Former premier Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) pushed for a rebalancing of exchanges between Taiwan and China at a high-profile symposium on cross-strait relations in Hong Kong yesterday.
In his keynote speech, Hsieh said cross-strait interactions have become increasingly narrowed to exchanges between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), with potentially serious consequences.
“This could cause undercurrents and trigger backlashes that would lead to an imbalance between the functions of political parties and the conducting of cross-strait exchanges,” he said.
“Cross-strait interactions are not the same as KMT-CCP interactions,” he said at the start of the two-day forum hosted by the Taiwan Reform Foundation — which he chairs — and the Chinese Academy of Social Science’s Taiwan Research Institute.
Hsieh said there are two major stances in Taiwanese mainstream public opinion regarding ties with China: one is the hope for cross-strait peace and commercial exchanges that create mutual prosperity; the other is the desire to maintain self-rule and preserve democratic values.
Whichever party holds power in Taiwan must maintain a balance between those two stances, something he hinted was not happening at present, Hsieh said.
“People in Taiwan today are worried about the model of the KMT and CCP monopolizing exchanges. They are concerned that the ‘status quo’ is being undermined and that democratic mechanisms are being distorted,” said Hsieh, who stressed that he was not representing the DPP at the forum.
Taiwan Research Institute director Yu Keli (余克禮) challenged Hsieh’s contention, saying that China welcomed Taiwanese from all circles to participate in cross-strait exchanges and that it was the DPP which had barred its members from engaging with Beijing in the past.
Yu also questioned the notion that the KMT and CCP were holding negotiations. Yu said that on June 7, 1991, the Chinese government authorized officials in charge of Taiwan affairs to begin talks with the Taiwanese government, and defined them as “cross-strait negotiations,” not “inter-party negotiations.”
On Jan. 31, 1995, then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) proposed that the two sides hold talks on ending cross-strait hostilities under the “one China” principle. Since then, “KMT-CCP negotiations” have been relegated to the dustbin of history, Yu said.
Now, “we expect to have joint discussions with all sectors in Taiwan on the peaceful development of cross-strait relations,” he said.
Yu did not mention the series of high-level meetings held between leaders of the KMT and the CCP since 2005, the most recent of which involved former KMT chairman Wu Poh-hsiung (吳伯雄) and CCP General-Secretary and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on June 13.
Wu’s use of the “one China” framework to describe cross-strait ties then has met strong criticism.
The German city of Hamburg on Oct. 14 named a bridge “Kaohsiung-Brucke” after the Taiwanese city of Kaohsiung. The footbridge, formerly known as F566, is to the east of the Speicherstadt, the world’s largest warehouse district, and connects the Dar-es-Salaam-Platz to the Brooktorpromenade near the Port of Hamburg on the Elbe River. Timo Fischer, a Free Democratic Party member of the Hamburg-Mitte District Assembly, in May last year proposed the name change with support from members of the Social Democratic Party and the Christian Democratic Union. Kaohsiung and Hamburg in 1999 inked a sister city agreement, but despite more than a quarter-century of
Taiwanese officials are courting podcasters and influencers aligned with US President Donald Trump as they grow more worried the US leader could undermine Taiwanese interests in talks with China, people familiar with the matter said. Trump has said Taiwan would likely be on the agenda when he is expected to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) next week in a bid to resolve persistent trade tensions. China has asked the White House to officially declare it “opposes” Taiwanese independence, Bloomberg reported last month, a concession that would mark a major diplomatic win for Beijing. President William Lai (賴清德) and his top officials
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) yesterday expressed “grave concerns” after Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong (黃循財) reiterated the city-state’s opposition to “Taiwanese independence” during a meeting with Chinese Premier Li Qiang (李強). In Singapore on Saturday, Wong and Li discussed cross-strait developments, the Singaporean Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. “Prime Minister Wong reiterated that Singapore has a clear and consistent ‘one China’ policy and is opposed to Taiwan independence,” it said. MOFA responded that it is an objective fact and a common understanding shared by many that the Republic of China (ROC) is an independent, sovereign nation, with world-leading
‘ONE CHINA’: A statement that Berlin decides its own China policy did not seem to sit well with Beijing, which offered only one meeting with the German official German Minister for Foreign Affairs Johann Wadephul’s trip to China has been canceled, a spokesperson for his ministry said yesterday, amid rising tensions between the two nations, including over Taiwan. Wadephul had planned to address Chinese curbs on rare earths during his visit, but his comments about Berlin deciding on the “design” of its “one China” policy ahead of the trip appear to have rankled China. Asked about Wadephul’s comments, Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Guo Jiakun (郭嘉昆) said the “one China principle” has “no room for any self-definition.” In the interview published on Thursday, Wadephul said he would urge China to
RSS