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) in Massachusetts, joined US adventurer and Caladan Oceanic founder Victor Vescovo, 54, on June 22 in a descent to the central pool of the Challenger Deep, the deepest point of the trench, which lies at a depth of more than 10,900m. The pair made the descent in a submersible named Limiting Factor, a US$37
ARMS RACE: Two DPP lawmakers said that China’s development model differed from Taiwan’s, as it aims to become a global hegemon, while Taiwan seeks to protect itself Taiwanese national defense experts are split on how Taiwan should respond to the ever-growing budget of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA), with some advocating for Taiwan to increase defense spending, while others say that little can be done. The Legislative Yuan approved NT$358 billion (US$12.1 billion) for national defense spending across fiscal 2020, a 3.47 percent increase compared with last year, while China’s military budget this year is NT$5.4 trillion, more than 15 times that of Taiwan. Regardless of whether the government adopts a zero-based budgeting method for national defense spending — in which all expenses are justified and approved each