As long as one accepts the “one China” principle, all other questions are open for discussion, China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) spokesman Yang Yi (楊毅) said of the controversial “one country, two areas (一國兩區)” proposal yesterday.
The proposal was made by former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Wu Po-hsiung (吳伯雄) on Thursday last week during a meeting with Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) in Beijing.
Wu was scheduled to conclude his visit to China and return to Taipei yesterday.
He said at the time that based on the legislative and political systems in China and Taiwan, “we both insist on the concept of ‘one country,’ but we have differing definitions as to what ‘one country’ means.”
“We should agree on overlapping definitions, that China and Taiwan are territories under ‘one China,’ while accepting the differences, concentrating on the real-world situation and putting bickering aside,” Wu said.
At the start of a regular press conference yesterday, Yang listed the results of the Wu-Hu meeting, saying that an important consensuses had been reached and the direction the two sides should work toward had been clarified.
This increased mutual trust in political matters, Yang said, adding that he hoped both parties would work together to promote the peaceful development of cross-strait relations to benefit people on both sides of the Taiwan Strait.
One result of the Wu-Hu meeting was acceptance that cross-strait relations had improved dramatically over the past four years and were now at their most stable state in 60 years, Yang said.
A majority of people in Taiwan and China accept the need for peaceful cross-strait development, a policy welcomed and affirmed by the international community, he added.
Wu and Hu agreed that the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) should be “responsible to the people and to history” and seize the opportunity for improved cross-strait relations, Yang said.
Agreeing to commonalities and accepting differences would make it easier to increase mutual trust, develop beneficial interactions, strengthen cooperation and build goodwill, Yang said, adding that peaceful cross-strait relations would benefit all “Chinese.”
Wu and Hu also agreed that both parties and governments should work to enhance political trust, hold to the principles of “opposition to Taiwan independence and affirm the [so-called] ‘1992 consensus.’”
This would involve establishing a clearer international consensus that both sides of the Strait subscribe to the idea of “one China,” Yang said.
The fourth area of agreement was that people on both sides of the Taiwan Strait are “Chinese” and that the “Taiwanese consciousness of loving both the land and their homes is different to the pro-Taiwan independence consciousness,” Yang said.
Wu and Hu also agreed to the continued promotion of cross-strait economic and cultural interaction to the mutual benefit of people on both sides of the Taiwan Strait, he added.
Meanwhile, Yang said China welcomed members of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to attend academic forums as academics, especially those related to Taiwanese affairs.
Yang’s comments referred to a visit by DPP spokesman Lo Chih-cheng (羅致政), who attended a two-day academic forum chaired by the Taiwan Affairs Office think tank, the Research Center for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits, earlier this month.
In response to questions about the regulation of cross-strait education and cultural events this year, Yang said that the Taiwan Affairs Office was looking to sign an accord with Taiwan that would establish mechanisms for cultural and educational interaction.
As to a suggestion made by academics at a conference in Taiwan at the weekend that a military trust mechanism could be introduced in stages, Yang said China welcomed academic discussion on the matter.
“We support both sides of the Strait interacting and debating military issues at an appropriate time in order to establish mechanisms to foster mutual trust in military matters,” he said.
Taiwan has received more than US$70 million in royalties as of the end of last year from developing the F-16V jet as countries worldwide purchase or upgrade to this popular model, government and military officials said on Saturday. Taiwan funded the development of the F-16V jet and ended up the sole investor as other countries withdrew from the program. Now the F-16V is increasingly popular and countries must pay Taiwan a percentage in royalties when they purchase new F-16V aircraft or upgrade older F-16 models. The next five years are expected to be the peak for these royalties, with Taiwan potentially earning
STAY IN YOUR LANE: As the US and Israel attack Iran, the ministry has warned China not to overstep by including Taiwanese citizens in its evacuation orders The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) yesterday rebuked a statement by China’s embassy in Israel that it would evacuate Taiwanese holders of Chinese travel documents from Israel amid the latter’s escalating conflict with Iran. Tensions have risen across the Middle East in the wake of US and Israeli airstrikes on Iran beginning Saturday. China subsequently issued an evacuation notice for its citizens. In a news release, the Chinese embassy in Israel said holders of “Taiwan compatriot permits (台胞證)” issued to Taiwanese nationals by Chinese authorities for travel to China — could register for evacuation to Egypt. In Taipei, the ministry yesterday said Taiwan
Taiwan is awaiting official notification from the US regarding the status of the Agreement on Reciprocal Trade (ART) after the US Supreme Court ruled US President Donald Trump's global tariffs unconstitutional. Speaking to reporters before a legislative hearing today, Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) said that Taiwan's negotiation team remains focused on ensuring that the bilateral trade deal remains intact despite the legal challenge to Trump's tariff policy. "The US has pledged to notify its trade partners once the subsequent administrative and legal processes are finalized, and that certainly includes Taiwan," Cho said when asked about opposition parties’ doubts that the ART was
If China chose to invade Taiwan tomorrow, it would only have to sever three undersea fiber-optic cable clusters to cause a data blackout, Jason Hsu (許毓仁), a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute and former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator, told a US security panel yesterday. In a Taiwan contingency, cable disruption would be one of the earliest preinvasion actions and the signal that escalation had begun, he said, adding that Taiwan’s current cable repair capabilities are insufficient. The US-China Economic and Security Review Commission (USCC) yesterday held a hearing on US-China Competition Under the Sea, with Hsu speaking on