The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) yesterday said it supported reforming the controversial year-end bonus policy for retired government employees on the grounds of social justice, but hoped to minimize the reforms’ impact.
At a meeting, DPP Chairman Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌), caucus convener Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘), lawmakers and party officials reaffirmed the party’s support for suspending or abolishing the bonus, DPP spokesperson Lin Chun-hsien (林俊憲) said in a press release.
The reforms are supported by a DPP survey that showed that 79.7 percent of respondents said giving retired government employees a one-and-a-half-month bonus a year was unfair, against 15.8 percent who said it was fair, Lin said.
A bonus of more than NT$20 billion (US$683.9 million) is distributed to retired government officials across the country annually, despite the bonus not being backed by any law.
However, the DPP also submitted a “three noes” appeal hoping to minimize the impact of the reform.
The party hoped that the reform would not be seen as directed at specific groups — civil servants, educators and military personnel — and that it would not affect retirees who are financially vulnerable.
The third “no” was that the central government should not create multiple pension systems and evade responsibility for the issue by relegating the matter to local governments.
Taipei City Councilor Liang Wen-chieh (梁文傑) and DPP Taipei City Office Director Chuang Ruei-hsiung (莊瑞雄) had different ideas.
Liang and Chuang proposed having local administrations and councils in DPP-governed cities and counties decide whether the bonus would be paid before the Executive Yuan writes the bonus into law.
Hung Chih-kun (洪智坤) has been commissioned by Liang and Chuang to submit the proposal to the party’s weekly Central Executive Committee meeting tomorrow.
FAST TRACK? Chinese spouses must renounce their Chinese citizenship and pledge allegiance to Taiwan to gain citizenship, some demonstrators said Opponents and supporters of a bill that would allow Chinese spouses to obtain Taiwanese citizenship in four years instead of six staged protests near the Legislative Yuan in Taipei yesterday morning. Those who oppose the bill proposed by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) demanded that Chinese spouses be granted citizenship only after renouncing their Chinese citizenship, passing a citizenship test and pledging allegiance to Taiwan. The demonstrators, who were protesting at a side entrance to the Legislative Yuan on Jinan Road, were mostly members of the Taiwan Association of University Professors and other organizations advocating Taiwanese independence. Supporters of the bill, led
SILENT MAJORITY: Only 1 percent of Chinese rejected all options but war to annex Taiwan, while one-third viewed war as unacceptable, a university study showed Many Chinese are more concerned with developments inside their country than with seeking unification with Taiwan, al-Jazeera reported on Friday. Although China claims Taiwan as its own territory and has vowed to annex it, by force if necessary, 23-year-old Chinese Shao Hongtian was quoted by al-Jazeera as saying that “hostilities are not the way to bring China and Taiwan together.” “I want unification to happen peacefully,” Shao said. Al-Jazeera said it changed Shao’s name to respect his wish for anonymity. If peaceful unification is not possible, Shao said he would prefer “things to remain as they are,” adding that many of his friends feel
Taiwan has “absolute air superiority” over China in its own airspace, Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) told a meeting of the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee on Monday, amid concern over whether Taipei could defend itself against a military incursion by Beijing. Po made the remarks in response to a question from Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Chiu Chih-wei (邱志偉) on whether Taiwan would have partial or complete air superiority if Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) warplanes were to enter Taiwan’s airspace. Po, a retired pilot, said that the Taiwanese military has “absolute air superiority” over PLA
A shipment of basil pesto imported by Costco Wholesale Taiwan from the US in the middle of last month was intercepted at the border after testing positive for excessive pesticide residue, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said yesterday. Samples taken from a shipment of the Kirkland Signature brand of basil pesto imported by Costco contained 0.1 milligrams per kilogram of ethylene oxide, exceeding the non-detectable limit. Ethylene oxide is a carcinogenic substance that can be used as a pesticide. The 674kg shipment of basil pesto would either be destroyed or returned to its country of origin, as is the procedure for all